Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wizer" data-source="post: 1401252" data-attributes="member: 1245">I thought the same. Well I first thought, &quot;wow here's an interesting thread that isn't about, well, the meaningless crap that gets splattered everywhere on these boards&quot;, then I thought [USER=9]@Joe[/USER], seriously dude, what are you thinking?Of course any company that replaces one or more workers with AI is going to save a bundle, and when it happens on a large scale you're talking mega-profits at the expense of more unemployed individuals.Sure in a fairy tale world, CEOs would give half a shit for the employees that are being displaced, and the devastating effects it has on their families and neighborhoods especially when entire towns are employed by one or more large companies.But [USER=9]@Joe[/USER], companies don't care. It's all about the money. So no, they won't retrain people so they can possibly hope to compete with AI.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wizer, post: 1401252, member: 1245"] I thought the same. Well I first thought, "wow here's an interesting thread that isn't about, well, the meaningless crap that gets splattered everywhere on these boards", then I thought [USER=9]@Joe[/USER], seriously dude, what are you thinking? Of course any company that replaces one or more workers with AI is going to save a bundle, and when it happens on a large scale you're talking mega-profits at the expense of more unemployed individuals. Sure in a fairy tale world, CEOs would give half a shit for the employees that are being displaced, and the devastating effects it has on their families and neighborhoods especially when entire towns are employed by one or more large companies. But [USER=9]@Joe[/USER], companies [i]don't care[/i]. It's all about the money. So no, they won't retrain people so they can possibly hope to compete with AI. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification