Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dove" data-source="post: 720295" data-attributes="member: 535">I think you forcing Andrew Tate fandom onto me is just as patriarchal as Tate claiming that.&nbsp;I've said several times I do not support Andrew Tate.&nbsp; Yet you continue pretending I support him JUST because I dont agree that someone is guilty of a crime before I can even see evidence.&nbsp;I dont believe in weighted justice. I believe in TRUE justice.&nbsp;I dont like you, I think you are a misogynist prick....but if you were accused of a sex crime I wouldnt declare your guilt with no evidence. I would definately defend your dumb ass if you were being found guilty in the court of public opinion before any evidence was shown.&nbsp; Something YOU wouldnt do for me, I'll add.&nbsp;Because my standards are rooted in who I am. NOT who an accused person is. I think Tate is a scum bag. A gross grifting pornographer.&nbsp; Do I think he is a trafficker?&nbsp; I don't know. I havent seen enough compelling proof. Just regular gross sex industry shit and some BDSM. &nbsp;Also your logic that you use for Kyle Rittenhouse applied consistently would say that YOU believe the attack I endured was my fault because I shouldnt have been there. I was also a minor who was out on the streets late at night and put myself in a situation where I could have been killed. The only difference I didnt have a gun and I wasnt able to save myself.&nbsp; Its YOU who says if a minor is attacked while being somewhere they shouldnt be, the responsibility is on them. Not the attackers.&nbsp;You wont have this conversation, though...because you know your positions wont withstand the scrutiny. That's also another thing you blame on ME. If only I wasn't so &quot;hopeless&quot; and if I echoed your stances back to you.....only then would you have a human conversation with me. But I refuse to cooperate so I'm making you be an asshole.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dove, post: 720295, member: 535"] I think you forcing Andrew Tate fandom onto me is just as patriarchal as Tate claiming that. I've said several times I do not support Andrew Tate. Yet you continue pretending I support him JUST because I dont agree that someone is guilty of a crime before I can even see evidence. I dont believe in weighted justice. I believe in TRUE justice. I dont like you, I think you are a misogynist prick....but if you were accused of a sex crime I wouldnt declare your guilt with no evidence. I would definately defend your dumb ass if you were being found guilty in the court of public opinion before any evidence was shown. Something YOU wouldnt do for me, I'll add. Because my standards are rooted in who I am. NOT who an accused person is. I think Tate is a scum bag. A gross grifting pornographer. Do I think he is a trafficker? I don't know. I havent seen enough compelling proof. Just regular gross sex industry shit and some BDSM. Also your logic that you use for Kyle Rittenhouse applied consistently would say that YOU believe the attack I endured was my fault because I shouldnt have been there. I was also a minor who was out on the streets late at night and put myself in a situation where I could have been killed. The only difference I didnt have a gun and I wasnt able to save myself. Its YOU who says if a minor is attacked while being somewhere they shouldnt be, the responsibility is on them. Not the attackers. You wont have this conversation, though...because you know your positions wont withstand the scrutiny. That's also another thing you blame on ME. If only I wasn't so "hopeless" and if I echoed your stances back to you.....only then would you have a human conversation with me. But I refuse to cooperate so I'm making you be an asshole. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification