Menu
Home
Forum Rules
Store
Donate
Meltdown Mayhem Hacks ⚔︎
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Meltdown
Flame Match Discussion Thread....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flynn" data-source="post: 1279923" data-attributes="member: 537"><p>Your observations right or wrong is just that. Your opinions/observations The golden era of flaming was like The Attitude Era in the WWE. That time will never be duplicated. Too many talented writers haunting a handful of small obscure forums causing havoc at huge online boards.</p><p></p><p>This incarnation of what flaming has turned into is an abomination and blasphemy. But hey we gotta work with what we got, right? The newer generation of shit talkers may not be what we are used to, but it is flaming to an extent. Sans the political discourse, and the LGBTQ community. While homos have always been easy marks online, this newer version of trolls use it like it's a teething bottle.</p><p></p><p>You have bad mouthed certain "flamers," and the whole flaming thing in general at one point, even with you vacating some boards over it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, the flaming isn't what brings you back. I get it, it's the people. But most of those people are flaming or trolling. So by proxy you come out here for the people, but the people are flaming, something now you say shouldn't be coupled in with the older iterations.</p><p></p><p>I can accept anything anyone says. It's just when their answers change like a clock in a 24-hour period, I start to wonder what they are actually saying. On one hand you dislike this newer generation of flaming, and don't want it to be called that, yet you participate in what you say shouldn't be compared with 1990's-2000's level of flaming. Isn't that kinda restrictive and contradictory on your part.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Garraty, Garraty...you mean to tell me that admin annoys you so, that you need the little semen chaser on ignore? I see it as one of the downsides of having an open mind. I feel that even shlong suckers like admin can perhaps even teach me something if the planets were to align.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I see.</p><p></p><p>So what have you been doing the last 6 or so years? You've been out here telling others to fuck off...most recently LotusToast. Are you just merely "interacting?" I'd hate to think that you and the rest of the forum come on here acting like you do in real life.</p><p></p><p>What you were doing is flaming. Something you say doesn't exist in this time period or/and should not be defined as such.</p><p></p><p>No, they are not interchangeable, because they can't be compared accordingly as it is two very different time periods all together.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flynn, post: 1279923, member: 537"] Your observations right or wrong is just that. Your opinions/observations The golden era of flaming was like The Attitude Era in the WWE. That time will never be duplicated. Too many talented writers haunting a handful of small obscure forums causing havoc at huge online boards. This incarnation of what flaming has turned into is an abomination and blasphemy. But hey we gotta work with what we got, right? The newer generation of shit talkers may not be what we are used to, but it is flaming to an extent. Sans the political discourse, and the LGBTQ community. While homos have always been easy marks online, this newer version of trolls use it like it's a teething bottle. You have bad mouthed certain "flamers," and the whole flaming thing in general at one point, even with you vacating some boards over it. No, the flaming isn't what brings you back. I get it, it's the people. But most of those people are flaming or trolling. So by proxy you come out here for the people, but the people are flaming, something now you say shouldn't be coupled in with the older iterations. I can accept anything anyone says. It's just when their answers change like a clock in a 24-hour period, I start to wonder what they are actually saying. On one hand you dislike this newer generation of flaming, and don't want it to be called that, yet you participate in what you say shouldn't be compared with 1990's-2000's level of flaming. Isn't that kinda restrictive and contradictory on your part. Garraty, Garraty...you mean to tell me that admin annoys you so, that you need the little semen chaser on ignore? I see it as one of the downsides of having an open mind. I feel that even shlong suckers like admin can perhaps even teach me something if the planets were to align. I see. So what have you been doing the last 6 or so years? You've been out here telling others to fuck off...most recently LotusToast. Are you just merely "interacting?" I'd hate to think that you and the rest of the forum come on here acting like you do in real life. What you were doing is flaming. Something you say doesn't exist in this time period or/and should not be defined as such. No, they are not interchangeable, because they can't be compared accordingly as it is two very different time periods all together. [/QUOTE]
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Meltdown
Flame Match Discussion Thread....
