Joe
Site Supporter
- Reaction score
- 4,201
...given the recent announcment that Parler will be shut down?
I commented on this before, but nobody said anything, so I thought I'd post a separate thread on the issue.
The activities of the Tech giants haven't gone unnoticed by reputable publications, webstes and news organizations.
It's one thing to silence an out of control President Trump, but to shut down an entire service because many members decided to abandon the likes of Facebook and Twitter is another issue.
It seems that the Big Tech Consortium (Apple, Facebook, Twitter, Google and others) have overstepped their bounds. That they are not acting in the best interests of public safety, but their own for financial gain and to kill off the competition.
Even major respected publications like the Wall Street Journal have remarked on these practices:
I commented on this before, but nobody said anything, so I thought I'd post a separate thread on the issue.
The activities of the Tech giants haven't gone unnoticed by reputable publications, webstes and news organizations.
It's one thing to silence an out of control President Trump, but to shut down an entire service because many members decided to abandon the likes of Facebook and Twitter is another issue.
It seems that the Big Tech Consortium (Apple, Facebook, Twitter, Google and others) have overstepped their bounds. That they are not acting in the best interests of public safety, but their own for financial gain and to kill off the competition.
Even major respected publications like the Wall Street Journal have remarked on these practices:
Can right-wing populist sentiment be banished from American life by the brute force of social-media censorship? We’re about to find out. After Wednesday’s mob invasion of the Capitol that disrupted the counting of electoral votes, big tech firms have moved, aggressively and in unison, against Donald Trump and his supporters. The companies say they want to marginalize the violent fringe, but their censorship will grow it instead.
On Thursday and Friday came the Facebook and Twitter bans of Mr. Trump. Given the extraordinary circumstances, some commentators who normally oppose web censorship were untroubled.
An exception who deserves to be listened to is Alexei Navalny, the Russian democracy advocate and scourge of Vladimir Putin who was poisoned last year. He pointed out that, unlike the open election process that ousted Mr. Trump, social-media decisions to de-platform elected officials are unaccountable and arbitrary. “Don’t tell me he was banned for violating Twitter rules. I get death threats here every day for many years, and Twitter doesn’t ban anyone,” Mr. Navalny tweeted.
He added that while Twitter is a private company, “we have seen many examples in Russian and China of such private companies becoming the state’s best friends and enablers when it comes to censorship.”
Then the tech giants moved against Parler, Twitter’s free-speech competitor that is a haven for Trump supporters as well as more extreme figures.
Last edited: