Department of Homeland Security? Or Department of Orthodoxy Enforcement?

[Admin.]

She didn't dox anyone.

YES SHE DID.

 

[LotusBud]

And you've been provided them, then promptly ignored them, you rusty hubcap.

Bullshit. You have not posted her actual posts and the actual response to them. Not once. Don't give me that nonsense, Sean Hannity Jr.

 

[Courier 6]

YES SHE DID.

Then why is that not in any of the reporting? (Spoiler: Because you made it up.)

 

[Lily]

She didn't dox anyone.

She did the school and by extension the families that have children there, the teachers and administrators.

This is something she finds "perverse":

 

[Jack]

YES SHE DID.

Ok I'm confused. My understanding was she complained and they revealed her PI in response.

 

[Courier 6]

Bullshit. You have not posted her actual posts and the actual response to them.

Because that's not in any of the reporting. Again, you're demanding information which hasn't been made available, which is a bad-faith demand.

 

[Courier 6]

Ok I'm confused. My understanding was she complained and they revealed her PI in response.

This is just what @Admin does -- skims, misinterprets, and goes into a shrieking tangent based on his own hilariously distorted misperception of the material.

 

[Lily]

Because that's not in any of the reporting. Again, you're demanding information which hasn't been made available, which is a bad-faith demand.

So, you don't know what she did. Yet, you're taking her side of the story as "oppression".

 

[LotusBud]

Because that's not in any of the reporting. Again, you're demanding information which hasn't been made available, which is a bad-faith demand.

See, the thing you don't seem to understand is, if the facts don't show up in the reporting, then odds are you don't and can't possibly know wtf is going on, so maybe you should stfu until you do. The only bad faith in our exchanges is you, making pronouncements and accusations when you have none of the facts, @Edgar Friendly

 

[Jack]

Because that's not in any of the reporting. Again, you're demanding information which hasn't been made available, which is a bad-faith demand.

should have put a period after available and deleted the non-sequitur.

Just my opinion. we need to have this discussion from all viewpoints unfettered.

 

[Lily]

Ok I'm confused. My understanding was she complained and they revealed her PI in response.

I believe the military officer reported her to the local authorities.

 

[Jack]

I believe the military officer reported her to the local authorities.

yeah and then they fucking doxxed her, and she got threatened by assholes like adam irl

I mean, that's my understanding of it

 

[Admin.]

No they doxxed her IIRC in response to her complaints. Isn't that the premise to this thread?

I

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

On review Busy Body Angela Reading did not specifically name names, but she did identify the school and started an uproar which is too easy to do with issues like this.

 

[Admin.]

I believe the military officer reported her to the local authorities.

VIA email. not publicaly.

 

[Lily]

yeah and then they fucking doxxed her, and she got threatened by assholes like adam irl

I mean, that's my understanding of it

I haven't read that in the things I've seen. Of course, I don't read right wing narratives.

I was under the impression that she was outing the activity at school to whomever could read her FB posts, putting those people at risk for threats too.

 

[Courier 6]

See, the thing you don't seem to understand is, if the facts don't show up in the reporting, then odds are you don't and can't possibly know wtf is going on, so maybe you should stfu until you do.

The facts do show up in the reporting. You're nitpicking the exclusion of a single element in order to hand-wave everything else. That's bad-faith.

However, having done your homework for you, here:

 

[Lily]

After all, schools across the country are targeted and minors are murdered, often. I can see where the people feel they were put at risk by this woman's hysteria.

 

[LotusBud]

And @Edgar Friendly, our Obfuscator in Chief, will never admit to the errors he has made in this thread, though he demands that others make such admissions as a prerequisite for his respect.

 

[Admin.]

yeah and then they fucking doxxed her, and she got threatened by assholes like adam irl

I mean, that's my understanding of it

This is what set off Miss Henny Penny.

 

[Jack]

Third paragraph second sentence invalidates the entire "argument"

 

[LotusBud]

The facts do show up in the reporting. You're nitpicking the exclusion of a single element in order to hand-wave everything else. That's bad-faith.

However, having done your homework for you, here:

You did my homework? You are the one who started this thread and made the claims, pal. It's on you.

 

[Courier 6]

VIA email. not publicaly.

Via an email that was CC'd to multiple parties, you mean.

 

[Courier 6]

You did my homework? You are the one who started this thread and made the claims, pal. It's on you.

You're the one who demanded a deeper dive; it's on you to do the further research you demand, you entitled soup spoon.

 

[Jack]

This is what set off Miss Henny Penny off

I stand corrected.

 

[Jack]

You're the one who demanded a deeper dive; it's on you to do the further research you demand, you entitled soup spoon.

 

[LotusBud]

The facts do show up in the reporting. You're nitpicking the exclusion of a single element in order to hand-wave everything else. That's bad-faith.

However, having done your homework for you, here:

That post is not the one that caused this all to happen.

 

[Courier 6]

This is what set off Miss Henny Penny off

No, it isn't. This is:

 

[Courier 6]

That post is not the one that caused this all to happen.

Yes, in fact, it is. And since you've been demanding to see it all this time, you don't know otherwise, do you.

 

[LotusBud]

No, it isn't. This is:

HORRORS!!!!!!

 

[Lily]

No, it isn't. This is:

And what is perverse about those words and flags?