Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MrNiceGuy" data-source="post: 1401991" data-attributes="member: 261">I can pretty much assume a cop is going to drive 80 in a 65 because allowing themselves to speed even if not an emergency is par for the course of being a cop.&nbsp; Meanwhile, any of us do 80 in a 65 &amp; we're hit with super speeder fines &amp; higher auto insurance bills for years on end.That being said... you can't just act like a cop is gestapo and you're freedom fighter resistance by refusing lawful commands.That's retarded.&nbsp; And you will lose.&nbsp; Bigly.&nbsp; Or hugely... depending on your preferred&nbsp; Trumpisms.Supreme Court has ruled on different occasions police don't have duty to protect specific persons but public at large.So the cops can stand outside a school shooting &amp; proclaim they are protecting the public at large by not letting the shooter out while letting the specific individuals inside die by the shooter's hands because cops are too pussy to go in.I did say we are a work in progress.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MrNiceGuy, post: 1401991, member: 261"] I can pretty much assume a cop is going to drive 80 in a 65 because allowing themselves to speed even if not an emergency is par for the course of being a cop. Meanwhile, any of us do 80 in a 65 & we're hit with super speeder fines & higher auto insurance bills for years on end. That being said... you can't just act like a cop is gestapo and you're freedom fighter resistance by refusing lawful commands. That's retarded. And you will lose. Bigly. Or hugely... depending on your preferred Trumpisms. Supreme Court has ruled on different occasions police don't have duty to protect specific persons but public at large. So the cops can stand outside a school shooting & proclaim they are protecting the public at large by not letting the shooter out while letting the specific individuals inside die by the shooter's hands because cops are too pussy to go in. I did say we are a work in progress. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification