Menu
Home
Forum Rules
Store
Donate
Meltdown Mayhem Hacks ⚔︎
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Political Fray
‘Unmasking Antifa Act' includes 15-year prison term proposal.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aunty mabels cuntwash" data-source="post: 6315" data-attributes="member: 103"><p>Here's the thing.</p><p></p><p>Yes, violent and anti-social cunts who engage in behaviour that infringes on other peoples rights should not expect the kinds of protection they would deny others. I don't care who they are. But fuck the idea of getting fined exorbitant amounts of your hard earned money because you happened to find yourself among a "protest" on October 31st in a Bugs Bunny mask. Don't laugh, weirder things have happened.</p><p></p><p>The US has its first and second amendment rights. These <strong><u>ought</u></strong> to trump state legislation in those states which for whatever reason rule that "stand your ground" is not a defence against protecting yourself or your property, nor the abdridgement of an individual's rights to free expression, irrespective of what attire they happen to be wearing at the time. And as far as I can tell, there is no constitutional right provided for those delightful little individuals who like to congregate in mobs for the purposes of fucking up others whose expressed ideals are at odds with their own, be it with firearms or bottles of Jenkem.</p><p></p><p>This whole "Unmasking of ANTIFA" act would likely not pass muster in front of SCOTUS and by rights it shouldn't. It is a breach of your first amendment to levy fines against people for showing up in headdress, especially if certain immigrants of middle-eastern extraction are given a free pass "because religion". Which you can bet they will be. Fuck that noise.</p><p></p><p>Masks are not in and of themselves a problem. People's actions are. If you're out and about and you suddenly find yourself or a family member menaced by an antagonistic club wielding neanderthal "anti-fascist", you should be well within your rights to kneecap the bastard where he or she stands and without the state stepping in on their behalf. Similarly, if that prick is simply yelling a bunch of shit you don't personally like but NOT threatening to damage you in any way and you start whaling in on them, the state should then hold you accountable. It is the state's duty to protect its citizenry, to maintain some semblance of order. It is not the state's right to establish precedents that might conceivably be used to fuck over selected individuals on a whim, which on the face of it is exactly what this unmask legislation appears to be.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aunty mabels cuntwash, post: 6315, member: 103"] Here's the thing. Yes, violent and anti-social cunts who engage in behaviour that infringes on other peoples rights should not expect the kinds of protection they would deny others. I don't care who they are. But fuck the idea of getting fined exorbitant amounts of your hard earned money because you happened to find yourself among a "protest" on October 31st in a Bugs Bunny mask. Don't laugh, weirder things have happened. The US has its first and second amendment rights. These [b][u]ought[/u][/b] to trump state legislation in those states which for whatever reason rule that "stand your ground" is not a defence against protecting yourself or your property, nor the abdridgement of an individual's rights to free expression, irrespective of what attire they happen to be wearing at the time. And as far as I can tell, there is no constitutional right provided for those delightful little individuals who like to congregate in mobs for the purposes of fucking up others whose expressed ideals are at odds with their own, be it with firearms or bottles of Jenkem. This whole "Unmasking of ANTIFA" act would likely not pass muster in front of SCOTUS and by rights it shouldn't. It is a breach of your first amendment to levy fines against people for showing up in headdress, especially if certain immigrants of middle-eastern extraction are given a free pass "because religion". Which you can bet they will be. Fuck that noise. Masks are not in and of themselves a problem. People's actions are. If you're out and about and you suddenly find yourself or a family member menaced by an antagonistic club wielding neanderthal "anti-fascist", you should be well within your rights to kneecap the bastard where he or she stands and without the state stepping in on their behalf. Similarly, if that prick is simply yelling a bunch of shit you don't personally like but NOT threatening to damage you in any way and you start whaling in on them, the state should then hold you accountable. It is the state's duty to protect its citizenry, to maintain some semblance of order. It is not the state's right to establish precedents that might conceivably be used to fuck over selected individuals on a whim, which on the face of it is exactly what this unmask legislation appears to be. [/QUOTE]
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Political Fray
‘Unmasking Antifa Act' includes 15-year prison term proposal.
