LotusBud's latest activity

I have made my argument, and I have challenged you to make yours. You have not posted a single solitary thing that proves Comey brokke...

You're an idiot if you think "86" is a violent threat.

Intent vs. Interpretation: In the 2023 case Counterman v. Colorado, the Supreme Court ruled that for a statement to be a "true threat,"...

86 47. And have me arrested for saying it.

Note to wizer: Evading the question will never make what Comey did illegal. There is no law against what he did, and you're actually a...

I should fuck off because you have no idea what law was broken by Comey?

You are being completely illogical. Good lord. And I know you think you're smart. That's the prt that's really sad.

Trump is an idiot. Saying 86 47 is not illegal, nor is it a threat of violence. It's the same as saying "fire him." Gee, didn't Trump...

Trump is an idiot. Saying 86 47 is not illegal, nor is it a threat of violence. It's the same as saying "fire him." Gee, didn't Trump...

Trump is an idiot. Saying 86 47 is not illegal, nor is a threat of violence. It's the same as saying "fire him." Gee, didn't Trump...

ou are being completely illogical. Good lord. And I know you think you're smart. That's the prt that's really sad.

No, if there was a law that was broken, you CAN cite it. I cannot prove to you such a law doesn't exist, now can I? Damn. You're not...

I never said there's a god, did I?

No, if there was a law that was broken, you CAN cite it. I cannot prove to you such a law doesn't exist, nowc=can I? Damn. You're not...

What homework are you asking me to do? Cite a nonexistant law? How do you propose I do that?