Voctorian/Edwardian Erotic Photographic Art

Holliday

Banned
Banned
Messages
1,880
Pardon the typo - Victorian

images
images
images
images


images
images
images
images


images
 
Last edited:

Succubus

Entertain me you boring fucks.....
Site Supporter
Messages
5,275
Location
No where you'd like to be......
The last picture....it just doesn't seem like she should even have pubic hair, yet....are you sure she's over 18????? Beautiful art, though. Now where are all the Victorian dick pics????? Lol.

(I'm jk)
 
OP
OP
Holliday

Holliday

Banned
Banned
Messages
1,880
The last picture....it just doesn't seem like she should even have pubic hair, yet....are you sure she's over 18????? Beautiful art, though. Now where are all the Victorian dick pics????? Lol.

(I'm jk)
My guess is they are all at least 170-180 YoA. The last, a missing one was more in the 185 year range unless I miss my guess.
...and I don't know which you mean by the last since one of the pics posted has gone missing. Can you imaging there are thieves among us?
Yes - not only the women but the poses and staging are beautiful, far more so that the crap produced today.
Certainly though, miss Casey, their is more naughty Victorian erotic art, including of men, and of men and women,
and my personal fav - women and women.
You may wish to start your own thread of that sort.

koloma3.jpg
 
Last edited:

Q

Dictator of the Bastard Factory
Banned
Messages
14,660
Location
Continuum
I agree that the woman look very good. Nothing wrong with the female body in a pure form:-)

But that picture of the girl looks like it was taken when she was too young. Can you please remove it or reassure us that she is 18+?
 

Succubus

Entertain me you boring fucks.....
Site Supporter
Messages
5,275
Location
No where you'd like to be......
Are these actual pictures (photography) or would you say that some of them are oil paintings. They are beautiful. It was just the 1 picture I seen where the girl appeared to be much too young for a nude photo. I don't see anything wrong with art. Much better than half the pornographic shit you see and its more pure in form. I do realize that these are old photos but the laws of age back then were much different than they are now.
 
OP
OP
Holliday

Holliday

Banned
Banned
Messages
1,880
Are these actual pictures (photography) or would you say that some of them are oil paintings. They are beautiful. It was just the 1 picture I seen where the girl appeared to be much too young for a nude photo. I don't see anything wrong with art. Much better than half the pornographic shit you see and its more pure in form. I do realize that these are old photos but the laws of age back then were much different than they are now.
Early photography - emulsion on glass negatives, often sepia tinted paper prints.
Remember that in the late Victorian girls were not fed hormoned chicken and whatnot, so they did not have premature development as you see today. If the model was built like a grown woman, then she was a grown woman, not a child. You see also that the models have normal proportions and don't look like cartoon characters - far more beautiful than the grossly modified women of today.

Kaloma - reply #8, is by some said to be Josie - Wyatt Earp's wife to be. Most say not.
Quite the fetching lass though, and of the right time period - about 1880.
 
Last edited:

Succubus

Entertain me you boring fucks.....
Site Supporter
Messages
5,275
Location
No where you'd like to be......
Are these actual pictures (photography) or would you say that some of them are oil paintings. They are beautiful. It was just the 1 picture I seen where the girl appeared to be much too young for a nude photo. I don't see anything wrong with art. Much better than half the pornographic shit you see and its more pure in form. I do realize that these are old photos but the laws of age back then were much different than they are now.
Early photography - emulsion on glass, often sepia tinted.
Remember that in the late Victorian girls were not fed hormoned chicken and whatnot, so they did not have premature development as you see today. If the model was built like a grown woman, then she was a grown woman, not a child. You see also that the models have normal proportions and don't look like cartoon characters - far more beautiful than the grossly modified women of today.

Kaloma - reply #8, is by some said to be Josie - Wyatt Earp's wife to be. Most say not.
Quite the fetching lass though, and of the right time period - about 1880.


Good job hunting these down and sharing. I enjoy a good history lesson ever so often. :)
 

Q

Dictator of the Bastard Factory
Banned
Messages
14,660
Location
Continuum
far more beautiful than the grossly modified women of today.

I definately agree with that :-)

Natural woman are the best. I do not understand why people modify their bodies so much to "look better".
 

Q

Dictator of the Bastard Factory
Banned
Messages
14,660
Location
Continuum
OP
OP
Holliday

Holliday

Banned
Banned
Messages
1,880
What you people are doing here is not appropriate on what is easily the most beautiful thread on this pitiful board.

Kindly be ashamed of yourselves.
 

Succubus

Entertain me you boring fucks.....
Site Supporter
Messages
5,275
Location
No where you'd like to be......
What you people are doing here is not appropriate on what is easily the most beautiful thread on this pitiful board.

Kindly be ashamed of yourselves.


I was being genuine in my question. No foul intent whatsoever. Maxis turns everything good and decent into his sick twisted sexual fantasies.