Remember when Democrats used claim elections qere stolen from them?

[Oerdin]

Because I do.

 

[Lokmar]

These hypocritical democRAT cunts ALWAYS cheat, then use the failures as an excuse for their own cheating! They did it in 2000 and it didnt work so they cried. They did it with Al Frankens race in Mn until they won. They thought they did it for hillary but cheated in the wrong states so they had a meltdown. They pulled the same bullshit again in 2020 only in strategic states and stole that election!

 

[Holliday1881]

Because I do.

Hey, lil buddy - lay off the booze. It's only 7 AM.

PS: Even Pat Buchannan said no way he got so many votes and Gore won.
What a better world we would be living in today had Gore been president those 8 fatal years.

 

[Lokmar]

Because I do.

Hey, lil buddy - lay off the booze. It's only 7 AM.

PS: Even Pat Buchannan said no way he got so many votes and Gore won.
What a better world we would be living in today had Gore been president those 8 fatal years.

LOL! Hardly! We'd already be living without electricity and $10/gal gas! Of course maybe the revolution would have already happened and you'd be dead!

 

[Holliday1881]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

For the ensuing eight years, and particularly after the Iraq War began, alarm and disgust at the Bush presidency only grew more and more intense. Many on the left, including those who shared a deep distaste for Bill Clinton’s horse-trading centrism, were describing the administration as

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

long before it had ended.

This was hardly a matter of sour grapes after Mr Gore’s loss. The embarrassments, outrages and horrors were legion. Even leaving aside the Iraq disaster and the abuses of the wider

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

– under which could be filed extraordinary rendition and torture, Abu Ghraib, Blackwater’s Nisour Square massacre, and much else besides – there came the drip-drip-drip erosion of civil liberties, the tax cuts brazenly favouring the wealthiest Americans, and the disastrous response to Hurricane Katrina.

Alarm at the state of the Bush-era economy was in the air long before the 2008 financial crash; at the start of 2007, economist Joseph Stiglitz lamented that “There is no threat of America’s being displaced from its position as the world’s richest economy. But our grandchildren will still be living with, and struggling with, the economic consequences of Mr. Bush.”

As for the environment, Mr Gore’s signature cause, one of the Bush administration’s first major international moves was to back out of the Kyoto Agreement, which Mr Gore himself had signed.

The following years saw the administration drag its feet, and in some ways even go backwards, and by its last days, things looked dire. The House of Representatives’ Democratic-led Global Warming Committee

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

in 2007: “While the first 100 days of the Bush administration initiated perhaps the worst period of environmental deregulation in American history, the last 100 days of a Bush presidency could be even worse.”

That the damage done by the Bush years all came down to a few thousand votes in Florida only made it more enraging. And yet today, with the US furiously divided on almost every conceivable issue and the integrity of its democracy in serious doubt, the Bush years barely register a blip in the popular imagination. (Thanks trumptards)

 

[Lokmar]

So owlgore woulda apologized to the dune coons for making them blow us up on 911 and Saddam, Uday, and Qusay would still be alive along with the Taliban being stronger than ever. Al Qaeda would still be the varsity team, never allowing ISIS to get out of the crib! One thing that wouldnt have changed though is democRATs still would have made all those bad loans to niggers and white trash that caused the 2007/2008 economy to collapse! Then again, we might not have had 8 years of president nigger failure!

 

[LotusBud]

Because I do.

Yeah. An election decided by the Supreme Court, who rules FOR the guy who lost by half a million votes, and whose deciding votes came down to a difference of fewer than 550 votes, with Bush beating Gore by ONLY the 5 electoral votes that were granted to him by Floriduh, is ABSOLUTELY the same as a guy who lost by 7 million votes and almost 100 electoral votes. So I really get your attempt at making this look like some sort of logical analogy.

 

[Dove]

Because I do.

Hey, lil buddy - lay off the booze. It's only 7 AM.

PS: Even Pat Buchannan said no way he got so many votes and Gore won.
What a better world we would be living in today had Gore been president those 8 fatal years.

No shit.

Probably because the monoparty puts in who THEY want.

No one is saying there is no cheating. We are saying when the cheating benefits you.....you guys suddenly spew bullshit about "secure" it all is.

You are hypocrites. Plain and simple. You deserve when the monoparty fucks you.

