Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Best Holliday" data-source="post: 1280191" data-attributes="member: 11635">So if I kill off a few MAGA, my defense is, well they weren't innocent saints you know. LoLz at sHitler.PS:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a fabricated text that has been repeatedly and definitively exposed as a fraudulent document and antisemitic forgery. Here's why and how it was acknowledged as false:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Plagiarism: The Protocols were largely plagiarized from earlier political satires and writings, most notably a French political satire titled Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864) by Maurice Joly and a chapter from an 1868 novel by Hermann Goedsche.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Journalistic Investigation: In 1921, The Times of London published a series of articles exposing the document as a forgery, comparing passages from the Protocols with those in Joly's work.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Legal Rulings: In 1935, a Swiss court ruled the Protocols a forgery and &quot;ridiculous nonsense&quot; in a trial against individuals distributing the text. A US Senate subcommittee in 1964 also declared the Protocols a &quot;vicious hoax&quot;.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Scholarly Consensus: Decades of research and analysis by historians and scholars have consistently affirmed the fraudulent nature of the Protocols. </li>
</ul>Despite the overwhelming evidence of it being a fabrication, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion continues to be promoted by antisemitic groups and individuals around the world as a supposed genuine document and tool to spread hatred and conspiracy theories against Jewish people. mAdam, you have a duck on your head.mAdam: No I haven't.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Best Holliday, post: 1280191, member: 11635"] So if I kill off a few MAGA, my defense is, well they weren't innocent saints you know. LoLz at sHitler. PS: The [I]Protocols of the Elders of Zion[/I] is a fabricated text that has been repeatedly and definitively exposed as a [B]fraudulent document and antisemitic forgery[/B]. Here's why and how it was acknowledged as false: [LIST] [*][B]Plagiarism:[/B] The Protocols were largely plagiarized from earlier political satires and writings, most notably a French political satire titled [I]Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu[/I] (1864) by Maurice Joly and a chapter from an 1868 novel by Hermann Goedsche. [*][B]Journalistic Investigation:[/B] In 1921, [I]The Times[/I] of London published a series of articles exposing the document as a forgery, comparing passages from the Protocols with those in Joly's work. [*][B]Legal Rulings:[/B] In 1935, a Swiss court ruled the Protocols a forgery and "ridiculous nonsense" in a trial against individuals distributing the text. A US Senate subcommittee in 1964 also declared the Protocols a "vicious hoax". [*][B]Scholarly Consensus:[/B] Decades of research and analysis by historians and scholars have consistently affirmed the fraudulent nature of the Protocols. [/LIST] Despite the overwhelming evidence of it being a fabrication, the [I]Protocols of the Elders of Zion[/I] continues to be promoted by antisemitic groups and individuals around the world as a supposed genuine document and tool to spread hatred and conspiracy theories against Jewish people. mAdam, you have a duck on your head. mAdam: No I haven't. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification