Dear Business-friendly Cons

LotusBud

Site Supporter
Reaction score
9,774
Location
Portugal
Do you understand that you are putting businesses at risk by refusing to wear masks and pressuring them to drop their mask policies? How, you ask? Those businesses will lose the business of people who don't want to shop where people are running around maskless.

Why do you hate business people?

Why?
 

Breakfall

Such is life...
ASS BOXED
Reaction score
5,644
Location
Great Southern Land
Do you understand that you are putting businesses at risk by refusing to wear masks and pressuring them to drop their mask policies? How, you ask? Those businesses will lose the business of people who don't want to shop where people are running around maskless.

Why do you hate business people?

Why?
Shut your cunting mouth you fucking idiot.
 

SHAMPAIN

Vape Nation
Site Supporter
Reaction score
8,264
Location
Halfway Up Ben Nevis
Do you understand that you are putting businesses at risk by refusing to wear masks and pressuring them to drop their mask policies? How, you ask? Those businesses will lose the business of people who don't want to shop where people are running around maskless.

Why do you hate business people?

Why?
I wear a mask going into shops, I've no issue with it at all...
Sorry for the shitty pic, webcam photos suck!
I fucked it and got my 1st jab today...
dQQO9sZ.jpg

lol
 

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,264
Location
Springfield
Do you understand that you are putting businesses at risk by refusing to wear masks and pressuring them to drop their mask policies? How, you ask? Those businesses will lose the business of people who don't want to shop where people are running around maskless.

Why do you hate business people?

Why?
Because I hate you and hope to kill people like you by perpetually spreading the virus. I pray to the virus daily that it will inhabit me forever so that I may spread its message of death and destruction. BTW, masks dont do shit.
 

Holliday Unchained

Banned
Banned
Reaction score
591
Location
Undisclosed
Because I hate you and hope to kill people like you by perpetually spreading the virus. I pray to the virus daily that it will inhabit me forever so that I may spread its message of death and destruction.
Just a reminder, loctardita.

"I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me."

“Thou shalt not kill.”
 

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,264
Location
Springfield
Because I hate you and hope to kill people like you by perpetually spreading the virus. I pray to the virus daily that it will inhabit me forever so that I may spread its message of death and destruction.
Just a reminder, loctardita.

"I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me."

“Thou shalt not kill.”
Its ok, faggit. This is "different" and I have a special pass. Oh yea, and the virus is one of Gods creatures too, right?
 
OP
OP
LotusBud

LotusBud

Site Supporter
Reaction score
9,774
Location
Portugal
Because I hate you and hope to kill people like you by perpetually spreading the virus. I pray to the virus daily that it will inhabit me forever so that I may spread its message of death and destruction.
Just a reminder, loctardita.

"I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me."

“Thou shalt not kill.”
Because I hate you and hope to kill people like you by perpetually spreading the virus. I pray to the virus daily that it will inhabit me forever so that I may spread its message of death and destruction.
Just a reminder, loctardita.

"I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me."

“Thou shalt not kill.”

I'm surprised the virus hasn't taken him out yet. Jesus is locking and loading for people like him.
 

Holliday Unchained

Banned
Banned
Reaction score
591
Location
Undisclosed
Because I hate you and hope to kill people like you by perpetually spreading the virus. I pray to the virus daily that it will inhabit me forever so that I may spread its message of death and destruction.
Just a reminder, loctardita.

"I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me."

“Thou shalt not kill.”
Because I hate you and hope to kill people like you by perpetually spreading the virus. I pray to the virus daily that it will inhabit me forever so that I may spread its message of death and destruction.
Just a reminder, loctardita.

"I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me."

“Thou shalt not kill.”

I'm surprised the virus hasn't taken him out yet. Jesus is locking and loading for people like him.
Maybe just offering one last chance to repent.
 

Dove

Domestically feral
Site Supporter
Reaction score
24,641
Location
United states
Shutting down businesses by force and then putting a 15 dollar an hour minimum wage is destroying businesses. So are riots.

So is that thing were you ignore everything done by the left that is actually destroying businesses to focus on some fringe people refusing to wear masks? And of course.... those are all conservatives.

Because everyone who disagrees with the left or does something they dont like is a "con".

Perhaps the real problem is the fact that the government is deciding who gets to stay open? They shouldnt be allowed to do that.

So maybe if they drop this stupid mandate and leave private businesses alone this wouldnt be a problem. If business owners want customers to wear masks.. ..they can reject doing business with those who dont.

You shouldnt be supporting over reach. It's not the people refusing to comply that are the problem. It's the government over reach. This is the shit that happens when the government is weaponized.

If the state cares oh so much about the wellbeing of the people and small businesses, they wouldnt be enabling fucking riots.
 
OP
OP
LotusBud

LotusBud

Site Supporter
Reaction score
9,774
Location
Portugal
Wearing a mask is such a simple thing to do. It's absurd to try to claim that has something to do with liberty. Refusing to wear one is so hostile and narcissistic. It's simply evil.
 

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,264
Location
Springfield
Because I hate you and hope to kill people like you by perpetually spreading the virus. I pray to the virus daily that it will inhabit me forever so that I may spread its message of death and destruction.
Just a reminder, loctardita.

"I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me."

“Thou shalt not kill.”
Because I hate you and hope to kill people like you by perpetually spreading the virus. I pray to the virus daily that it will inhabit me forever so that I may spread its message of death and destruction.
Just a reminder, loctardita.

"I am the Lord thy God, thou shalt not have any strange gods before Me."

“Thou shalt not kill.”

I'm surprised the virus hasn't taken him out yet. Jesus is locking and loading for people like him.
The virus is my friend, bitch...and we dont like your kind!
 

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,264
Location
Springfield
Wearing a mask is such a simple thing to do. It's absurd to try to claim that has something to do with liberty. Refusing to wear one is so hostile and narcissistic. It's simply evil.
And yet its such a worthless fukin thing to do. You dumb fuckers could actually stop ALL virus' if you used tax dollars to supply space suits for everyone. Of course faggits and brain dead niggers would have to get all the suits first, followed by women, men who identify as women, and followed lastly by white men with 6 figure jobs if there are any left. Stupid whore.
 

Holliday Unchained

Banned
Banned
Reaction score
591
Location
Undisclosed
Amid all your mask-wearing, travel-canceling, quarantining, and social distancing over the last 10 months, you may have wondered at some point: Have all these precautions not only helped me avoid spreading and catching COVID-19, but also avoid picking up a nasty flu this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
? If so, your instincts may be spot on. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirm that many regions, including the U.S., have seen, and continue to see, significantly
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
RELATED:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"The percentage of U.S. respiratory specimens submitted for influenza testing that tested positive decreased from [above] 20 percent to 2.3 precent, and has remained at historically low interseasonal levels (0.2 percent versus 1 to 2 percent)," the CDC announced in a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in September 2020. And as of its latest
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
update (for the week ending January 2, 2021): "Seasonal influenza activity in the United States remains lower than usual for this time of year."

The CDC cites the "mitigation measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2"—in addition to people getting their
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
—as helping to minimize flu cases during the 2020-21 flu season (the time of year when the number of influenza infections rises, typically lasting from October to May). In other words, all the traveling/gathering we're not doing, and the hand-washing and face-covering we are doing have likely influenced the declines in influenza virus circulation.
"I do think that COVID-19 precautions, including masks, improved hygiene, and social distancing, could have a positive impact on the flu season this year," says
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the specialty medical director of internal medicine at Atrium Health. "Influenza and COVID-19 are both viruses spread by respiratory droplets. Any efforts we make to decrease the spread of such droplets should help decrease the spread of both viruses."

This may not come as a huge shock, since it's only logical that these "interventions aimed against SARS-CoV-2 transmission" would simultaneously slow the transmission of other respiratory viruses, like the flu or
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which also spread primarily by droplet transmission (and which already spread less easily than the coronavirus anyway). And medical experts have likely predicted it from the start, corroborated by Dr. Teague's comments. But it's fascinating to see real data proving these suspicions correct—at least in part. The public health agency does also attribute the notably low reported incidents of flu infections to the fact that, due to the coronavirus, fewer people sought routine check-ups or treatment for typical flu-like symptoms, so it's possible some flu cases went unaccounted for.
The report notes, too, that the CDC will continue to keep a close eye on influenza circulation to see if low flu activity sticks around once communities have eventually loosened their coronavirus mitigation efforts. Or if the 2021-2022 season will be reduced or delayed due to sustained COVID precautions through the year.
Finally, the CDC also mentions, "in the future, some of these community mitigation measures could be implemented during influenza epidemics to reduce transmission, particularly in populations at highest risk for developing severe disease or complications." Does this mean you'll have to wear a mask and avoid human contact every single flu season? Probably (hopefully!) not. However, it offers health officials a valuable piece of information when comes to finding widespread interventions for protecting vulnerable people against the flu.
 

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,264
Location
Springfield
Amid all your mask-wearing, travel-canceling, quarantining, and social distancing over the last 10 months, you may have wondered at some point: Have all these precautions not only helped me avoid spreading and catching COVID-19, but also avoid picking up a nasty flu this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
? If so, your instincts may be spot on. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirm that many regions, including the U.S., have seen, and continue to see, significantly
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
RELATED:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"The percentage of U.S. respiratory specimens submitted for influenza testing that tested positive decreased from [above] 20 percent to 2.3 precent, and has remained at historically low interseasonal levels (0.2 percent versus 1 to 2 percent)," the CDC announced in a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in September 2020. And as of its latest
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
update (for the week ending January 2, 2021): "Seasonal influenza activity in the United States remains lower than usual for this time of year."

The CDC cites the "mitigation measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2"—in addition to people getting their
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
—as helping to minimize flu cases during the 2020-21 flu season (the time of year when the number of influenza infections rises, typically lasting from October to May). In other words, all the traveling/gathering we're not doing, and the hand-washing and face-covering we are doing have likely influenced the declines in influenza virus circulation.
"I do think that COVID-19 precautions, including masks, improved hygiene, and social distancing, could have a positive impact on the flu season this year," says
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the specialty medical director of internal medicine at Atrium Health. "Influenza and COVID-19 are both viruses spread by respiratory droplets. Any efforts we make to decrease the spread of such droplets should help decrease the spread of both viruses."

This may not come as a huge shock, since it's only logical that these "interventions aimed against SARS-CoV-2 transmission" would simultaneously slow the transmission of other respiratory viruses, like the flu or
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which also spread primarily by droplet transmission (and which already spread less easily than the coronavirus anyway). And medical experts have likely predicted it from the start, corroborated by Dr. Teague's comments. But it's fascinating to see real data proving these suspicions correct—at least in part. The public health agency does also attribute the notably low reported incidents of flu infections to the fact that, due to the coronavirus, fewer people sought routine check-ups or treatment for typical flu-like symptoms, so it's possible some flu cases went unaccounted for.
The report notes, too, that the CDC will continue to keep a close eye on influenza circulation to see if low flu activity sticks around once communities have eventually loosened their coronavirus mitigation efforts. Or if the 2021-2022 season will be reduced or delayed due to sustained COVID precautions through the year.
Finally, the CDC also mentions, "in the future, some of these community mitigation measures could be implemented during influenza epidemics to reduce transmission, particularly in populations at highest risk for developing severe disease or complications." Does this mean you'll have to wear a mask and avoid human contact every single flu season? Probably (hopefully!) not. However, it offers health officials a valuable piece of information when comes to finding widespread interventions for protecting vulnerable people against the flu.
Sorry asshole:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Of course libtards respons with "Nuh uhhhh!"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
OP
OP
LotusBud

LotusBud

Site Supporter
Reaction score
9,774
Location
Portugal
Amid all your mask-wearing, travel-canceling, quarantining, and social distancing over the last 10 months, you may have wondered at some point: Have all these precautions not only helped me avoid spreading and catching COVID-19, but also avoid picking up a nasty flu this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
? If so, your instincts may be spot on. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirm that many regions, including the U.S., have seen, and continue to see, significantly
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
RELATED:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"The percentage of U.S. respiratory specimens submitted for influenza testing that tested positive decreased from [above] 20 percent to 2.3 precent, and has remained at historically low interseasonal levels (0.2 percent versus 1 to 2 percent)," the CDC announced in a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in September 2020. And as of its latest
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
update (for the week ending January 2, 2021): "Seasonal influenza activity in the United States remains lower than usual for this time of year."

The CDC cites the "mitigation measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2"—in addition to people getting their
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
—as helping to minimize flu cases during the 2020-21 flu season (the time of year when the number of influenza infections rises, typically lasting from October to May). In other words, all the traveling/gathering we're not doing, and the hand-washing and face-covering we are doing have likely influenced the declines in influenza virus circulation.
"I do think that COVID-19 precautions, including masks, improved hygiene, and social distancing, could have a positive impact on the flu season this year," says
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the specialty medical director of internal medicine at Atrium Health. "Influenza and COVID-19 are both viruses spread by respiratory droplets. Any efforts we make to decrease the spread of such droplets should help decrease the spread of both viruses."

