Admin is in the Epstein files

[Jack]

Civilly found liable for defamation for denying an accusation which was never proved in a criminal trial.

There's no such fucking thing as 'civilly convicted', you sloppy mountain of stupidity.

It was a jury trial and they found him guilty as charged. The only difference was the specific way NY determines rape.

Speaking of that the appeals court struck down his appeal on EJC this morning. Funny that eh?

 

[Larry Loungelizard]

It was the thing with you and the yak and the sprinkler.

Damn. How the shit did they find out? Looks I'll have to change my handle to Jose Jalapeno and move to Uzbekistan.

 

[The Cuntess]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Does this include the donkeys you suck off? Who’s a pervert?

I prefer it WITH MY HUSBAND, you fucking idiot. Is that some gotcha for you and your klan of geriatric degenerates? Lol

Waiting for the DMV receipts, Gary Glitter

 

[Jack]

Damn. How the shit did they find out? Looks I'll have to change my handle to Jose Jalapeno and move to Uzbekistan.

on a steeeeek.

 

[The Cuntess]

I just threw up in my mouth a little.

What a fucking hypocrite.

I’m sure you did as you prefer fellatio with men

 

[Larry Loungelizard]

on a steeeeek.

So glad someone got the reference.

 

[The Question]

Damn. How the shit did they find out? Looks I'll have to change my handle to Jose Jalapeno...

... on a steek.

 

[Larry Loungelizard]

... on a steek.

Ditto on my reply to Jack.

 

[The Question]

It was a jury trial and they found him guilty as charged.

It was a civil case. You don't get 'convicted' except out of a criminal trial.

And you know that.

 

[Jack]

It was a civil case. You don't get 'convicted' except out of a criminal trial.

And you know that.

80 million says otherwise.

Guilty as charged. He was found GUILTY.

 

[The Cuntess]

lol @ jack being grossed out at a man and women having sex. Lord, this is too easy

 

[Jack]

So digital forced penetration is still sexual abuse.

So he's a sexual abuser then. He was accused of it and found guilty of it.

That, by definition makes him a sexual abuser.

 

[The Question]

80 million says otherwise.

Guilty as charged. He was found GUILTY.

That's not a conviction.

And this isn't a Disney movie.

You can't just 'really, really, REEEEEEEEEally want it bad enough' for 'found liable' to turn into 'conviction.'

That's not how it works.

 

[Jack]

That's not a conviction.

And this isn't a Disney movie.

You can't just 'really, really, REEEEEEEEEally want it bad enough' for 'found liable' to turn into 'conviction.'

That's not how it works.

Yes, in May 2023, a federal jury in New York found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll, awarding her $5 million in damages.
AP News +1
Key Details of the Verdict:

• Civil Liability, Not Criminal Conviction: This was a civil case, not a criminal trial. Trump was found "liable" (responsible) rather than "guilty" of a crime, as the statute of limitations for criminal charges had passed.
• Sexual Abuse vs. Rape: The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (specifically, sexual battery), but did not find him liable for rape under New York's narrow legal definition of the term.
• Judge's Clarification: Following the verdict, Judge Lewis Kaplan clarified that based on the evidence, the act found by the jury met the common definition of rape, and that the accusation was "substantially true".
• Defamation: The jury found Trump liable for defamation for calling Carroll's allegations a "hoax" and a "lie".
• Second Trial ($83.3M): In January 2024, a second jury awarded Carroll an additional $83.3 million in a separate defamation lawsuit against Trump.
  FindLaw +6

Appeals:
A federal appeals court upheld the $5 million verdict on December 30, 2024, and a separate appeals court upheld the $83.3 million judgment in September 2025. Trump has stated his intention to appeal the rulings.

And that appeals court rejected said appeal just this morning.

Next?

 

[Jack]

we can split hairs all day over semantics. Trump was and by definition still then must be a sexual abuser of women. Including underage ones.

Only EJC has been able to take it this far. The rest have so far been successfully silenced.

So you're ok with an abuser of women running the country?

 

[The Question]

Yes, in May 2023, a federal jury in New York found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll, awarding her $5 million in damages.
AP News +1
Key Details of the Verdict:

• Civil Liability, Not Criminal Conviction: This was a civil case, not a criminal trial. Trump was found "liable" (responsible) rather than "guilty" of a crime, as the statute of limitations for criminal charges had passed.
• Sexual Abuse vs. Rape: The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (specifically, sexual battery), but did not find him liable for rape under New York's narrow legal definition of the term.
• Judge's Clarification: Following the verdict, Judge Lewis Kaplan clarified that based on the evidence, the act found by the jury met the common definition of rape, and that the accusation was "substantially true".
• Defamation: The jury found Trump liable for defamation for calling Carroll's allegations a "hoax" and a "lie".
• Second Trial ($83.3M): In January 2024, a second jury awarded Carroll an additional $83.3 million in a separate defamation lawsuit against Trump.
  FindLaw +6

Appeals:
A federal appeals court upheld the $5 million verdict on December 30, 2024, and a separate appeals court upheld the $83.3 million judgment in September 2025. Trump has stated his intention to appeal the rulings.

And that appeals court rejected said appeal just this morning.

Next?

Next is where you refuse to post the following:

"Okay, so fine, you were right. It wasn't a criminal trial, so it wasn't a conviction, just like you said."

 

[Reggie_Essent]

we can split hairs all day over semantics. Trump was and by definition still then must be a sexual abuser of women. Including underage ones.

Only EJC has been able to take it this far. The rest have so far been successfully silenced.

So you're ok with an abuser of women running the country?

Is E. Jean Carroll that incredibly ugly cunt who claimed Trump finger banged her in a store dressing room but couldn't remember which store or even what year it happened?

I don't believe that one for a second. Trump likes hot women and that cunt ain't.

 

[The Question]

Is E. Jean Carroll that incredibly ugly cunt who claimed Trump finger banged her in a store dressing room but couldn't remember which store or even what year it happened?

I don't believe that one for a second. Trump likes hot women and that cunt ain't.

Which is why a civil jury was perfectly happy to find him liable -- the burden of proof is way lower in a civil trial. Nobody had to prove he did a fucking thing, all the jury had to do was side against him because Orange Man Bad.

And dipshits like Admong want to equate that with proof.

 

[Jack]

Next is where you refuse to post the following:

"Okay, so fine, you were right. It wasn't a criminal trial, so it wasn't a conviction, just like you said."

Oh, you're absolutely correct about that.

Now answer my question, Question.

 

[Jack]

Is E. Jean Carroll that incredibly ugly cunt who claimed Trump finger banged her in a store dressing room but couldn't remember which store or even what year it happened?

I don't believe that one for a second. Trump likes hot women and that cunt ain't.

She was hot when he was finger fucking her in the lingerie try on room at Bergdorf Goodman. Exactly his type. He even confused her for Maples at the trial who was his wife at the time of the abuse..

 

[The Question]

She was hot when he was finger fucking her in the lingerie try on room at Bergdorf Goodman. Exactly his type. He even confused her for Maples at the trial who was his wife at the time of the abuse..

You, uh... think that's 'hot', do ya?

 

[Jack]

You, uh... think that's 'hot', do ya?

He did. What I think is irrelevant. Same goes for you.

 

[The Question]

So you're ok with an abuser of women running the country?

Compound questions don't get answered, and you know better than to even try that shit with me.

 

[Jack]

Compound questions don't get answered, and you know better than to even try that shit with me.

I win.

Thanks for playin' playa. Next time you try to insult "leftists" remember this exchange.

 

[The Question]

I win.

What did you win? You tried a shitty, duplicitous trick that you know doesn't work with me, and got reminded that it doesn't work with me.

You think that's a win?

Fine.

You may eat one crayon.

 

[Larry Loungelizard]

S

She was hot when he was finger fucking her in the lingerie try on room at Bergdorf Goodman. Exactly his type. He even confused her for Maples at the trial who was his wife at the time of the abuse..

Something about her cheeks screams of cosmetic surgery. It doesn't do her good.

 

[Jack]

What did you win? You tried a shitty, duplicitous trick that you know doesn't work with me, and got reminded that it doesn't work with me.

You think that's a win?

Fine.

You may eat one crayon.

I'm sorry I forgot this. This was taken just before the assault. I guess reggie just like them fat assed and vampirish

 

[Larry Loungelizard]

I'm sorry I forgot this. This was taken just before the assault. I guess reffie just like them fat assed and vampirish

Yep, she went under the knife.

 

[Jack]

Yep, she went under the knife.

She was a fuckin hottie when he went after her. I'm tired of people making shit up to suit their lying ass narrative.

and he (or the estates the way he's playing it) is going to pay her 85 mil for finger fucking her, lying about it and defaming her over it.

 

[Seamajor]

I’m sure you did as you prefer fellatio with men

You like it in your face. Careful how you answer Tractor Ass