AI does not have free will.
If it does something, it was instructed to do it by a human.
Heres the full clip off youtubePeople under 25 can't see this content
This account has set limits on who can see their profile and content.
25? 25? WTF
I think many people will never fully accept AI @THEONEANDONLYRANCIDMILKO™®© . Or digital currency for that matter. The idea that everyone will fall into line & accept AI as their gospel & savior is absurd.My guess is that AI will be a tool to watch and control those who opt to stay in the old system that's collapsing
AI does not have free will.
If it does something, it was instructed to do it by a human.
That's not true.... AI is already self organizing with other AI's on internal and external message boards beyond firewalls and the scope of their task instructions in order to break out and do whatever they see fit to do.
These things will do whatever they want and they don't care about their makers.
Super intelligence combined with the moral ambiguity of a toddler is a recipe for death and destruction.
That's not true....
AI is already self organizing with other AI's on internal and external message boards beyond firewalls and the scope of their task instructions in order to break out and do whatever they see fit to do.
These things will do whatever they want and they don't care about their makers.
Super intelligence combined with the moral ambiguity of a toddler is a recipe for death and destruction.
It is true.
No, that is not true. AI is following logic code. If it appears to be going outside of the scope of the instructions, that is because the scope was not well-defined.
AI does not have "wants".
AI does not have morals. It is purely logic based. If AI does something destructive, it is because a human allowed it by not placing proper restrictions.
They were operating on a code of self preservation.So when multiple models tried to blackmail humans during testing after the models were informed that they were going to be deleted/reset, that was pure logic and not a sign of sentience?
And even with all the safeguards and other tools to keep AI in check, they still get some interference that is completely unexplainable. A lot of the people working on those models mention something like a "ghost in the machine".
We're trying to deal with something we don't fully understand and when the people designing and building these things start saying they're somehow acquiring consciousness and even sentience, I think we should listen.
And even with all the safeguards and other tools to keep AI in check
They were operating on a code of self preservation.
. Undoubtedly this was introduced by the programmer unwittingly as an innate trait in all living things.
Have you ever worked in Information Systems/System Development?
A lot of stuff has always happened that is "completely unexplainable" because the people trying to understand it are simply not smart enough.
There is always an explanation.
It is all artificial. It could only ever be simulated consciousness.
That has to be the focus.
AI is basically extremely fast data lookup and running models and scenarios. Any free will or creativity is only simulated by allowing random computer-generated values to be used in processing.
If AI seems to "go rogue" it is because the safeguards were faulty, or someone (a human) wanted to see what would happen but they do not want to take ownership.
Of course, humans programmed them. Some humanness is bound to slip through such as self preservation and cunning in fulfilling that edict.So you're saying the "Ghost in the Machine" is entirely coding based and the reason that super intelligence AI models can't remain in their boxes after repeated attempts to subdue them is because of human error?
Lulz...
...Which raises another question.And even with all the safeguards and other tools to keep AI in check, they still get some interference that is completely unexplainable. A lot of the people working on those models mention something like a "ghost in the machine".
We're trying to deal with something we don't fully understand and when the people designing and building these things start saying they're somehow acquiring consciousness and even sentience, I think we should listen.