Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Reggie_Essent" data-source="post: 1082463" data-attributes="member: 1186">It took you this long to come up with that?&nbsp; You suck at debate, sweetheart.And reading through this wall, it is clear now that you must be an academic because your response is filled with meaningless gobbledygook and cut n pastes from your Democrat Hysteria websites.You cite &quot;privacy rights?&quot;&nbsp; We're talking about the American People's tax dollars here, Annie Condom.&nbsp; Are you telling me that the American People do not have an unalienable right to know where every single penny of their tax dollars are being spent? When business is done with the Public, there is no expectation nor right to &quot;privacy&quot; because it's PUBLIC.You cite &quot;potential for misuse?&quot;&nbsp; That's just fucking dumb.&nbsp; Anything and everything can &quot;potentially&quot; be misused, you thick dumb bint.You cite &quot;Government Overreach?&quot;&nbsp; This is really fucking stupid as well. Last I checked, this is all about REDUCING the size, scale and &quot;reach&quot; of government.&nbsp; Or did you miss that part because you were too busy whining about the scary orange clown that molested you as a child?You cite &quot;Potential destructive effect on financial freedom&quot; and go on to say &quot;If individuals know that every financial move is publicly visible, they might alter their spending or investment behavior in ways that limit their economic freedom or distort market dynamics.&quot;&nbsp; I would remind you AGAIN that public business is PUBLIC and there is no expectation nor right to privacy.&nbsp;&nbsp; If the grifters &quot;alter&quot; their investing behavior and the lack of those investments alter market dynamics because the grifters are no longer investing their ill-gotten gains, then the market will adjust and the grifters (Democrats all) will end up begging for quarters under freeway overpasses as they deserve.You cite &quot;national Security and economic stability.&quot;&nbsp; I admit that the economic stability of the Democrat scum grifting filth who have been stealing our money for decades just might be effected a little bit, but fuck them.&nbsp; They're all criminals and they suck.&nbsp; As for national security, not an issue.&nbsp; Our economic policy is directed by the Executive of the Executive Branch, not some parasite bureaucrat who hopefully will be retired or fired very soon.Then there's this:Hmm ... what does that remind me of?&nbsp; Oh yeah!&nbsp; This:<img src="https://pomf2.lain.la/f/ctlnp2e6.jpeg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />You really do suck at debate, Annie Condom.&nbsp;&nbsp; I'm so disappointed.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Reggie_Essent, post: 1082463, member: 1186"] It took you this long to come up with that? You suck at debate, sweetheart. And reading through this wall, it is clear now that you must be an academic because your response is filled with meaningless gobbledygook and cut n pastes from your Democrat Hysteria websites. You cite "privacy rights?" We're talking about the American People's tax dollars here, Annie Condom. Are you telling me that the American People do not have an unalienable right to know where every single penny of their tax dollars are being spent? When business is done with the Public, there is no expectation nor right to "privacy" because it's PUBLIC. You cite "potential for misuse?" That's just fucking dumb. Anything and everything can "potentially" be misused, you thick dumb bint. You cite "Government Overreach?" This is really fucking stupid as well. Last I checked, this is all about REDUCING the size, scale and "reach" of government. Or did you miss that part because you were too busy whining about the scary orange clown that molested you as a child? You cite "Potential destructive effect on financial freedom" and go on to say "If individuals know that every financial move is publicly visible, they might alter their spending or investment behavior in ways that limit their economic freedom or distort market dynamics." I would remind you AGAIN that public business is PUBLIC and there is no expectation nor right to privacy. If the grifters "alter" their investing behavior and the lack of those investments alter market dynamics because the grifters are no longer investing their ill-gotten gains, then the market will adjust and the grifters (Democrats all) will end up begging for quarters under freeway overpasses as they deserve. You cite "national Security and economic stability." I admit that the economic stability of the Democrat scum grifting filth who have been stealing our money for decades just might be effected a little bit, but fuck them. They're all criminals and they suck. As for national security, not an issue. Our economic policy is directed by the Executive of the Executive Branch, not some parasite bureaucrat who hopefully will be retired or fired very soon. Then there's this: Hmm ... what does that remind me of? Oh yeah! This: [IMG]https://pomf2.lain.la/f/ctlnp2e6.jpeg[/IMG] You really do suck at debate, Annie Condom. I'm so disappointed. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification