Everyone not left is a terrorist!!!

Here you go A. Check this out

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I like how Zimmermans history of violence is relevant (and I agree with that) but when a criminal is a black rapist and such it's all "deerrr the past doesnt matter!" Which is bullshit.

If someone has a history of violence and abuse that is the best predictor of thier future and it should always be considered in court if they are in there for a violent crime.

Zimmerman is just another scum bag democrat.

in wiki, scroll past all that trial shit and get to his latter crimes and see what he has done AFTER... and he still has guns.... And he sold the gun he murdered Trayvon with for $250,000. He likes trying to sue people as well including Trayvons parents. He is truly pond scum.

Zimmerman shot Martin because he wanted to, not because he had to. He even lied to the court about how much money was being donated for his defense and that should provide everyone with enough insight as to what kind of person he was and how honest his account and recollection of what happened that night was in his testimony. The man LIES. Unfortunately, Trayvon was dead and could not give his side of the story. Trayvon’s murder was premeditated just like the stunt these hicks pulled under similar circumstances:


I was hoping for a response ffs...


No, you can't see her boobs!

I already have...


:GiggleBitch:
 
Here you go A. Check this out

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I like how Zimmermans history of violence is relevant (and I agree with that) but when a criminal is a black rapist and such it's all "deerrr the past doesnt matter!" Which is bullshit.

If someone has a history of violence and abuse that is the best predictor of thier future and it should always be considered in court if they are in there for a violent crime.

Zimmerman is just another scum bag democrat.

in wiki, scroll past all that trial shit and get to his latter crimes and see what he has done AFTER... and he still has guns.... And he sold the gun he murdered Trayvon with for $250,000. He likes trying to sue people as well including Trayvons parents. He is truly pond scum.

Zimmerman shot Martin because he wanted to, not because he had to. He even lied to the court about how much money was being donated for his defense and that should provide everyone with enough insight as to what kind of person he was and how honest his account and recollection of what happened that night was in his testimony. The man LIES. Unfortunately, Trayvon was dead and could not give his side of the story. Trayvon’s murder was premeditated just like the stunt these hicks pulled under similar circumstances:



Factually untrue. When the thug got shot he was on top of Zi.merman, bashing his head into the concrete, and screaming that he was going to kill Zimmerman. This is not an opinion bit a finding of fact.


Read the whole thread and catch up. You're clueless on this subject.


He already racially profiled Trayvon as a thug since he was black wearing a hoodie… even though he was a high school student with no record or history of violence and Zimmerman was a fat insurance investigator and obviously disgruntled neighborhood watch captain fueled by recent burglaries in the area.

If you grab a gun and pursue a pedestrian who isn’t on your property against the recommendation of the police after you call 911 and that pedestrian ends up shot and dead… that is premeditated and constitutes first degree murder.

One of the jurors even said "I don't want to judge, but I just want to say this could have been prevented had he not been up here." ~ like it is Trayvon’s fault for being a black teenager walking down the street in America wearing a hoodie SMH
 
He fit the description of someone who had recently broken into mtiple houses in the community. YOU are intersecting race and no one else.
 
3ebpfYZ8zrtGwjGRcWhRxMU4UXq9vaMR5sgCuPnxYNhaZRTi6hgM1iaJKVIWA4X0Yr-rG5OcRyLwmVchWcHfPLdNcZcqM1zC2WBbzAbKJQRvpQdP-poEvh7d-B69uubVtv144NBgaC7jbTwP819tUPmtnWJoDrlmd2k
 
Here you go A. Check this out

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I like how Zimmermans history of violence is relevant (and I agree with that) but when a criminal is a black rapist and such it's all "deerrr the past doesnt matter!" Which is bullshit.

If someone has a history of violence and abuse that is the best predictor of thier future and it should always be considered in court if they are in there for a violent crime.

Zimmerman is just another scum bag democrat.

in wiki, scroll past all that trial shit and get to his latter crimes and see what he has done AFTER... and he still has guns.... And he sold the gun he murdered Trayvon with for $250,000. He likes trying to sue people as well including Trayvons parents. He is truly pond scum.

Zimmerman shot Martin because he wanted to, not because he had to. He even lied to the court about how much money was being donated for his defense and that should provide everyone with enough insight as to what kind of person he was and how honest his account and recollection of what happened that night was in his testimony. The man LIES. Unfortunately, Trayvon was dead and could not give his side of the story. Trayvon’s murder was premeditated just like the stunt these hicks pulled under similar circumstances:



Factually untrue. When the thug got shot he was on top of Zi.merman, bashing his head into the concrete, and screaming that he was going to kill Zimmerman. This is not an opinion bit a finding of fact.


Read the whole thread and catch up. You're clueless on this subject.


He already racially profiled Trayvon as a thug since he was black wearing a hoodie… even though he was a high school student with no record or history of violence and Zimmerman was a fat insurance investigator and obviously disgruntled neighborhood watch captain fueled by recent burglaries in the area.

If you grab a gun and pursue a pedestrian who isn’t on your property against the recommendation of the police after you call 911 and that pedestrian ends up shot and dead… that is premeditated and constitutes first degree murder.

One of the jurors even said "I don't want to judge, but I just want to say this could have been prevented had he not been up here." ~ like it is Trayvon’s fault for being a black teenager walking down the street in America wearing a hoodie SMH


Zimmerman is absolutely diabolical and what is nuclear bomb strength diabolistic, he has gotten away with his murderous violence and is still allowed weapons.
 
For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.
That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

So you hate Mexican’s just a little bit less than you hate blacks. Gotcha.

Zimmerman isn't Mexican, he was from Peru.

I was well aware of that fact… I was just pointing out the obvious about Lokmar.

Aryan is worse.

Pardon?
 
This thread is a testimony to the sheer gullability of most women and how MSM propaganda can literally hypnotise them.

Fuck.....
 
Here you go A. Check this out

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I like how Zimmermans history of violence is relevant (and I agree with that) but when a criminal is a black rapist and such it's all "deerrr the past doesnt matter!" Which is bullshit.

If someone has a history of violence and abuse that is the best predictor of thier future and it should always be considered in court if they are in there for a violent crime.

Zimmerman is just another scum bag democrat.

in wiki, scroll past all that trial shit and get to his latter crimes and see what he has done AFTER... and he still has guns.... And he sold the gun he murdered Trayvon with for $250,000. He likes trying to sue people as well including Trayvons parents. He is truly pond scum.

Zimmerman shot Martin because he wanted to, not because he had to. He even lied to the court about how much money was being donated for his defense and that should provide everyone with enough insight as to what kind of person he was and how honest his account and recollection of what happened that night was in his testimony. The man LIES. Unfortunately, Trayvon was dead and could not give his side of the story. Trayvon’s murder was premeditated just like the stunt these hicks pulled under similar circumstances:



Factually untrue. When the thug got shot he was on top of Zi.merman, bashing his head into the concrete, and screaming that he was going to kill Zimmerman. This is not an opinion bit a finding of fact.


The large ladies of the Trayvon Martin fanclub deny this and claim Zimmerman made it up, despite the fact that several witnesses said the same thing.
 
So we are at this point now.


You realize how the media, in collusion with the current socialist regime, is brainwashing people to treat anyone who disagrees with them as “terrorists”?

Don’t you get how far these totalitarians are taking it?

If you still haven’t, I beg you to open your eyes. This is dangerous!

In the YouTube video of this newscast, the “journalist” literally says “this new terror threat is not based on any threats”…

We need to clean out these psychopaths. You know the Constitution gives us permission to over throw a government that has become this right?

Do you often feel threatened by your own Government, Dovey?

Actually yes, these days more than the norm too.

.....in which case, this video may be for you, Dovey:




....the Political Divide between Right vs Left WorldWide these days....

....explained in under 20 minutes!


Every conflict can be better summed up like this.

There are people who want to be left alone vs those who refuse to leave others alone.

I'll let you figure out who is who.
 
For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.
That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.
It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

Except that wasn't what happened was it? And since Trayvon, a juvenile, minding his own business, was attacked by an armed nutjob, isn't here to tell his side of the story, the jury weren't party to the whole truth. A guilty man walked free.
As I recall, the eyewitness stated trayvon was on top of zim, beating the fuck outta him.
 
For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.
That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.
It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

Except that wasn't what happened was it? And since Trayvon, a juvenile, minding his own business, was attacked by an armed nutjob, isn't here to tell his side of the story, the jury weren't party to the whole truth. A guilty man walked free.
As I recall, the eyewitness stated trayvon was on top of zim, beating the fuck outta him.

Was that before or after Zimmerman got out of his car with a gun and walked up to Trayvon to accusing him of being the neighborhood burglar?
 
For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.
That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.
It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

Except that wasn't what happened was it? And since Trayvon, a juvenile, minding his own business, was attacked by an armed nutjob, isn't here to tell his side of the story, the jury weren't party to the whole truth. A guilty man walked free.
As I recall, the eyewitness stated trayvon was on top of zim, beating the fuck outta him.

Zimmerman should have listened to police. He isnt in a position of authority. For all we know he could have been the first to lay hands.

Do you want a precedent set that a regular ass rando can detain you?
 
Get off fucking Trayvon!!! That nigger is GONE!!!!

Lets talk about how we are all a bunch of terrorists!!!
 
Supreme Court Decision on use of deadly force to protect personal property “defendant was not warranted under Civil Code section 50 in using deadly force to protect his personal property.

Where the character and manner of the burglary do not reasonably create a fear of great bodily harm, there is no cause for exaction of human life (State v. McIntyre) or for the use of deadly force (see generally 13 Stan.L.Rev. 566, 577). The character and manner of the burglary could not reasonably create such a fear unless the burglary threatened, or was reasonably believed to threaten, death or serious bodily harm.

Zimmerman was not the victim. He wasn’t even burglarized personally. Zimmerman was a perpetrator who got into his vehicle with a gun and stalked an unsuspecting pedestrian.
 
For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.
That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.
It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

Except that wasn't what happened was it? And since Trayvon, a juvenile, minding his own business, was attacked by an armed nutjob, isn't here to tell his side of the story, the jury weren't party to the whole truth. A guilty man walked free.
As I recall, the eyewitness stated trayvon was on top of zim, beating the fuck outta him.

Was that before or after Zimmerman got out of his car with a gun and walked up to Trayvon to accusing him of being the neighborhood burglar?
Did he point the gun at trayvon or brandish it in any way? The evidence is NOPE! Little asshole shouldnt have tried to keep it real and he'd still be alive. Instead, he's dead!
 
For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.
That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.
It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

Except that wasn't what happened was it? And since Trayvon, a juvenile, minding his own business, was attacked by an armed nutjob, isn't here to tell his side of the story, the jury weren't party to the whole truth. A guilty man walked free.
As I recall, the eyewitness stated trayvon was on top of zim, beating the fuck outta him.

Zimmerman should have listened to police. He isnt in a position of authority. For all we know he could have been the first to lay hands.

Do you want a precedent set that a regular ass rando can detain you?
Nope, not at all. Still, the white mexican wasnt guilty of murder or even manslaughter.
 
For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.
That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.
It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

Except that wasn't what happened was it? And since Trayvon, a juvenile, minding his own business, was attacked by an armed nutjob, isn't here to tell his side of the story, the jury weren't party to the whole truth. A guilty man walked free.
As I recall, the eyewitness stated trayvon was on top of zim, beating the fuck outta him.

Was that before or after Zimmerman got out of his car with a gun and walked up to Trayvon to accusing him of being the neighborhood burglar?
Did he point the gun at trayvon or brandish it in any way? The evidence is NOPE! Little asshole shouldnt have tried to keep it real and he'd still be alive. Instead, he's dead!

Trayvon was dead and couldn’t provide a statement. The fact that you’re willing to take Zimmerman’s statements as fact despite having proof that he lied to the court about various other things is relevant to this argument and further proves what we already know. You are racist.

The fact that you’re blaming Trayvon for his own murder shows how truly ignorant you are about the laws in this country.

I blame YOU and everyone who thinks like you for the Floyd riots because it was the Trayvon case that got us HERE.
 
For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.
That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.
It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

Except that wasn't what happened was it? And since Trayvon, a juvenile, minding his own business, was attacked by an armed nutjob, isn't here to tell his side of the story, the jury weren't party to the whole truth. A guilty man walked free.
As I recall, the eyewitness stated trayvon was on top of zim, beating the fuck outta him.

Was that before or after Zimmerman got out of his car with a gun and walked up to Trayvon to accusing him of being the neighborhood burglar?
Did he point the gun at trayvon or brandish it in any way? The evidence is NOPE! Little asshole shouldnt have tried to keep it real and he'd still be alive. Instead, he's dead!

Trayvon was dead and couldn’t provide a statement. The fact that you’re willing to take Zimmerman’s statements as fact despite having proof that he lied to the court about various other things is relevant to this argument and further proves what we already know. You are racist.

The fact that you’re blaming Trayvon for his own murder shows how truly ignorant you are about the laws in this country.

I blame YOU and everyone who thinks like you for the Floyd riots because it was the Trayvon case that got us HERE.
Zim was getting his ass beat, the gun fell out, trayvon said he was gonna kill him, they fought over the gun, trayvon died. Its as simple as that. Now if you wanna accuse him of impersonating a cop or whatever, fine. However, once the fight was on and zim was getting his head bashed in and disarmed, it was fair game. I realize a white mexican shooting a black kids pains you. I dont give 2 fux. People have looked this over thoroughly and decided it wasnt murder. I guess they like white mexicans more than niggers. LMFAO!
 
Here you go A. Check this out

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I like how Zimmermans history of violence is relevant (and I agree with that) but when a criminal is a black rapist and such it's all "deerrr the past doesnt matter!" Which is bullshit.

If someone has a history of violence and abuse that is the best predictor of thier future and it should always be considered in court if they are in there for a violent crime.

Zimmerman is just another scum bag democrat.

in wiki, scroll past all that trial shit and get to his latter crimes and see what he has done AFTER... and he still has guns.... And he sold the gun he murdered Trayvon with for $250,000. He likes trying to sue people as well including Trayvons parents. He is truly pond scum.

Zimmerman shot Martin because he wanted to, not because he had to. He even lied to the court about how much money was being donated for his defense and that should provide everyone with enough insight as to what kind of person he was and how honest his account and recollection of what happened that night was in his testimony. The man LIES. Unfortunately, Trayvon was dead and could not give his side of the story. Trayvon’s murder was premeditated just like the stunt these hicks pulled under similar circumstances:



Factually untrue. When the thug got shot he was on top of Zi.merman, bashing his head into the concrete, and screaming that he was going to kill Zimmerman. This is not an opinion bit a finding of fact.


So no black man has the right to defend themselves against some loon pursuing them in their car who then gets out with gun. Gotcha.


If you describe "defending" as violently attacking someone who had literally done nothing more than follow at a long distance then no. Defending involves someone first physically attacking you. The only one who attacked anyone was the thug Travon.
 
For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.
That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.
It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

Except that wasn't what happened was it? And since Trayvon, a juvenile, minding his own business, was attacked by an armed nutjob, isn't here to tell his side of the story, the jury weren't party to the whole truth. A guilty man walked free.
As I recall, the eyewitness stated trayvon was on top of zim, beating the fuck outta him.

Was that before or after Zimmerman got out of his car with a gun and walked up to Trayvon to accusing him of being the neighborhood burglar?
Did he point the gun at trayvon or brandish it in any way? The evidence is NOPE! Little asshole shouldnt have tried to keep it real and he'd still be alive. Instead, he's dead!

Trayvon was dead and couldn’t provide a statement. The fact that you’re willing to take Zimmerman’s statements as fact despite having proof that he lied to the court about various other things is relevant to this argument and further proves what we already know. You are racist.

The fact that you’re blaming Trayvon for his own murder shows how truly ignorant you are about the laws in this country.

I blame YOU and everyone who thinks like you for the Floyd riots because it was the Trayvon case that got us HERE.
Zim was getting his ass beat, the gun fell out, trayvon said he was gonna kill him, they fought over the gun, trayvon died. Its as simple as that. Now if you wanna accuse him of impersonating a cop or whatever, fine. However, once the fight was on and zim was getting his head bashed in and disarmed, it was fair game. I realize a white mexican shooting a black kids pains you. I dont give 2 fux. People have looked this over thoroughly and decided it wasnt murder. I guess they like white mexicans more than niggers. LMFAO!

YOU decided Trayvon was guilty because he is black.
 
Here you go A. Check this out

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I like how Zimmermans history of violence is relevant (and I agree with that) but when a criminal is a black rapist and such it's all "deerrr the past doesnt matter!" Which is bullshit.

If someone has a history of violence and abuse that is the best predictor of thier future and it should always be considered in court if they are in there for a violent crime.

Zimmerman is just another scum bag democrat.

in wiki, scroll past all that trial shit and get to his latter crimes and see what he has done AFTER... and he still has guns.... And he sold the gun he murdered Trayvon with for $250,000. He likes trying to sue people as well including Trayvons parents. He is truly pond scum.

Zimmerman shot Martin because he wanted to, not because he had to. He even lied to the court about how much money was being donated for his defense and that should provide everyone with enough insight as to what kind of person he was and how honest his account and recollection of what happened that night was in his testimony. The man LIES. Unfortunately, Trayvon was dead and could not give his side of the story. Trayvon’s murder was premeditated just like the stunt these hicks pulled under similar circumstances:



Factually untrue. When the thug got shot he was on top of Zi.merman, bashing his head into the concrete, and screaming that he was going to kill Zimmerman. This is not an opinion bit a finding of fact.


So no black man has the right to defend themselves against some loon pursuing them in their car who then gets out with gun. Gotcha.


If you describe "defending" as violently attacking someone who had literally done nothing more than follow at a long distance then no. Defending involves someone first physically attacking you. The only one who attacked anyone was the thug Travon.



Why was Zimmerman out of his car and on the sidewalk near Trayvon? Why was he holding a gun?


Superseding causation. Look it up!
 
For Trayvon Martin ~

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill was first introduced in 1918 by Representative Leonidas C. Dyer, a Republican from St. Louis, Missouri, in the United States House of Representatives as H.R. 11279.[1] It was intended to establish lynching as a federal crime.

Legal Definitions of Vigilantism and Lynchings:

Vigilantism ~ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses by lynching without legal authority.

Lynching ~ a form of violence in which a mob, under the pretext of administering justice without trial, executes a presumed offender, often after inflicting torture and corporal mutilation. The term lynch law refers to a self-constituted court that imposes sentence on a person without due process of law.
That dumb nigger fought the white mexican for the gun and lost, idiot.

That fucking piece of shit that murdered Trayvon should have gotten life in jail.
It wasnt murder if they fought over the gun and he shot in self defense. And from the testimony of witnesses and the physical evidence, thats what happened.

Except that wasn't what happened was it? And since Trayvon, a juvenile, minding his own business, was attacked by an armed nutjob, isn't here to tell his side of the story, the jury weren't party to the whole truth. A guilty man walked free.
As I recall, the eyewitness stated trayvon was on top of zim, beating the fuck outta him.

Was that before or after Zimmerman got out of his car with a gun and walked up to Trayvon to accusing him of being the neighborhood burglar?
Did he point the gun at trayvon or brandish it in any way? The evidence is NOPE! Little asshole shouldnt have tried to keep it real and he'd still be alive. Instead, he's dead!

Trayvon was dead and couldn’t provide a statement. The fact that you’re willing to take Zimmerman’s statements as fact despite having proof that he lied to the court about various other things is relevant to this argument and further proves what we already know. You are racist.

The fact that you’re blaming Trayvon for his own murder shows how truly ignorant you are about the laws in this country.

I blame YOU and everyone who thinks like you for the Floyd riots because it was the Trayvon case that got us HERE.
Zim was getting his ass beat, the gun fell out, trayvon said he was gonna kill him, they fought over the gun, trayvon died. Its as simple as that. Now if you wanna accuse him of impersonating a cop or whatever, fine. However, once the fight was on and zim was getting his head bashed in and disarmed, it was fair game. I realize a white mexican shooting a black kids pains you. I dont give 2 fux. People have looked this over thoroughly and decided it wasnt murder. I guess they like white mexicans more than niggers. LMFAO!
Even if he was "getting his ass beat" that was due to his wannabe cop stalking of a teen aged boy.
 
Here you go A. Check this out

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I like how Zimmermans history of violence is relevant (and I agree with that) but when a criminal is a black rapist and such it's all "deerrr the past doesnt matter!" Which is bullshit.

If someone has a history of violence and abuse that is the best predictor of thier future and it should always be considered in court if they are in there for a violent crime.

Zimmerman is just another scum bag democrat.

in wiki, scroll past all that trial shit and get to his latter crimes and see what he has done AFTER... and he still has guns.... And he sold the gun he murdered Trayvon with for $250,000. He likes trying to sue people as well including Trayvons parents. He is truly pond scum.

Zimmerman shot Martin because he wanted to, not because he had to. He even lied to the court about how much money was being donated for his defense and that should provide everyone with enough insight as to what kind of person he was and how honest his account and recollection of what happened that night was in his testimony. The man LIES. Unfortunately, Trayvon was dead and could not give his side of the story. Trayvon’s murder was premeditated just like the stunt these hicks pulled under similar circumstances:



Factually untrue. When the thug got shot he was on top of Zi.merman, bashing his head into the concrete, and screaming that he was going to kill Zimmerman. This is not an opinion bit a finding of fact.


So no black man has the right to defend themselves against some loon pursuing them in their car who then gets out with gun. Gotcha.


If you describe "defending" as violently attacking someone who had literally done nothing more than follow at a long distance then no. Defending involves someone first physically attacking you. The only one who attacked anyone was the thug Travon.


that is pure bs, you obviously never followed the story.