This may not come as a huge shock, since it's only logical that these "interventions aimed against SARS-CoV-2 transmission" would simultaneously slow the transmission of other respiratory viruses, like the flu or
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which also spread primarily by droplet transmission (and which already spread less easily than the coronavirus anyway). And medical experts have likely predicted it from the start, corroborated by Dr. Teague's comments. But it's fascinating to see real data proving these suspicions correct—at least in part. The public health agency does also attribute the notably low reported incidents of flu infections to the fact that, due to the coronavirus, fewer people sought routine check-ups or treatment for typical flu-like symptoms, so it's possible some flu cases went unaccounted for.
The report notes, too, that the CDC will continue to keep a close eye on influenza circulation to see if low flu activity sticks around once communities have eventually loosened their coronavirus mitigation efforts. Or if the 2021-2022 season will be reduced or delayed due to sustained COVID precautions through the year.
Finally, the CDC also mentions, "in the future, some of these community mitigation measures could be implemented during influenza epidemics to reduce transmission, particularly in populations at highest risk for developing severe disease or complications." Does this mean you'll have to wear a mask and avoid human contact every single flu season? Probably (hopefully!) not. However, it offers health officials a valuable piece of information when comes to finding widespread interventions for protecting vulnerable people against the flu.
Sorry asshole:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Of course libtards respons with "Nuh uhhhh!"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Wow. Just wow. The claim is taken from a Wordpress post. From you OWN link:

Study did not find 1,500 positive COVID tests were actually flu
By BEATRICE DUPUYApril 30, 2021


CLAIM: Scientists, including researchers from seven universities, found that 1,500 laboratory samples that had supposedly tested positive for COVID-19 were actually positive for influenza, proving that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention committed fraud.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The claim, which has circulated before with slightly different information, is fabricated. There is no evidence of such a study, and the identity of the scientist said to have led the investigation cannot be confirmed.
 
Last edited:

Lokmar

Site Supporter
Reaction score
7,264
Location
Springfield
Amid all your mask-wearing, travel-canceling, quarantining, and social distancing over the last 10 months, you may have wondered at some point: Have all these precautions not only helped me avoid spreading and catching COVID-19, but also avoid picking up a nasty flu this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
? If so, your instincts may be spot on. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirm that many regions, including the U.S., have seen, and continue to see, significantly
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
RELATED:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"The percentage of U.S. respiratory specimens submitted for influenza testing that tested positive decreased from [above] 20 percent to 2.3 precent, and has remained at historically low interseasonal levels (0.2 percent versus 1 to 2 percent)," the CDC announced in a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in September 2020. And as of its latest
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
update (for the week ending January 2, 2021): "Seasonal influenza activity in the United States remains lower than usual for this time of year."

The CDC cites the "mitigation measures to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2"—in addition to people getting their
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
—as helping to minimize flu cases during the 2020-21 flu season (the time of year when the number of influenza infections rises, typically lasting from October to May). In other words, all the traveling/gathering we're not doing, and the hand-washing and face-covering we are doing have likely influenced the declines in influenza virus circulation.
"I do think that COVID-19 precautions, including masks, improved hygiene, and social distancing, could have a positive impact on the flu season this year," says
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the specialty medical director of internal medicine at Atrium Health. "Influenza and COVID-19 are both viruses spread by respiratory droplets. Any efforts we make to decrease the spread of such droplets should help decrease the spread of both viruses."

This may not come as a huge shock, since it's only logical that these "interventions aimed against SARS-CoV-2 transmission" would simultaneously slow the transmission of other respiratory viruses, like the flu or
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, which also spread primarily by droplet transmission (and which already spread less easily than the coronavirus anyway). And medical experts have likely predicted it from the start, corroborated by Dr. Teague's comments. But it's fascinating to see real data proving these suspicions correct—at least in part. The public health agency does also attribute the notably low reported incidents of flu infections to the fact that, due to the coronavirus, fewer people sought routine check-ups or treatment for typical flu-like symptoms, so it's possible some flu cases went unaccounted for.
The report notes, too, that the CDC will continue to keep a close eye on influenza circulation to see if low flu activity sticks around once communities have eventually loosened their coronavirus mitigation efforts. Or if the 2021-2022 season will be reduced or delayed due to sustained COVID precautions through the year.
Finally, the CDC also mentions, "in the future, some of these community mitigation measures could be implemented during influenza epidemics to reduce transmission, particularly in populations at highest risk for developing severe disease or complications." Does this mean you'll have to wear a mask and avoid human contact every single flu season? Probably (hopefully!) not. However, it offers health officials a valuable piece of information when comes to finding widespread interventions for protecting vulnerable people against the flu.
Sorry asshole:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Of course libtards respons with "Nuh uhhhh!"
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Wow. Just wow. The claim is taken from a Wordpress post. From you OWN link:

Study did not find 1,500 positive COVID tests were actually flu
By BEATRICE DUPUYApril 30, 2021


CLAIM: Scientists, including researchers from seven universities, found that 1,500 laboratory samples that had supposedly tested positive for COVID-19 were actually positive for influenza, proving that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention committed fraud.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. The claim, which has circulated before with slightly different information, is fabricated. There is no evidence of such a study, and the identity of the scientist said to have led the investigation cannot be confirmed.
You assholes got running to the AP everytime I mention Fox News. Best go have a talk with the AP.