Trump winning 2016 wasnt supposed to happen. The people won that round....whether you like it or not.

 

[Dove]

Because I do.

Yeah. An election decided by the Supreme Court, who rules FOR the guy who lost by half a million votes, and whose deciding votes came down to a difference of fewer than 550 votes, with Bush beating Gore by ONLY the 5 electoral votes that were granted to him by Floriduh, is ABSOLUTELY the same as a guy who lost by 7 million votes and almost 100 electoral votes. So I really get your attempt at making this look like some sort of logical analogy.

Biden didn't even win primaries and you think he won more votes than Obama.

 

[Joe]

These hypocritical democRAT cunts ALWAYS cheat, then use the failures as an excuse for their own cheating! They did it in 2000 and it didnt work so they cried. They did it with Al Frankens race in Mn until they won. They thought they did it for hillary but cheated in the wrong states so they had a meltdown. They pulled the same bullshit again in 2020 only in strategic states and stole that election!

Yeah, but then you're bitching, whining and complaining about the same things the Democrats were in 2000, Lokmeer.

So really, you're no better than those 2000 Democrats, Lokmeer!

What you should really lobby for is electoral reform & the implementation of a national elections system to make it more robust..

Anyways, yer a typical example of those who don't learn from history are condemned to repeat it, Bud.

All the flaws which were never addressed nor fixed came back to haunt the Republicans 20 years later.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Because I do.

Yeah. An election decided by the Supreme Court, who rules FOR the guy who lost by half a million votes, and whose deciding votes came down to a difference of fewer than 550 votes, with Bush beating Gore by ONLY the 5 electoral votes that were granted to him by Floriduh, is ABSOLUTELY the same as a guy who lost by 7 million votes and almost 100 electoral votes. So I really get your attempt at making this look like some sort of logical analogy.

are you STILL crying over the genius in governance that is the electoral college

piss off, cause you're just too stupid to understand it's purpose and value and can only regurgitate "slave states" like your narrative operators instruct you to when presented with it's purpose and wisdom.

 

[Dove]

These hypocritical democRAT cunts ALWAYS cheat, then use the failures as an excuse for their own cheating! They did it in 2000 and it didnt work so they cried. They did it with Al Frankens race in Mn until they won. They thought they did it for hillary but cheated in the wrong states so they had a meltdown. They pulled the same bullshit again in 2020 only in strategic states and stole that election!

Yeah, but then you're complaining and whining about the same things the Democrats were in 2000, Lokmeer.

So really, you're no better than those 2000 Democrats, Lokmeer!

What you should really lobby for is electoral reform & the implementation of a national elections system to make it more robust..

Anyways, yer a typical example of those who don't learned from history are condemned to repeat it, Bud.

All the flaws which were never addressed nor fixed came back to haunt the Republicans 20 years later.

I voted for Gore. It was my first election.

My grandmother actually used that and Michigans local elections to teach me it's always bent towards the candidates who will best serve the establishment. And she was right.

You gotta really know what a Republican IS to see where the line is. There are RINOs for a reason. It's not the neat box people want it to be.

I'm definately convinced that 9/11 was known about by our government and allowed to happen so we could go back to war. Do I think Bush is a real Republican? Fuck no I dont.

We should start asking people what they mean by 'Republican" when they say they are one.

I dont know about you ......but I've noticed the meaning of these "labels" getting muddied and not so discernable and the strong ideology seeping in is Marxism......not liberalism or even Democratic.

Everytime we get a good democrat in office, they either get smeared or silenced or shot. Same with true Republicans . ..they are always attacked as well. Look at the ones who get trashed and silenced....you'll see people that genuinely care about the people.

 

[Lokmar]

These hypocritical democRAT cunts ALWAYS cheat, then use the failures as an excuse for their own cheating! They did it in 2000 and it didnt work so they cried. They did it with Al Frankens race in Mn until they won. They thought they did it for hillary but cheated in the wrong states so they had a meltdown. They pulled the same bullshit again in 2020 only in strategic states and stole that election!

Yeah, but then you're bitching, whining and complaining about the same things the Democrats were in 2000, Lokmeer.

So really, you're no better than those 2000 Democrats, Lokmeer!

What you should really lobby for is electoral reform & the implementation of a national elections system to make it more robust..

