Menu
Home
Forum Rules
Store
Donate
Meltdown Mayhem Hacks ⚔︎
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Political Fray
People who think there was sufficient fraud to change the outcome of the 2020 elwction should read this.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oerdin" data-source="post: 305518" data-attributes="member: 128"><p>William Barr's account comes off as true and clear. There simply was not any evidence of substa8voter fraud. Trump did lose and it is far past time to accept that truth. Also Trump's actions really did damage both the country and the Republican Party. Now, that said, Democrats did legally change a hell of a lot of voting rules at the last second claiming they were temporary measures due to the pandemic and that was dirty as hell but legal. Legalizing ballot harvesting was especially corrupt as was universal mail in voting especially when tied with ballot harvesting. Dirty but legal.</p><p></p><p>Republicans, rightly, moved to remove the supposedly temporary emergence changes Democrats had passed in various states and then Dems started lying and claiming restoring existing laws by ending the temporary pandemic rules was some how "voter suppression" which was a complete lie out of Dems. Just like the Dem claim that requiring a I.D. to vote (something all three bipartisan commissions in the last 40 years recommended) was somehow "racist" is a complete lie.</p><p></p><p>So, any way, here is a well written piece by The Atlantic about Barr's view of events following the 2020 election. It is well worth a read.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/06/william-barrs-trump-administration-attorney-general/619298/[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oerdin, post: 305518, member: 128"] William Barr's account comes off as true and clear. There simply was not any evidence of substa8voter fraud. Trump did lose and it is far past time to accept that truth. Also Trump's actions really did damage both the country and the Republican Party. Now, that said, Democrats did legally change a hell of a lot of voting rules at the last second claiming they were temporary measures due to the pandemic and that was dirty as hell but legal. Legalizing ballot harvesting was especially corrupt as was universal mail in voting especially when tied with ballot harvesting. Dirty but legal. Republicans, rightly, moved to remove the supposedly temporary emergence changes Democrats had passed in various states and then Dems started lying and claiming restoring existing laws by ending the temporary pandemic rules was some how "voter suppression" which was a complete lie out of Dems. Just like the Dem claim that requiring a I.D. to vote (something all three bipartisan commissions in the last 40 years recommended) was somehow "racist" is a complete lie. So, any way, here is a well written piece by The Atlantic about Barr's view of events following the 2020 election. It is well worth a read. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/06/william-barrs-trump-administration-attorney-general/619298/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Political Fray
People who think there was sufficient fraud to change the outcome of the 2020 elwction should read this.