Menu
Home
Forum Rules
Store
Donate
Meltdown Mayhem Hacks ⚔︎
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Meltdown
We have a stripper and bouncer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dove" data-source="post: 361767" data-attributes="member: 535"><p>Its ALSO interesting how some people can rant and spew their opinions of other people, but then the second the scrutiny is upon them, it must mean the one scrutinizing is "crying" or "butthurt".</p><p></p><p>Its yet another example of avoiding responsibility and putting it on everyone else.</p><p></p><p>Like "omg this drug using stripper shouldnt be saying things I don't like, so here are the reasons I dont think she should speak!"</p><p></p><p>But then observations are made about them and their constant complaints, and once again it's because there is something wrong with the reader.....its never them. So the scrunity is invalidated because oh look....the scrutinizer MUST be upset or triggered. Based solely on the fact they dared observe something unflattering about them. </p><p></p><p>I mean.... let's over look the tears and rage required to actually start a thread about two people using something like that to begin with. Hahaha no its US who are crying just because we noticed the never ending hypocrisy of those who preach about being better than others when they clearly are not.</p><p></p><p>Have they not been attacking me because of things I went through in the past? Judging from the responses of other people saying "who cares, it's the past and it's not relevant to this"... it looks like they have been.</p><p></p><p>How is that never qualified as "triggered" and "crying" but every observation about them people make is labeled as some big emotional episode that it isnt? </p><p></p><p>Constantly criticizing and insulting people and crying foul if it's done back is weak. It sure looks like they wanna take shots, but cant deal with shots delivered back. </p><p></p><p>They should just say that. Just openly say</p><p></p><p>"Hey guys? I really hate all your opinions and your posts, and I intend to take shots at them and call you guys stoopid dummies and use things I know about you all to insult you everytime you guys post something i dont like. But i expect all of you to graciously accept this with humility, and never criticize me back in ways that make me feel bad....so if you do, I'll just accuse you of being butthurt. Because that's the only way anyone could ever criticize me in anyway. Because I see myself as so far above reproach that nothing said to me is ever valid, and it must be only because my stunning and insightful criticism of you peasents has you clearly shook and emo. K guys, thanx"</p><p></p><p>So that we all know the deal, yanno?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dove, post: 361767, member: 535"] Its ALSO interesting how some people can rant and spew their opinions of other people, but then the second the scrutiny is upon them, it must mean the one scrutinizing is "crying" or "butthurt". Its yet another example of avoiding responsibility and putting it on everyone else. Like "omg this drug using stripper shouldnt be saying things I don't like, so here are the reasons I dont think she should speak!" But then observations are made about them and their constant complaints, and once again it's because there is something wrong with the reader.....its never them. So the scrunity is invalidated because oh look....the scrutinizer MUST be upset or triggered. Based solely on the fact they dared observe something unflattering about them. I mean.... let's over look the tears and rage required to actually start a thread about two people using something like that to begin with. Hahaha no its US who are crying just because we noticed the never ending hypocrisy of those who preach about being better than others when they clearly are not. Have they not been attacking me because of things I went through in the past? Judging from the responses of other people saying "who cares, it's the past and it's not relevant to this"... it looks like they have been. How is that never qualified as "triggered" and "crying" but every observation about them people make is labeled as some big emotional episode that it isnt? Constantly criticizing and insulting people and crying foul if it's done back is weak. It sure looks like they wanna take shots, but cant deal with shots delivered back. They should just say that. Just openly say "Hey guys? I really hate all your opinions and your posts, and I intend to take shots at them and call you guys stoopid dummies and use things I know about you all to insult you everytime you guys post something i dont like. But i expect all of you to graciously accept this with humility, and never criticize me back in ways that make me feel bad....so if you do, I'll just accuse you of being butthurt. Because that's the only way anyone could ever criticize me in anyway. Because I see myself as so far above reproach that nothing said to me is ever valid, and it must be only because my stunning and insightful criticism of you peasents has you clearly shook and emo. K guys, thanx" So that we all know the deal, yanno? [/QUOTE]
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Meltdown
We have a stripper and bouncer