Anyways, yer a typical example of those who don't learn from history are condemned to repeat it, Bud.

All the flaws which were never addressed nor fixed came back to haunt the Republicans 20 years later.

No dummy. Republicans werent cheating. BIG difference!

 

[Dove]

And just for clarity......I'm sure Gore was supposed to win 2000. I do not think Bush was the monoparty flavor of that year. Though I definately think his time there changed that.

 

[Oerdin]

There were exhaustive studies after the Nov 2000 election and even if all of Gore's cases were upheld it would not have changed the outcome of the election. Fact. This was proven beyond doubt 20 years ago.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

There were exhaustive studies after the Nov 2000 election and even if all of Gore's cases were upheld it would not have changed the outcome of the election. Fact. This was proven beyond doubt 20 years ago.

not for clinically dense idiots like Lotus it wasn't

 

[Joe]

There were exhaustive studies after the Nov 2000 election and even if all of Gore's cases were upheld it would not have changed the outcome of the election. Fact. This was proven beyond doubt 20 years ago.

I think what ultimately defeated the Democrats that year were the Democrats themselves.

The forerunners of the Bernie Bots or the Progressive wing of the party.

A lot of them played absolutely stupid and they split the party vote by voting for Nader's Green Party.

Truth is, the Democrats didn't even have to win Florida, just New Hampshire where the Greens split the Democratic vote and handed the state to the Republicans. But the Greens also split the vote in Florida handing it to Bush.

Like...can they spell Stupid?

And it sure made a difference. They ended up inflicting all that pain on themselves, their nation and perhaps the rest of the world by splitting the vote like that.

They screwed themselves.

Those are what you call immature ill-informed stupid voters.

 

[Dove]

There were exhaustive studies after the Nov 2000 election and even if all of Gore's cases were upheld it would not have changed the outcome of the election. Fact. This was proven beyond doubt 20 years ago.

I think what ultimately defeated the Democrats that year were the Democrats themselves.

The forerunners of the Bernie Bots or the Progressive wing of the party.

A lot of them played absolutely stupid and they split the party vote by voting for Nader's Green Party.

Truth is, the Democrats didn't even to win Florida, just New Hampshire where the Greens split the Democratic vote and handed the state to the Republicans.

Like...can they spell Stupid?

And it sure made a difference. They ended up inflicting all that pain on themselves, their nation and perhaps the rest of the world by splitting the vote like that.

They screwed themselves.

8 years of democrats and it took Trump to stop America from bombing the middle east.

It would have happened the same way for the world anyway. Gore probably would have been worse. Like fucking 26k drone dropping Obama.

 

[Joe]

There were exhaustive studies after the Nov 2000 election and even if all of Gore's cases were upheld it would not have changed the outcome of the election. Fact. This was proven beyond doubt 20 years ago.

I think what ultimately defeated the Democrats that year were the Democrats themselves.

The forerunners of the Bernie Bots or the Progressive wing of the party.

A lot of them played absolutely stupid and they split the party vote by voting for Nader's Green Party.

Truth is, the Democrats didn't even to win Florida, just New Hampshire where the Greens split the Democratic vote and handed the state to the Republicans.

Like...can they spell Stupid?

And it sure made a difference. They ended up inflicting all that pain on themselves, their nation and perhaps the rest of the world by splitting the vote like that.

They screwed themselves.

8 years of democrats and it took Trump to stop America from bombing the middle east.

It would have happened the same way for the world anyway. Gore probably would have been worse. Like fucking 26k drone dropping Obama.

Only the Democrats wouldn't have invaded Iraq.

Bush had a plan to invade the place from the beginning even before becoming President.

The Democrats were content to keep Saddam in power.

so what likely would have happened under a Gore Presidency is the US would have continued to do what you've indicated.

Bomb the place with drones to contain Saddam. But no invasion.

 

[Oerdin]

While we are at it we should remember when Democrats lied and claimed reopening the economy and letting people work would "kill millions upon millions of people". That was all a complete lie and fabrication. We need to collectively remember that Democrats lied to us.

Governors like DeSantis and Abbot deserve credit for actually following the science instead of the lies out of Democrats who were trying to destroy the economy for political reasons.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[LotusBud]

There were exhaustive studies after the Nov 2000 election and even if all of Gore's cases were upheld it would not have changed the outcome of the election. Fact. This was proven beyond doubt 20 years ago.

Bullshit. Utter fucking bullshit. You can't gaslight me on that. I read almost everything published about the FACTS of the case. That was a coup by SCOTUS, straight up.

 

[Oerdin]

 

[Joe]

Biden should step down before the 2024 election and force the Democrats to hold a convention rather than allowing Kamala to succeed him.

She doesn't seem like Presidential Material who could unite a country let alone the Democrats to support her in an election.

It would likely cause division within the Democratic Party, but they might end up getting a better more suitable candidate for the Presidency than her.

 

[Dove]

There were exhaustive studies after the Nov 2000 election and even if all of Gore's cases were upheld it would not have changed the outcome of the election. Fact. This was proven beyond doubt 20 years ago.

I think what ultimately defeated the Democrats that year were the Democrats themselves.

The forerunners of the Bernie Bots or the Progressive wing of the party.

A lot of them played absolutely stupid and they split the party vote by voting for Nader's Green Party.

Truth is, the Democrats didn't even to win Florida, just New Hampshire where the Greens split the Democratic vote and handed the state to the Republicans.

Like...can they spell Stupid?

And it sure made a difference. They ended up inflicting all that pain on themselves, their nation and perhaps the rest of the world by splitting the vote like that.

They screwed themselves.

8 years of democrats and it took Trump to stop America from bombing the middle east.

It would have happened the same way for the world anyway. Gore probably would have been worse. Like fucking 26k drone dropping Obama.

Only the Democrats wouldn't have invaded Iraq.

Bush had a plan to invade the place from the beginning even before becoming President.

The Democrats were content to keep Saddam in power.

so what likely would have happened under a Gore Presidency is the US would have continued to do what you've indicated.

Bomb the place with drones to contain Saddam. But no invasion.

Possibly. I really feel like I doubt this. Democrats are some of the worse war mongers fucks and people think of them as "for the people" and the compassionate party so they dont watch them as closely.

 

[Lokmar]

There were exhaustive studies after the Nov 2000 election and even if all of Gore's cases were upheld it would not have changed the outcome of the election. Fact. This was proven beyond doubt 20 years ago.

Bullshit. Utter fucking bullshit. You can't gaslight me on that. I read almost everything published about the FACTS of the case. That was a coup by SCOTUS, straight up.

The only bullshit part is that if democRATs would have been allowed to recount 10 billion times like they did in Al Frankens race, they would have won. Its called CHEATING, you stupid bitch!

 

[Holliday1881]

Has anyone seen that big mouthed, 50 years late, know nothing fool, Duhv?

.If you happen to run into the putinist dupe
remind her she is delinquent on the 40 Murders by BLM thread
. and until she follows through on her claim with details
. all she writes is nothing but unsubstantiated propagandist tripe.

 

[Lokmar]

Has anyone seen that big mouthed, 50 years late, know nothing fool, Duhv?

.If you happen to run into the putinist dupe
remind her she is delinquent on the 40 Murders by BLM thread
. and until she follows through on her claim with details
. all she writes is nothing but unsubstantiated propagandist tripe.

Meanwhile, I'm gonna remind you that Saint Trump, Best President in 150 years, won the 2020 election!

 

[Joe]

Has anyone seen that big mouthed, 50 years late, know nothing fool, Duhv?

.If you happen to run into the putinist dupe
remind her she is delinquent on the 40 Murders by BLM thread
. and until she follows through on her claim with details
. all she writes is nothing but unsubstantiated propagandist tripe.

Meanwhile, I'm gonna remind you that Saint Trump, Best President in 150 years, won the 2020 election!

Yer gonna be remindin' people for a long time...Lokmeer!

 

[Oerdin]

Biden should step down before the 2024 election and force the Democrats to hold a convention rather than allowing Kamala to succeed him.

She doesn't seem like Presidential Material who could unite a country let alone the Democrats to support her in an election.

It would likely cause division within the Democratic Party, but they might end up getting a better more suitable candidate for the Presidency than her.

There plan is most definitely for Biden to step down slightly past the two year mark so Harris can try for a 10 year presidencies.

 

[Holliday1881]

There plan is

Did you mean That there plan is, or Thems there plan is, Oderstink?