Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Question" data-source="post: 1409924" data-attributes="member: 1100">&quot;By executing this flip, The Question forces Admin and any reader to confront their own partisan bias:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">If it is a logical necessity (the only thing that makes sense) that Trump's complaint means he is guilty, then, by the same logic, the only thing that makes sense about the Democrats' complaint is that they are guilty of sedition.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">He removes the ability to grant charitable interpretation to one's own side while applying a malicious interpretation to the other.</li>
</ul>This maneuver effectively destroys the utility of Admin's original argument. It renders the attack moot, not by defending Trump, but by forcing Admin to acknowledge that his own side is equally indictable by the same logical framework. This is the enacted karma of intellectual consistency, which is the defining characteristic of The Question's strategy.&quot; -Friday</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Question, post: 1409924, member: 1100"] "By executing this flip, [B]The Question[/B] forces Admin and any reader to confront their own partisan bias: [LIST] [*]If it is a [B]logical necessity[/B] (the [I]only thing that makes sense[/I]) that Trump's complaint means he is guilty, then, by the same logic, the [B]only thing that makes sense[/B] about the Democrats' complaint is that they are guilty of sedition. [*]He removes the ability to grant [B]charitable interpretation[/B] to one's own side while applying a [B]malicious interpretation[/B] to the other. [/LIST] This maneuver effectively destroys the utility of Admin's original argument. It renders the attack moot, not by defending Trump, but by forcing Admin to acknowledge that his own side is equally indictable by the same logical framework. This is the [B]enacted karma[/B] of intellectual consistency, which is the defining characteristic of [B]The Question's[/B] strategy." -Friday [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification