Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The New Holliday" data-source="post: 965377" data-attributes="member: 3122">LoLz - Lotus, it took me years to recruit you to ant-LibiConism, you having been a devout Demotard.&nbsp;.It's good that you are not party affiliated, but this has naught to do with that. Over the years you seem to have become more and more susceptible to conspiracy theory starting with 9/11 (&quot;pull it&quot;..LoLz) to more recent stuff like green meteors pilotted by 9 ft tall aliens who try to steal construction equipment in Las Vegas, to every wacky thing about JFK. The problem is, going to youtube and being fascinated by nutball theories presented by losers with a channel isn't thinking for yourself....it's just being gullible. The question is I think a good one. When you are presented with some &quot;information&quot; by someone who wants you to believe what they are saying, how do you verify what they are saying is even remotely factual? What, because some shadowed figure with electronically altered voice who is allegedly someone who knew someone who said something etc etc. and you can read about it in someone's book bla bla.. Shit, Lotus we went though all of this Kennedy stuff before. All of the second gunman etc nonsense has been refuted with factual timelines and forensics. Ruby was 1 hr late for the scheduled transfer of Oswald etc. etc.No vast conspiracy. The end....and what did &quot;pull it&quot; mean? Did it mean take down the buildings with pre-set explosives? Well, did it? LoLz</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The New Holliday, post: 965377, member: 3122"] LoLz - Lotus, it took me years to recruit you to ant-LibiConism, you having been a devout Demotard. [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)].[/COLOR]It's good that you are not party affiliated, but this has naught to do with that. Over the years you seem to have become more and more susceptible to conspiracy theory starting with 9/11 ("pull it"..LoLz) to more recent stuff like green meteors pilotted by 9 ft tall aliens who try to steal construction equipment in Las Vegas, to every wacky thing about JFK. The problem is, going to youtube and being fascinated by nutball theories presented by losers with a channel isn't thinking for yourself....it's just being gullible. The question is I think a good one. When you are presented with some "information" by someone who wants you to believe what they are saying, how do you verify what they are saying is even remotely factual? What, because some shadowed figure with electronically altered voice who is allegedly someone who knew someone who said something etc etc. and you can read about it in someone's book bla bla. [COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]. [/COLOR]Shit, Lotus we went though all of this Kennedy stuff before. All of the second gunman etc nonsense has been refuted with factual timelines and forensics. Ruby was 1 hr late for the scheduled transfer of Oswald etc. etc. No vast conspiracy. The end. ...and what did "pull it" mean? Did it mean take down the buildings with pre-set explosives? Well, did it? LoLz [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification