Menu
Home
Forum Rules
Donate
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Ground Level - Drama Free
[NEWS-FLASH]
At Least 10 People Killed On New Orleans’ Bourbon Street After Car Drives Into Crowd Officials Say
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The New Holliday" data-source="post: 1043166" data-attributes="member: 3122"><p>So, I want to address the idea that the estimates of deaths for the genocide committed by muslims in India upon Hindu people is implausible by comparison to other genocides I have mentioned and the figures not challenged.</p><p></p><p>I was going to present in the opposite order but think this better. Let's start with those which are nearly universally accepted. Exceptions - Neo-Nazis deny Jewish deaths. Muslims deny Armenian Genocide.</p><p></p><p>Native American by the Spanish:</p><p> 55 million in 100 years representing 80 - 95% of the total population. 550,000/year as average</p><p></p><p>Nazi genocide of Jews - 6 million of 9.5 million (European pop prior to genocide)</p><p> 60+% over 4 years - 1.5 million/year</p><p></p><p>Armenian Genocide - 1.4- 1.5 million of 2 million in the Ottoman empire 1915</p><p> 5 years - 280-300 thousand/year. 70-75%</p><p></p><p>Then 270 million has been rejected as extreme by some (mostly muslims but also some other apologists)</p><p></p><p> So I have decided to work with the lowest of estimates - 100 million and work through the calculations (which after having concluded I ran through an AI generator with precisely the same results)</p><p></p><p>Low estimate pop of India (virtually all Hindu) 700 CE - 100 million</p><p> Accepted birth rates - births per 1000 total population in 1700 and 1900 - over 40 per 1000.</p><p>No reason to expect it was lower between 700 CE and 1700 CE...maybe even higher, but I used 40.</p><p> I also assume a constant pop though it rose slightly over time.</p><p></p><p>I assumed a 50% mortality prior to reproductive age.</p><p> Taking then 50% of the 100 mill - 50 million (this is my generosity in suppressing the actual number of births over the period of genocide)</p><p>50 million at 40 per 1000 over 1000 years is 2 billion births. And - I'll again take only 85% of those as Hindu or</p><p> 1.7 Billion. Those are individuals lives during those 1000 years.</p><p></p><p>...or 100 million of 1.7 billion = 5.88%. Let's bump that to the to the 270 million - then less than 16%</p><p></p><p>which is somehow less plausable that 80-95% or 60% or 70-75%</p><p></p><p>Why?</p><p></p><p>I'll tell you why - because some people's masters have given them the playbook, and the playbook says one shall not speak ugly truth about muslims and islam. Deny deny deny when the truth is spoken.</p><p> Well, as my mom used to say...Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The New Holliday, post: 1043166, member: 3122"] So, I want to address the idea that the estimates of deaths for the genocide committed by muslims in India upon Hindu people is implausible by comparison to other genocides I have mentioned and the figures not challenged. I was going to present in the opposite order but think this better. Let's start with those which are nearly universally accepted. Exceptions - Neo-Nazis deny Jewish deaths. Muslims deny Armenian Genocide. Native American by the Spanish: 55 million in 100 years representing 80 - 95% of the total population. 550,000/year as average Nazi genocide of Jews - 6 million of 9.5 million (European pop prior to genocide) 60+% over 4 years - 1.5 million/year Armenian Genocide - 1.4- 1.5 million of 2 million in the Ottoman empire 1915 5 years - 280-300 thousand/year. 70-75% Then 270 million has been rejected as extreme by some (mostly muslims but also some other apologists) So I have decided to work with the lowest of estimates - 100 million and work through the calculations (which after having concluded I ran through an AI generator with precisely the same results) Low estimate pop of India (virtually all Hindu) 700 CE - 100 million Accepted birth rates - births per 1000 total population in 1700 and 1900 - over 40 per 1000. No reason to expect it was lower between 700 CE and 1700 CE...maybe even higher, but I used 40. I also assume a constant pop though it rose slightly over time. I assumed a 50% mortality prior to reproductive age. Taking then 50% of the 100 mill - 50 million (this is my generosity in suppressing the actual number of births over the period of genocide) 50 million at 40 per 1000 over 1000 years is 2 billion births. And - I'll again take only 85% of those as Hindu or 1.7 Billion. Those are individuals lives during those 1000 years. ...or 100 million of 1.7 billion = 5.88%. Let's bump that to the to the 270 million - then less than 16% which is somehow less plausable that 80-95% or 60% or 70-75% Why? I'll tell you why - because some people's masters have given them the playbook, and the playbook says one shall not speak ugly truth about muslims and islam. Deny deny deny when the truth is spoken. Well, as my mom used to say...Denial isn't just a river in Egypt. [/QUOTE]
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Ground Level - Drama Free
[NEWS-FLASH]
At Least 10 People Killed On New Orleans’ Bourbon Street After Car Drives Into Crowd Officials Say
