Trump's Ballroom

LotusBud

Site Supporter
Reaction score
11,472
Location
Portugal
The federal commission that oversees major White House projects, the National Capital Planning Commission, had
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on the ballroom’s construction plans. Its chairman later
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the demolition phase didn’t require approval — a distinction that’s a bit like saying the fire doesn’t start until the roof caves in.

In any other administration, this would be a scandal. In Trump’s case, it’s a governing principle.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Admin.

Release The Epstein Files.
Site Supporter
Reaction score
21,313
Location
Where the forest meets the sea.
We’ve received a lot of questions about Trump’s demolition of the White House East Wing.

Here’s how the process is supposed to work:
1. Initial Proposal: The White House is managed by the National Park Service (NPS) but used by the Executive Office of the President (EOP). Any proposed change, even by a sitting president, begins internally through the Office of the Curator and the White House Facilities Management Division.
2. Historic Review: The NPS, as custodian of the White House under the Presidential Residence Act and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), must review all alterations for compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA. This requires assessing potential impacts on historic and cultural resources in consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) and the D.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
3. Planning & Environmental Oversight: The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) evaluates all major federal projects in the National Capital Region, including work on the White House grounds, for design, planning, and environmental impacts under NEPA (the National Environmental Policy Act). Public comment and design reviews are part of that process.
4. Aesthetic Review: The U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (CFA) reviews and advises on the design and appearance of any exterior modifications to the White House or its grounds.
5. Final Authorization: After approvals from NPS, NCPC, and CFA, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the White House Chief Usher / Facilities Management Office finalize funding, scheduling, and logistics.

Only after completing this full process could any major construction or demolition legally begin.

Yet Trump ignored every step, acting unilaterally through executive order, bypassing oversight, and ordering demolition as if he were a monarch. The result: the people’s house, altered without the people’s consent.

More details:

Section 107, let’s talk about it.

The above process has always been the process taken, and here’s why.

Section 107 of the National Historic Preservation Act exempts the White House, the U.S. Capitol, and the Supreme Court from being legally required to go through the Act’s formal Section 106 review. In other words, the law doesn’t automatically force those branches to follow the same procedures as other federal buildings. That exemption exists only because each branch of government controls its own seat of power, it was never intended as a free pass to ignore preservation, planning, or environmental rules altogether.

In practice, every administration since the 1960s has followed the same review structure out of duty, accountability, and executive-branch policy. The White House is still federal property, managed by the National Park Service under the Presidential Residence Act and subject to Executive Order 11593, which requires federal agencies to protect and consult on historic resources. Major exterior or site work still triggers National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) and U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (CFA) design reviews, along with NEPA environmental assessments. Any project involving government resources must also comply with the Anti-Deficiency Act and federal ethics rules on funding and gifts.

So yes, Section 107 means the NHPA can’t force compliance, but presidents are still bound by a network of executive orders, planning statutes, environmental laws, and constitutional duties. That’s why the process described isn’t optional, it’s the framework that has always protected the people’s house from unilateral or politically motivated alteration.

These executive orders:

- Executive Order 11593 (1971) – Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment - Requires all federal agencies (including the Executive Office of the President) to “locate, inventory, and nominate to the National Register all properties under their control” and to consult with the Secretary of the Interior before altering historically significant structures. (Demolishing part of the White House without such consultation would conflict with this order.)
- Executive Order 12148 (1979), delegates emergency and historic property responsibilities to the Department of the Interior, reaffirming that federal agencies must protect historic resources even when exemptions exist.
 

The Prowler

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,232
Location
Canada
The federal commission that oversees major White House projects, the National Capital Planning Commission, had
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on the ballroom’s construction plans. Its chairman later
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the demolition phase didn’t require approval — a distinction that’s a bit like saying the fire doesn’t start until the roof caves in.

In any other administration, this would be a scandal. In Trump’s case, it’s a governing principle.

LotusBud did not write that.
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,206
Location
California
The federal commission that oversees major White House projects, the National Capital Planning Commission, had
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on the ballroom’s construction plans. Its chairman later
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the demolition phase didn’t require approval — a distinction that’s a bit like saying the fire doesn’t start until the roof caves in.

In any other administration, this would be a scandal. In Trump’s case, it’s a governing principle.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I hate what they did with the Rose Garden. A lovely garden turned into a resort patio with atrocious yellow and white stripped umbrellas...removing all the roses, bulbs and greenery.

I don't know what will happen with that ballroom, but it will be gaudy. He is atrocious in every way possible.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,790
Location
Chicagoland
I hate what they did with the Rose Garden. A lovely garden turned into a resort patio with atrocious yellow and white stripped umbrellas...removing all the roses, bulbs and greenery.

I don't know what will happen with that ballroom, but it will be gaudy. He is atrocious in every way possible.
I think it's hilarious when your Leftist Betters order you drones to be outraged about something and you all pick up the beat like trained organ grinder monkeys.

The fuck any of you care about a White House renovation project? The pictures of the demolition going on now that your Betters told you to be oh so upset about was built as an addition to the White House by FDR in 1942. It's not like it's the fucking Parthenon Trump is tearing down.

You Leftist Vermin are so pathetic!
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,206
Location
California
I think it's hilarious when your Leftist Betters order you drones to be outraged about something and you all pick up the beat like trained organ grinder monkeys.

The fuck any of you care about a White House renovation project? The pictures of the demolition going on now that your Betters told you to be oh so upset about was built as an addition to the White House by FDR in 1942. It's not like it's the fucking Parthenon Trump is tearing down.

You Leftist Vermin are so pathetic!

I care because it is a historic building that represents our country.

Wtf are you talking about?
 

Admin.

Release The Epstein Files.
Site Supporter
Reaction score
21,313
Location
Where the forest meets the sea.
What is so "historic" about an addition to the White House that was built in 1942?

Answer: Nothing.

Wtf are you talking about?
There are rules in place with procedures to follow, but Trump like the bull in a china shop that he is bypassed all of that and just started doing what he wants, and as usual the plot changes with each mood swing of Trump’s


The White House is not the personal property of the sitting president, it’s called the People’s House, not Trump’s Ego Trip.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,790
Location
Chicagoland
So nothing historic has happened since WW2? Is that what you're saying?
I'm saying that not one of you Lefties here really give the slightest fuck about a building renovation, but your Betters told you to be upset because Orange Man Bad. You are all sad pathetic followers constantly being led around by your nose rings.


There are rules in place with procedures to follow, but Trump like the bull in a china shop that he is bypassed all of that and just started doing what he wants, and as usual the plot changes with each mood swing of Trump’s
You are even more pathetic than Lily. You don't know jack shit about "rules and procedures" beyond the fevered rants you read at OccupyDemocrats and then cut and paste here as if they are your words. Go fuck yourself, you brain dead cum stain.
 

250910

18610412
Site Supporter
Reaction score
-748
Location
251022.01
The federal commission that oversees major White House projects, the National Capital Planning Commission, had
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on the ballroom’s construction plans. Its chairman later
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
the demolition phase didn’t require approval — a distinction that’s a bit like saying the fire doesn’t start until the roof caves in.

In any other administration, this would be a scandal. In Trump’s case, it’s a governing principle.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
RWrdWuZ.jpeg
 

Lily

Site Supporter
Reaction score
23,206
Location
California
I'm saying that not one of you Lefties here really give the slightest fuck about a building renovation, but your Betters told you to be upset because Orange Man Bad. You are all sad pathetic followers constantly being led around by your nose rings.



You are even more pathetic than Lily. You don't know jack shit about "rules and procedures" beyond the fevered rants you read at OccupyDemocrats and then cut and paste here as if they are your words. Go fuck yourself, you brain dead cum stain.

That's utter bullshit. These people are trash and they're making the WH in their image, trashy.
 

The Prowler

Site Supporter
Reaction score
4,232
Location
Canada
Notice how none of these idiots showing fake outrage has ever given a good reason that the East Wing was important to them?

Did they even know what the East Wing was used for before Googling it over the past few days?

Their fake outrage is as pathetic as their constant virtue signalling.


Demolishing the East Wing needed to happen. Get over it, you phony victims wannabes.
 

Admin.

Release The Epstein Files.
Site Supporter
Reaction score
21,313
Location
Where the forest meets the sea.
Terrorists tried to destroy the White House in 2001 with a hijacked plane. 24 years later the President is destroying the White House himself and accepting a plane from people funding terrorists.