Wow. Good thing they had guns

[Lokmar]

I've got so many guns, I could never buy another one and still have more than I ever wanted. Libs cant do jack shit about it.

 

[The Prowler]

Misquote Alert!!!!

"think that."

That was very dishonest.

 

[Levon]

Misquote Alert!!!!

"think that."

That was very dishonest.

I'll consider revising my post after you fix the typos and other errors in yours.

 

[Blurt]

Coming from someone who doesn't know whether he's Arthur or Martha, that's a bit rich to say the least.

We've been over this before. Many times, in fact.

I'm Marthur. Or Artha. Your pick. You're the one who lives in a world where folks can only be Arthurs or Marthas.

It's a sad little backyard you live in, Scouse. Overgrown with weeds, hemmed in by a fence that looks more like cinder block walls. A mangy cur tethered to a spike by a three-foot chain in the middle of it all to keep you company.

I don't envy you, bro.

 

[Adam Hitler]

I'm Marthur. Or Artha. Your pick. You're the one who lives in a world where folks can only be Arthurs or Marthas.

Yes, it's called male and female, you know, a little known thing called gender? In case you didn't realise, this has been the standard for thousands of years.

I swear, you leftists are something else, you're so entitled and smug that you believe you can change the meaning of words and defy nature.

This is why most people regard you and your ilk to be loony headcases.

 

[Blurt]

This is why most people regard you and your ilk to be loony headcases.

Sez the poopybrain who thinks the Earth is flat, that we never went to the moon, that the edge of the world lies beyond Antarctica, that Hitler is alive, that Sam Applebaum is running the world from his deli at the corner of 51st St. and Broadway, and that his own name isn't the most Jewish name there is.

Oy vey, mein Schmuck!

 

[Lily]

This is why most people regard you and your ilk to be loony headcases.

Sez the poopybrain who thinks the Earth is flat, that we never went to the moon, that the edge of the world lies beyond Antarctica, that Hitler is alive, that Sam Applebaum is running the world from his deli at the corner of 51st St. and Broadway, and that his own name isn't the most Jewish name there is.

Oy vey, mein Schmuck!

He's an incredible schlemiel.

 

[Adam Hitler]

This is why most people regard you and your ilk to be loony headcases.

Sez the poopybrain who thinks the Earth is flat, that we never went to the moon, that the edge of the world lies beyond Antarctica, that Hitler is alive, that Sam Applebaum is running the world from his deli at the corner of 51st St. and Broadway, and that his own name isn't the most Jewish name there is.

Oy vey, mein Schmuck!

When have I ever claimed that the earth is flat or that we never went to the moon?

When you resort to lying, your desperation makes an unwanted appearance, just like that bulge downstairs in your charity shop-chic evening gown.

 

[Adam Hitler]

This is why most people regard you and your ilk to be loony headcases.

Sez the poopybrain who thinks the Earth is flat, that we never went to the moon, that the edge of the world lies beyond Antarctica, that Hitler is alive, that Sam Applebaum is running the world from his deli at the corner of 51st St. and Broadway, and that his own name isn't the most Jewish name there is.

Oy vey, mein Schmuck!

He's an incredible schlemiel.

 

[Blurt]

This is why most people regard you and your ilk to be loony headcases.

Sez the poopybrain who thinks the Earth is flat, that we never went to the moon, that the edge of the world lies beyond Antarctica, that Hitler is alive, that Sam Applebaum is running the world from his deli at the corner of 51st St. and Broadway, and that his own name isn't the most Jewish name there is.

Oy vey, mein Schmuck!

When have I ever claimed that the earth is flat or that we never went to the moon?

When you resort to lying, your desperation makes an unwanted appearance, just like that bulge downstairs in your charity shop-chic evening gown.

You're right. My bad. Your actual stance is that you "keep an open mind" about the possibility we live on a flat Earth.

An open mind, like a sieve. Or a gaping manhole.

 

[Adam Hitler]

You believe that there are 68 different genders, so shaming others for being "conspiracy theorists" is just a tad hypocritical, twinkle tits.

 

[LotusBud]

I'm Marthur. Or Artha. Your pick. You're the one who lives in a world where folks can only be Arthurs or Marthas.

Yes, it's called male and female, you know, a little known thing called gender? In case you didn't realise, this has been the standard for thousands of years.

I swear, you leftists are something else, you're so entitled and smug that you believe you can change the meaning of words and defy nature.

