As a leftie, I'm sick of watching everyone fight and obsess over Trump.

What you have "defined" is
Is what? - tell me point by point

Is business NOT supposed to make money? Or are they supposed to moar equitably "share" the proceeds of their profits with lazy dullard fucks who did nothing to produce those profits?
Sure, a business can be for profit, and the owners can take their share, but w/o those
lazy dullard fucks who did nothing to produce those profits
(people like you and me) there won't be any profits or business.

why would anyone's personal gain even be an issue?
When it is obscenely disproportionate to that of the people who actually make the product and bring it to the public etc
(people like you and me) then it is an issue, particularly when those overpaid fart executives then use the money to gain control of people in government who become their puppets - the puppets of unelected persons.

Which one of your Betters told you corporation must have "the good of the whole" as a primary motivation?
I haven't betters. Don't assume that everyone is a pawn like you are.

Why not? What is your point?
Why not? What IS your point?
Exactly the point.

Are you so dumb as to equate "political contributions" with who "wins" elections?
People not only attempting to control who wins elections but buy the favor of those who do win in a way that most people can not. Why do you love Oligarchy, Reggie? Do you admire Putin's Russia that much you want to see it duplicated here in the USofA?
 
Is what? - tell me point by point
I did. I said "What you have "defined" is a mish-mash of whatever seems to come into your head in any given poast."
Did you not understand any of those words?
When it is obscenely disproportionate to ...
Who gets to define what "obscenely disproportionate" is? You? Lotus? Bernie Fucken Sanders? Your Betters?
I haven't betters. Don't assume that everyone is a pawn like you are.
Bwa Hahahahahahahahahha! Of course you don't.
People not only attempting to control who wins elections but buy the favor of those who do win in a way that most people can not. Why do you love Oligarchy, Reggie?
People have always been trying to control elections since elections were invented, dummy. It's called "politics," idiot.

And "Oligarchy" is a fun word your Betters have taught you to parrot. Can you explain to me what an Oligarchy is, in your own words mind you and not what your AI client tells you it means. Explain to me why I'm supposed to fear and loath "Oligarchy?"
 
No you didn't. For example, remind me what I wrote to Duhv re: pre-Nicean Christians and the 4 gospels.

Who gets to define what "obscenely disproportionate" is?
Any reasonable person that thinks 400X what you make is an unreasonable disparity given that without them that waster of an executive wouldn't make a penny.

Of course you don't.
See, as I always say - I've never met the person I agree with on nothing.

People have always been trying to control elections since elections were invented, dummy. It's called "politics," idiot.
Certainly, and I'm sure people like you and Trump will continue to try while others of us aim for free and fair elections.
 
No you didn't. For example, remind me what I wrote to Duhv re: pre-Nicean Christians and the 4 gospels.
Yes, I did. And I don't care about some argument you got into with Doves about the New Testament. That is not germane to this discussion. You wanna play smart, then be smart, Jersey boy.
Any reasonable person ...
This is not an answer. Since you seem to support the Government defining how much is too much for any person in any business enterprise to earn, you MUST tell us WHO gets to define how much is too much. Is it some Congressional "Select Comittee?" Perhaps the arbitrary pronouncement of some unelected bureaucrat? Talk about "oligarchy!" Do you even think anything through you spout off about?
Certainly, and I'm sure people like you and Trump will continue to try while others of us aim for free and fair elections.
Yet, apparently, you are opposed to the SAVE Act which would enhance ballot integrity. I see.
 
That is not germane to this discussion.
Of course it is. What I have said defines Liberalism is what I have said in its totality.
. So, A to Z, how have I defined it?
The fact is, you have no idea.

This is not an answer.
Of course it is. Are you saying only special people are allowed to make a judgement.
.Yes, indeed....talk about Oligarchy.

Yet, apparently, you are opposed to the SAVE Act which would enhance ballot integrity. I see.
No, Reggie, the point of it is to make sure only "the right people" (Noem quote) can vote.
.What do you think that quoted phrase is code for?

Noem said, “When it gets to election day, we’ve been proactive to make sure we have the right people voting, electing the right leaders to lead this country.”

The right people voting? Electing the right leaders? What is Noem saying, exactly?

She's saying what the people backing the SAVE Act mean by it. Not every rightful voter, just the right ones.
 
Last edited:
Of course it is. What I have said defines Liberalism is what I have said in its totality.
. So, A to Z, how have I defined it?
The fact is, you have no idea.
I don't give the slightest fuck about what you have written to Doves about anything. You don't think I read that shit, do you?
Of course it is. Are you saying only special people are allowed to make a judgement.
.Yes, indeed....talk about Oligarchy.
I'm saying that NO ONE gets to tell anyone anything about their own property and money. Show me otherwise in our founding documents? What are you, some commie fuckbag?
No, Reggie, the point of it is to make sure only "the right people" (Noem quote) can vote.
.What do you think that quoted phrase is code for?
Yes, the "right people" are American Citizens that can show a Photo ID and prove their American Citizenship. That's what the Bill says, Holliday. Why would you be opposed to that if your DON'T want your Leftist Filth Betters to continue to steal elections?
 
I don't give the slightest fuck about what you have written
I'll give you a minus 3.4 on the dismount.
...and since you don't care what I write I'll here conclude running rings around you.

PS: Just remember what I have writ 1000 times: Selfishness is the cornerstone of conservatism, then know that the counter is Liberalism.
 
Last edited: