Menu
Home
Forum Rules
Store
Donate
Meltdown Mayhem Hacks ⚔︎
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Political Fray
Vaccine mandates, masks, CRT, confirmation bias, rigged elections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dove" data-source="post: 458493" data-attributes="member: 535"><p>Who protects mass shooters? WE want them executed. We dont protect mass shooters gun rights at all.</p><p></p><p>Also your emotional argument about our "babies dodging bullets" is completely unreasonable because you arent looking at the situation objectively. You arent considering ALL the instances of our 2A SAVING lives.</p><p></p><p>You are ignoring all the things that could have been done to prevent the shooting and jumping RIGHT to "we need to change the Constitution".</p><p></p><p>Can you please address the fact that Ethan Crumbley had made several threats, had a history of disturbed behavior and actually had a countdown on insta to his shooting(several students didnt go that day) and all of it was ignored? That he already had the gun illegally?</p><p></p><p>And prove gun regulations work. Because Chicago shows they dont. All they've done is make it hard for law abiding poor minorities to excersize their rights and protect themselves.</p><p></p><p>Gun regulations would not have stopped that shooting Admin. Acting on threats and disturbed behaviour WOULD have. Why wasnt this situation addressed? Dont let the people responsible for keeping the students safe off the hook for thier negligence because you want a partisan anti 2A tool. Have a reasoned argument.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dove, post: 458493, member: 535"] Who protects mass shooters? WE want them executed. We dont protect mass shooters gun rights at all. Also your emotional argument about our "babies dodging bullets" is completely unreasonable because you arent looking at the situation objectively. You arent considering ALL the instances of our 2A SAVING lives. You are ignoring all the things that could have been done to prevent the shooting and jumping RIGHT to "we need to change the Constitution". Can you please address the fact that Ethan Crumbley had made several threats, had a history of disturbed behavior and actually had a countdown on insta to his shooting(several students didnt go that day) and all of it was ignored? That he already had the gun illegally? And prove gun regulations work. Because Chicago shows they dont. All they've done is make it hard for law abiding poor minorities to excersize their rights and protect themselves. Gun regulations would not have stopped that shooting Admin. Acting on threats and disturbed behaviour WOULD have. Why wasnt this situation addressed? Dont let the people responsible for keeping the students safe off the hook for thier negligence because you want a partisan anti 2A tool. Have a reasoned argument. [/QUOTE]
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Political Fray
Vaccine mandates, masks, CRT, confirmation bias, rigged elections