This is why most people regard you and your ilk to be loony headcases.

Why is it so incredibly difficult for you to understand that, though most people are either male or female, many people exist somewhere else on the spectrum, and IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN THAT WAY? Why are you so terrified of people who aren't exactly like you? It's really pathetic. I feel sorry for you.

I have a very simple metaphor for this that I try with thick-headed people. I am left-handed. Yes, by far most people are right-handed. But being left-handed is still perfectly normal and left-handed people are still capable of making contributions to society, and giving and getting love, and are nothing to be frightened of. We're just like righties in most ways. And we won't try to force you to be left-handed, even though everyone once tried to force us to be right-handed. So calm down and stop worrying about us. We can co-exist.

 

[Adam Hitler]

Yeah, transgenderism was definitely a thing in the past and not just a trend which has been introduced over the last 70 years or so.

 

[LotusBud]

Yeah, transgenderism was definitely a thing in the past and not just a trend which has been introduced over the last 70 years or so.

You don't seem to understand that the only thing different now is that surgeries and hormonal treatments are avaible now. If you could take those things back in a time machine, the takers would be everywhere. Don't deceive yourself so blatantly. It's just sad.

 

[Lokmar]

Yeah, transgenderism was definitely a thing in the past and not just a trend which has been introduced over the last 70 years or so.

You don't seem to understand that the only thing different now is that surgeries and hormonal treatments are avaible now. If you could take those things back in a time machine, the takers would be everywhere. Don't deceive yourself so blatantly. It's just sad.

I'd sooner travel back in time and bring faggit holocausts forward to today!

 

[Dove]

Thread Summary:

@LotusBud : This tragedy is not okay with me, and since the law is the only help for the victim's family I hope they use it.

@troglodytes: No, you shouldn't post about it cause you make us uncomfy. Since we can't say that aloud, we'll all just make fun of you and say you're wrong and it's just one of those things, therefore IT'S ALL GOOD.

@me: Buncha low life dickheads up in this bitch.

So explain what law makes the NRA responsible for this?

"Suing the NRA" is a tort action under civil law. It's not a criminal matter involving statute law, which typically would require the goobermint to be a party to the suit.

Both kinds of actions still rely on "the law."

Yeah but the NRA isnt responsible for this on any level.

They are a 2A advocacy group who defend the constitutional right to arm ourselves and they promote responsible gun ownership and legal use of deadly force.

I have no idea how anyone could even think about the NRA reading a topic like this.

Fortunately for all of us, a juge will hear both sides of the argument and make a ruling so that we don't have to make careers out of posting our ill-founded opinions here.

This is a message board. This is exactly the place to post and interact with other opinions.

No one thinks it's a place for a "career".

I saw an ill founded opinion that the NRA should be sued for this and I'm challenging it. It was posted on a message board in the politics section where people (fully understanding it's not a career to post opinions) discuss politcal topics.

Just admit it was a stupid hyper partisan comment and that the NRA isnt responsible in anyway for some dumb shit actively breaking the law. Taking a shot at people discussing opinions on a message board while you do the same thing is petty and childish.

If you cant argue for why the NRA should be sued for this just say that.

 

[Dove]

Yeah, transgenderism was definitely a thing in the past and not just a trend which has been introduced over the last 70 years or so.

You don't seem to understand that the only thing different now is that surgeries and hormonal treatments are avaible now. If you could take those things back in a time machine, the takers would be everywhere. Don't deceive yourself so blatantly. It's just sad.

Yeah and its destroying peoples lives.

Something you refuse to see, btw, because gender ideology became a politcal issue.

Stopping puberty and turning children into life long medical patients is disgusting abuse. I hope to see MORE lawsuits like Keira Bells when these kids grow up

 

[Adam Hitler]

Yeah, transgenderism was definitely a thing in the past and not just a trend which has been introduced over the last 70 years or so.

You don't seem to understand that the only thing different now is that surgeries and hormonal treatments are avaible now. If you could take those things back in a time machine, the takers would be everywhere. Don't deceive yourself so blatantly. It's just sad.

I know that the first male to female gender reassignment surgery took place in Weimar Germany and was carried out by a Jewish doctor, until Hitler put a stop to that unnatural practice.

 

[Levon]

Thread Summary:

@LotusBud : This tragedy is not okay with me, and since the law is the only help for the victim's family I hope they use it.

@troglodytes: No, you shouldn't post about it cause you make us uncomfy. Since we can't say that aloud, we'll all just make fun of you and say you're wrong and it's just one of those things, therefore IT'S ALL GOOD.

@me: Buncha low life dickheads up in this bitch.

So explain what law makes the NRA responsible for this?

"Suing the NRA" is a tort action under civil law. It's not a criminal matter involving statute law, which typically would require the goobermint to be a party to the suit.

Both kinds of actions still rely on "the law."

Yeah but the NRA isnt responsible for this on any level.

They are a 2A advocacy group who defend the constitutional right to arm ourselves and they promote responsible gun ownership and legal use of deadly force.

I have no idea how anyone could even think about the NRA reading a topic like this.

Fortunately for all of us, a juge will hear both sides of the argument and make a ruling so that we don't have to make careers out of posting our ill-founded opinions here.

This is a message board. This is exactly the place to post and interact with other opinions.

No one thinks it's a place for a "career".

I saw an ill founded opinion that the NRA should be sued for this and I'm challenging it. It was posted on a message board in the politics section where people (fully understanding it's not a career to post opinions) discuss politcal topics.

Just admit it was a stupid hyper partisan comment and that the NRA isnt responsible in anyway for some dumb shit actively breaking the law. Taking a shot at people discussing opinions on a message board while you do the same thing is petty and childish.

If you cant argue for why the NRA should be sued for this just say that.

Hold yer horses, missy, and don't be ordering me around.

Neither of us can SAY whether the opinion was ill-founded since it's a CIVIL TORT ACTION that's being advocated. It don't mean jack, unless and until SOMEONE files such a suit and the grounds are stated and the INJURY is established and the DAMAGES are named.

You already challenged me once on this EVEN THO I'm not the OP and didn't make the suggestion. And I rejected yer challenge. We're done with this subtopic, you and me. If you don't like my position, well.... as you say, it's a message board.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Thread Summary:

@LotusBud : This tragedy is not okay with me, and since the law is the only help for the victim's family I hope they use it.

@troglodytes: No, you shouldn't post about it cause you make us uncomfy. Since we can't say that aloud, we'll all just make fun of you and say you're wrong and it's just one of those things, therefore IT'S ALL GOOD.

@me: Buncha low life dickheads up in this bitch.

So explain what law makes the NRA responsible for this?

"Suing the NRA" is a tort action under civil law. It's not a criminal matter involving statute law, which typically would require the goobermint to be a party to the suit.

Both kinds of actions still rely on "the law."

Yeah but the NRA isnt responsible for this on any level.

They are a 2A advocacy group who defend the constitutional right to arm ourselves and they promote responsible gun ownership and legal use of deadly force.

I have no idea how anyone could even think about the NRA reading a topic like this.

Fortunately for all of us, a juge will hear both sides of the argument and make a ruling so that we don't have to make careers out of posting our ill-founded opinions here.

This is a message board. This is exactly the place to post and interact with other opinions.

No one thinks it's a place for a "career".

I saw an ill founded opinion that the NRA should be sued for this and I'm challenging it. It was posted on a message board in the politics section where people (fully understanding it's not a career to post opinions) discuss politcal topics.

Just admit it was a stupid hyper partisan comment and that the NRA isnt responsible in anyway for some dumb shit actively breaking the law. Taking a shot at people discussing opinions on a message board while you do the same thing is petty and childish.

If you cant argue for why the NRA should be sued for this just say that.

Hold yer horses, missy, and don't be ordering me around.

Neither of us can SAY whether the opinion was ill-founded since it's a CIVIL TORT ACTION that's being advocated. It don't mean jack, unless and until SOMEONE files such a suit and the grounds are stated and the INJURY is established and the DAMAGES are named.

You already challenged me once on this EVEN THO I'm not the OP and didn't make the suggestion. And I rejected yer challenge. We're done with this subtopic, you and me. If you don't like my position, well.... as you say, it's a message board.

Dry your eye monster.

 

[Murdy]

We can co-exist.

you would think this would be inevitable in the land of teh free….

But you’re talking to people who convolute their political agenda with their religious extremist ideologies.

 

[Dove]

Thread Summary:

@LotusBud : This tragedy is not okay with me, and since the law is the only help for the victim's family I hope they use it.

@troglodytes: No, you shouldn't post about it cause you make us uncomfy. Since we can't say that aloud, we'll all just make fun of you and say you're wrong and it's just one of those things, therefore IT'S ALL GOOD.

@me: Buncha low life dickheads up in this bitch.

So explain what law makes the NRA responsible for this?

"Suing the NRA" is a tort action under civil law. It's not a criminal matter involving statute law, which typically would require the goobermint to be a party to the suit.

Both kinds of actions still rely on "the law."

Yeah but the NRA isnt responsible for this on any level.

They are a 2A advocacy group who defend the constitutional right to arm ourselves and they promote responsible gun ownership and legal use of deadly force.

I have no idea how anyone could even think about the NRA reading a topic like this.

Fortunately for all of us, a juge will hear both sides of the argument and make a ruling so that we don't have to make careers out of posting our ill-founded opinions here.

This is a message board. This is exactly the place to post and interact with other opinions.

No one thinks it's a place for a "career".

I saw an ill founded opinion that the NRA should be sued for this and I'm challenging it. It was posted on a message board in the politics section where people (fully understanding it's not a career to post opinions) discuss politcal topics.

Just admit it was a stupid hyper partisan comment and that the NRA isnt responsible in anyway for some dumb shit actively breaking the law. Taking a shot at people discussing opinions on a message board while you do the same thing is petty and childish.

If you cant argue for why the NRA should be sued for this just say that.

Hold yer horses, missy, and don't be ordering me around.

Neither of us can SAY whether the opinion was ill-founded since it's a CIVIL TORT ACTION that's being advocated. It don't mean jack, unless and until SOMEONE files such a suit and the grounds are stated and the INJURY is established and the DAMAGES are named.

You already challenged me once on this EVEN THO I'm not the OP and didn't make the suggestion. And I rejected yer challenge. We're done with this subtopic, you and me. If you don't like my position, well.... as you say, it's a message board.

What position?

All you've done is try gish gallop and mouth off because Lotus said something fucking stupid and someone pointed it out.

No one can sue the NRA, even on this TORT level. I invited someone to explain how this would even be possible. Clicking your heels and repeating "tort action" doesnt answer anything.

Even with the approval of a dizt who doesnt even understand what tort action IS but tells forum people she practices law.

Dont get shitty with people because they notice pure partisan bullshit when they see it.

Maybe we can use TORT ACTION to sue the AMA everytime a post abortive woman gets an infection.

Be done if you are done. I'm not compelling you to do anything.

 

[The Prowler]

many people exist somewhere else on the spectrum

There is no spectrum.

A cat is a cat.

A dog is a dog.

There is no such thing as x% cat and y% dog where (x=100 and y=0) or (x=0 and y=100) is not true.

Same with sex.

 

[The Prowler]

I have a very simple metaphor for this that I try with thick-headed people. I am left-handed. Yes, by far most people are right-handed. But being left-handed is still perfectly normal and left-handed people are still capable of making contributions to society, and giving and getting love, and are nothing to be frightened of. We're just like righties in most ways. And we won't try to force you to be left-handed, even though everyone once tried to force us to be right-handed. So calm down and stop worrying about us. We can co-exist.

Let-handed people should be shot dead.

 

[The Prowler]

Blurt?

LotusBud?

Why are you so resistant to explain it?

Can anyone explain how it "feels" to be a woman? And how that differs from how it "feels" to be a man?

Still have not had one person even attempt to explain this.

This is what happens when you have a bunch of people like LettuceBrain and The Leaker who sit around nodding their heads at ideas, pretending to understand, when they are actually clueless.

They cannot think. They cannot reason.

They are fed "information" and they have absolutely no ability to rationalize and determine if it is bullshit.

 

[Lily]

Thread Summary:

@LotusBud : This tragedy is not okay with me, and since the law is the only help for the victim's family I hope they use it.

@troglodytes: No, you shouldn't post about it cause you make us uncomfy. Since we can't say that aloud, we'll all just make fun of you and say you're wrong and it's just one of those things, therefore IT'S ALL GOOD.

@me: Buncha low life dickheads up in this bitch.

So explain what law makes the NRA responsible for this?

"Suing the NRA" is a tort action under civil law. It's not a criminal matter involving statute law, which typically would require the goobermint to be a party to the suit.

Both kinds of actions still rely on "the law."

Yeah but the NRA isnt responsible for this on any level.

They are a 2A advocacy group who defend the constitutional right to arm ourselves and they promote responsible gun ownership and legal use of deadly force.

I have no idea how anyone could even think about the NRA reading a topic like this.

Fortunately for all of us, a juge will hear both sides of the argument and make a ruling so that we don't have to make careers out of posting our ill-founded opinions here.

