The Royal Portraits - Pass or Fail?

[Joe]

 

[Lily]

She's a hag.

 

[Larry Loungelizard]

She's a hag.

So a soft pass?

 

[Lily]

So a soft pass?

Pass?

Yo, not a lesbian...but if I was...I wouldn't notice that hag.

She's been an ugly horse face her entire life. Clearly she was his suck up. Diana was an aristocrat and almost and almost as entitled as he was. Camilla is/was just the right kind of sycophant.

That's where some of their problems at least partially stemmed from, imo.

 

[Larry Loungelizard]

Pass?

Yo, not a lesbian...but if I was...I wouldn't notice that hag.

She's been an ugly horse face her entire life. Clearly she was his suck up. Diana was an aristocrat and almost and almost as entitled as he was. Camilla is/was just the right kind of sycophant.

That's where some of their problems at least partially stemmed from, imo.

No, I meant soft pass as in pass or fail.

 

[Lily]

No, I meant soft pass as in pass or fail.

Oh, as a portrait...I suppose it depicts her fairly accurately as a hag.

 

[Joe]

Oh, as a portrait...I suppose it depicts her fairly accurately as a hag.

Actually it's a decent portrait @Lily . Could be better but its passable

However the one of King Charles is poor.

Worst part is the portraits don't match at all. There's this blotchy red Portrait on the left and this cool subdued one on the right.

The perspective angle of Charles is off wasn't well chosen.

His head looks distorted like it does not belong on the rest of his body.

I've noticed with the advent of computers and AI the general quality of art and artists has declined significantly.

It's almost as if they lost their skills or the good artists are all dying off.

 

[Admin.]

She's a hag.

Oh I thought that was Cross Dress Hitler?