Everyone not left is a terrorist!!!

[Dove]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

 

[Scrawny The Ghost]

Wanting to murder every politician doesn't make me a terrorist or extremist. I think i'm pretty mild compared to most people. "Violence doesn't discredit a movement"

I would never hurt an innocent person

 

[Dove]

Killing power crazed abusive politicians is the most American shit you can do besides tax evasion.

 

[Admin.]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

 

[Lokmar]

I approve of every RIGHT wing person that commits tax fraud. Every LEFTIST that does it should be executed.

 

[Dove]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

 

[Murdock]

Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. We are the descendants of people trying to escape religious persecution and yet you’re attributing “transient causes” to abolishing the basic civil rights afforded to us by our constitution and reiterated by the emancipation declaration. ALL men are created equal, not just the ones who look like and share the same faith as you.

Your justifications of this are trivial and point the most fear, concern and disdain towards the criminal element, which is already dealt with by the Courts. Your ideology wholeheartedly supports discrimination of anyone who isn’t just like you…. and that is what the right fails to understand. The left is far more empathic to the needs of society as a whole. Although, I don’t agree fully with either.

 

[Admin.]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

 

[Dove]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

 

[Admin.]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

 

[Dove]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

 

[Murdock]

Speaking of Federal Laws:

Civil Rights Act of 1964 ~ prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin (including membership in a Native American tribe).

 

[Admin.]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

 

[Dove]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

 

[Murdock]

For Breonna Taylor ~

Our Fourth Amendment bars the government from unreasonable search and seizure of an individual or their private property.

 

[Murdock]

For Jacob Blake ~

Our Fifth Amendment provides several protections for people accused of crimes. It states that serious criminal charges must be started by a grand jury. A person cannot be tried twice for the same offense (double jeopardy) or have property taken away without just compensation. People have the right against self-incrimination and cannot be imprisoned without due process of law (fair procedures and trials.)

 

[Lokmar]

For Jacob Blake ~

Our Fifth Amendment provides several protections for people accused of crimes. It states that serious criminal charges must be started by a grand jury. A person cannot be tried twice for the same offense (double jeopardy) or have property taken away without just compensation. People have the right against self-incrimination and cannot be imprisoned without due process of law (fair procedures and trials.)

Dumb nigger should have been shot dead. At least he wont be having anymore sprogs.

 

[Dove]

Why the fuck am I seeing the ignored content thing in my thread?

Did someone bring Lil Debbie's in here? She snortin around for Ho Hos?

 

[Murdock]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

 

[Lokmar]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

 

[Murdock]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

Please scroll back and read the part that you skipped over re blacks law definition of vigilante justice, slack-jawed moron.

 

[Admin.]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

 

[Murdock]

@Lokmar ~ so let’s say YOU are a black man in this country and I see you walking down my street in an HOA on a private road (hint: a private road is not private to the public, it only means it’s privately maintained) I can grab my gun and jump in my car. I can then follow you in my car, get out with a gun and walk up to you to ask you any line of questioning I feel is suitable and you’re supposed to NOT defend yourself?

 

[Murdock]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

See traitorous acts.

 

[Dove]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

The government is NOT the Constitution. The fuck?

Who said "over throw the Constitution"?

See what we mean about you useful idiots? Our government is gonna go full blown authoritarian and you think they ARE the Constitution. Scary shit, Admin.

 

[Lokmar]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

Please scroll back and read the part that you skipped over re blacks law definition of vigilante justice, slack-jawed moron.

Sorry, ya matress surfing whore, there was no vigilante justice there....EXCEPT by teeny,tiny,lil innocent tray tray. Had that dumb nigger not tried to give the white mexican a beat down, the cops would have showed, straightened it out, and everyone would have been on their way. The white mexicans gun fell out while sweet lil baby faced 2ft tall tray tray was pounding the white mexicans head on the ground, they wressled for it, the nigger got KA-BLOWIED! Buh bye stupid nigger! Dave Chapell should have added this to "When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong" skit.

 

[Admin.]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

See traitorous acts.

That covers Treason, or acts against the Constitution. Not the Constitution rebelling against itself.

 

[Murdock]

For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.

That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

Please scroll back and read the part that you skipped over re blacks law definition of vigilante justice, slack-jawed moron.

Sorry, ya matress surfing whore, there was no vigilante justice there....EXCEPT by teeny,tiny,lil innocent tray tray. Had that dumb nigger not tried to give the white mexican a beat down, the cops would have showed, straightened it out, and everyone would have been on their way. The white mexicans gun fell out while sweet lil baby faced 2ft tall tray tray was pounding the white mexicans head on the ground, they wressled for it, the nigger got KA-BLOWIED! Buh bye stupid nigger! Dave Chapell should have added this to "When Keeping It Real Goes Wrong" skit.

That is your opinion and you are no legal expert that would have any authority to give such opinion based solely on speculation in the court of law.

 

[Admin.]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

......No.

The SCOTUS interprets law according to the Constitution. They dont legislate. Or enforce.

Thanks for showing why leftists dont belong in SCOTUS so we dont have to evoke the words in the Declaration.

So where in the structure of our Federal Government does the DOI come into play, ie what force of law does it hold?

Right so your argument is that our rights are secondary to whatever the federal government decides.

And you cool with that.

Answer the question Miss Dizz.

You asked where in the structure of our federal government is our right to overthrow the government? Right?

So you are saying if the federal government doesnt grant us permission to overthrow them....than over throwing is illegal.

Right?

So if the federal government decides one of our rights is inconvenient they just wont allow it, and we have to abide it.

That's your point right?

Admin....would a tyrannical government structure in the citizens right to overthrow it?

Do you think your spouse would never cheat, because they promised they wouldnt?

Just trying to accurately find your cuck level on the cuck scale.

I mean...."its not legal to overthrow the government" is the biggest cuck shit I've heard. Especailly from a guy who supports BLM burning down communities and killing innocent people.

Where in the USA Constitution is a revolution to overthrow that same Constitution addressed?

The government is NOT the Constitution. The fuck?

Who said "over throw the Constitution"?

See what we mean about you useful idiots? Our government is gonna go full blown authoritarian and you think they ARE the Constitution. Scary shit, Admin.

The Constitution is literally the contract that defines the structure of the Country, you simp.

SCOTUS's job is to determine what legal issues agree or disagree with the Constitution. Hello?

 

[Lily]

So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Would you cite the suicide pact in the Constitution, kthnxby.

Muh bad.

It's our Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I know I know tl:dr.

It's way over the leftwing reading ability and it's not spreading hateful propaganda so it's not interesting.

None the less it states how we should respond to the threat of our liberal order being upended.

Is it the SCOTUS that interprets and enforces the articles of the Declaration of Independence?

She doesn't know that there's a difference. Sssh, she's thinking. Hard. It gives her a headache.