This is a message board. This is exactly the place to post and interact with other opinions.

No one thinks it's a place for a "career".

I saw an ill founded opinion that the NRA should be sued for this and I'm challenging it. It was posted on a message board in the politics section where people (fully understanding it's not a career to post opinions) discuss politcal topics.

Just admit it was a stupid hyper partisan comment and that the NRA isnt responsible in anyway for some dumb shit actively breaking the law. Taking a shot at people discussing opinions on a message board while you do the same thing is petty and childish.

If you cant argue for why the NRA should be sued for this just say that.

Hold yer horses, missy, and don't be ordering me around.

Neither of us can SAY whether the opinion was ill-founded since it's a CIVIL TORT ACTION that's being advocated. It don't mean jack, unless and until SOMEONE files such a suit and the grounds are stated and the INJURY is established and the DAMAGES are named.

You already challenged me once on this EVEN THO I'm not the OP and didn't make the suggestion. And I rejected yer challenge. We're done with this subtopic, you and me. If you don't like my position, well.... as you say, it's a message board.

What position?

All you've done is try gish gallop and mouth off because Lotus said something fucking stupid and someone pointed it out.

No one can sue the NRA, even on this TORT level. I invited someone to explain how this would even be possible. Clicking your heels and repeating "tort action" doesnt answer anything.

Even with the approval of a dizt who doesnt even understand what tort action IS but tells forum people she practices law.

Dont get shitty with people because they notice pure partisan bullshit when they see it.

Maybe we can use TORT ACTION to sue the AMA everytime a post abortive woman gets an infection.

Be done if you are done. I'm not compelling you to do anything.

Anyone can sue for anything in these United States of Litigation...ask any lawyer.

 

[Adam Hitler]

It's all about fweelings and virtue signalling with these liberal bleeding heart types, facts and truth are of only secondary concern...

 

[Adam Hitler]

Blurt?

LotusBud?

Why are you so resistant to explain it?

Can anyone explain how it "feels" to be a woman? And how that differs from how it "feels" to be a man?

Still have not had one person even attempt to explain this.

This is what happens when you have a bunch of people like LettuceBrain and The Leaker who sit around nodding their heads at ideas, pretending to understand, when they are actually clueless.

They cannot think. They cannot reason.

They are fed "information" and they have absolutely no ability to rationalize and determine if it is bullshit.

I can give you some insight into the inner workings of Blurtrude's fried braincells....

He loves women, I mean absolutely adores them. However his fondness is not expressed in a healthy, heterosexual way. Instead it's displayed in a weird, creepy, Norman Bates-esque manner, where he has fetishized them so much, that he enjoys to dress in women's clothes and pretend to be one. He also constantly puts men down and denounces "toxic masculinity", while championing the Feminist cause, like a 65 year old Jewish spinster.

In all honesty, it wouldn't surprise me if the guy is a virgin, claiming that he respects women too much to sully their honour with his disgusting manhood. Lulz

 

[Biggie Smiles]

We can co-exist.

you would think this would be inevitable in the land of teh free….

But you’re talking to people who convolute their political agenda with their religious extremist ideologies.

I don't think it has as much to do with religious ideologies as it does with the fact that these deviant fuckheads simply cannot stay in their own lane. They've been known to demand the usage of restroom & other faculties of the opposite biological gender, conscript the labor of people who object religiously to their life choices, invade on sports of their biological opposites with clear advantages in size & strength and indoctrinate our most vulnerable with their deviant filth.

So no, it's not that we as conservatives are convoluting anything; it's simply the fact that you give this type of animal filth a foot and they start demanding a yard. To say otherwise is simply disingenuous

 

[Levon]

We can co-exist.

you would think this would be inevitable in the land of teh free….

But you’re talking to people who convolute their political agenda with their religious extremist ideologies.

I don't think it has as much to do with religious ideologies as it does with the fact that these deviant fuckheads simply cannot stay in their own lane. They've been known to demand the usage of restroom & other faculties of the opposite biological gender, conscript the labor of people who object religiously to their life choices, invade on sports of their biological opposites with clear advantages in size & strength and indoctrinate our most vulnerable with their deviant filth.

So no, it's not that we as conservatives are convoluting anything; it's simply the fact that you give this type of animal filth a foot and they start demanding a yard. To say otherwise is simply disingenuous

Thanks for proving Murd's point, like the good little yappy Chihuahua you are.