The OP is a Reuter's article and I didn't have to pay to read it.
You fuckers don't even try...damn. Hang your gloves...you fucking suck at this.
There is more to this post we will address at the end......
But for now, let's look at the article in the OP.....
Direct quote from the article........
"Trump contested intelligence assessments relayed earlier this year by his spy chief that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon when he spoke with reporters at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey"
The context......what was said by Gabbard was contested months ago.....history.
What Gabbard said
"In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that the U.S. intelligence community continued to believe that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon. "The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon," she said"
An assessment that at-that-time Iran was not currently building nukes.....not that they couldn't.......not that they wouldn't.......not that the might.......not they were not trying. Just that at the time they were not building nukes.
So as sure most Libtards believe that gender can be fluid......so is the world of espionage and intelligence.......
"On Friday, Gabbard said in a post on the social media platform X that: "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.""
Gabbard's response.......
"She said the media has taken her March testimony "out of context" and was trying to "manufacture division.""
So this next part of the article is really the crux of the matter.......so.......
@Admin.
@Lily
@LotusBud
@Jack
@The New Holliday
and your fellow Libtards......
A source with access to U.S. intelligence reports told Reuters the March assessment presented by Gabbard has not changed. The source said U.S. spy services judged it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice.
David Albright, a former UN nuclear inspector, questioned the revised view offered by Gabbard on Friday, estimating it would take Iran at least six months to produce a crude nuclear "device" that could not be delivered by a missile."
"six months"........are you able to understand the concept of time Libtards?
March....1
April.......2
May........3
June......almost 4 down!
July........5
August...6
Or by December depending when you want to start the clock.....it would be nice if they had a nuke option rather than drive a truck into a Christmas Market right?
Do not worry that the Iranians don't have a missle capable of delivering it.......right now dark fleet tankers are appearing in Russian steppes.....no way the could sneek it onto a plane or ship right?
Oh.....and finally
@Lily.....he was saying the NYT article was behind a paywall Dum-Dum.....not the one in the OP.