Menu
Home
Forum Rules
Store
Donate
Meltdown Mayhem Hacks ⚔︎
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Political Fray
The dialectics of Trumptardism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oerdin" data-source="post: 352692" data-attributes="member: 128"><p>The court literally hasn't done anything. Roe v. Wade is still law, abortion is a legal right, the court has simply not taken up a case where plantiffs claimed any regulation of a abortion is a violation of RvW. So, it seems the court agrees that abortion should be legal but that states can legally regulate it but not outlaw it.</p><p></p><p>It seems obvious to me that many states are going to have few, if any, regulations on abortion while other states will have some pretty strict regulations. The courts will have to figure out at some point how much regulations of which kind are legal and what are illegal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oerdin, post: 352692, member: 128"] The court literally hasn't done anything. Roe v. Wade is still law, abortion is a legal right, the court has simply not taken up a case where plantiffs claimed any regulation of a abortion is a violation of RvW. So, it seems the court agrees that abortion should be legal but that states can legally regulate it but not outlaw it. It seems obvious to me that many states are going to have few, if any, regulations on abortion while other states will have some pretty strict regulations. The courts will have to figure out at some point how much regulations of which kind are legal and what are illegal. [/QUOTE]
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Political Fray
The dialectics of Trumptardism
