MAGAhead HOGseth's own mama says son a predator

HeadOn!

Apply DIRECTLY to the forehead!
Reaction score
-286
Location
HeadOn! Apply DIRECTLY to the forehead!
I guess being qualified and of decent character doesn't come into play.
The establishment attacks nominees falsely on those very criteria. As with Kavanaugh, so with Hegseth.
Being a contrarian just to thumb people in the eye is an immature way to operate.
And sometimes maturity has to be set aside. When it's David versus Goliath, David has license to kick that big fucker square in the ballsack, piss up his nose, and beat him into a coma. Then, and only then, are maturity and fair play back on the menu.
 
Reaction score
19,362
Location
California
The establishment attacks nominees falsely on those very criteria. As with Kavanaugh, so with Hegseth.

And sometimes maturity has to be set aside. When it's David versus Goliath, David has license to kick that big fucker square in the ballsack, piss up his nose, and beat him into a coma. Then, and only then, are maturity and fair play back on the menu.

His own mother said he treated women horribly. I don't believe that the accusations are false. Unproven, sure. But then the FBI didn't really vet beer bro Kav. And they weren't going to have Hegseth investigated at all.
 

Admin.

Make Arteriosclerosis Great Again
Reaction score
18,101
Location
I’m down by the ocean, and you’re not.
Nothing like a nazi cross on your chest to add to your resume.
jExopP2.png


Spelling matters!
 

HeadOn!

Apply DIRECTLY to the forehead!
Reaction score
-286
Location
HeadOn! Apply DIRECTLY to the forehead!
His own mother said he treated women horribly.
Privately, to him, in the heat of emotion. She also later recanted that email.
I don't believe that the accusations are false. Unproven, sure.
Then, on a practical level, false until proved.
But then the FBI didn't really vet beer bro Kav. And they weren't going to have Hegseth investigated at all.
Then they should, just as they should do to every nominee of all parties, or to no nominee of any party.

Principles are only worth the impartiality on which they are applied.
 
Reaction score
19,362
Location
California
Privately, to him, in the heat of emotion. She also later recanted that email.

Then, on a practical level, false until proved.

Then they should, just as they should do to every nominee of all parties, or to no nominee of any party.

Principles are only worth the impartiality on which they are applied.

So, in private she was lying to him about his behavior? Uhm, yeah, no.

They should all be vetted and with no artificial parameters erected by interested parties, as in those that nominate and support them.
 

Admin.

Make Arteriosclerosis Great Again
Reaction score
18,101
Location
I’m down by the ocean, and you’re not.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

It's a long-standing meme.
You want a guy that was cashiered out of the Guard for his extremist views and tats, he was fired from two Veterans Charitable organizations for drunkenness, what is it about him that makes you want him in the corner office at the Pentagon?
 

HeadOn!

Apply DIRECTLY to the forehead!
Reaction score
-286
Location
HeadOn! Apply DIRECTLY to the forehead!
Principles are only worth the impartiality on which they are applied.
Revisiting this on a tangential subject: I, myself, am... uneasy with Christian Nationalism. It has the potential to go to some very, very dark places. While I don't care for "revealed religions" generally, the Abrahamic variety have established a unique track record of hegemonic violence throughout their shared history.

From an impartial standpoint, the Separation clause must be enforced -- against all religions, as well as against any belief systems which, notwithstanding their secular trappings, functionally operate like religions.