- Messages
- 3,772
- Location
- The Road to Shambhala
Cannon - Crosshairs
- Thread starter The New Holliday
- Start date
- Messages
- 43,543
- Location
- They're just weird as hell.
How come my criminal trials aren’t in front judges beholden to me? Very unfair and witchy hunty!
OP
OP
- Messages
- 3,772
- Location
- The Road to Shambhala
FAKE TRIAL !....Toadally RIGGED.
- Messages
- 50,772
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
I just can't. I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone.
- Messages
- 43,543
- Location
- They're just weird as hell.
Oddsmakers say the 11th Circuit will reverse this tout de suite
OP
OP
- Messages
- 3,772
- Location
- The Road to Shambhala
I hope nothing bad happens to judge Cannon on account of her being a commie traitor to the United States..
- Messages
- 43,543
- Location
- They're just weird as hell.
Oh great another shitty d00l.
OP
OP
- Messages
- 3,772
- Location
- The Road to Shambhala
^^^^Oh look, theBadTardFagtory has produced a new model....just like the old model^^^^
- Messages
- 43,543
- Location
- They're just weird as hell.
How she is still on this Case, let alone on the Bench is beyond me.
- Messages
- 50,772
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
OP
OP
- Messages
- 3,772
- Location
- The Road to Shambhala
Pussies. Nothing more tardish or cowardly than a dual.
- Messages
- 50,772
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
Corruption. It's legal and made America great again. You hadn't noticed?
I don't blame anyone for cut to their core by this ruling. She has betrayed country, conscience and common sense with this reckless ruling.
Biden needs to do the right thing and set up crisis centers where the afflicted can receive the proper treatment, tissues and trauma kits.
Biden needs to do the right thing and set up crisis centers where the afflicted can receive the proper treatment, tissues and trauma kits.
OP
OP
- Messages
- 3,772
- Location
- The Road to Shambhala
- Messages
- 50,772
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
Their fragility suggests scrotum.
A pussy can take a pounding.
Now, the lawlessness of this judge's decision might scare the centrists in this country.
It may make them act like a check on the populist insanity on the right.
Are you providing us a glimmer of hope by suggesting that some who may have otherwise voted for Trump will now refrain from doing so based on this judge's ruling that is favorable to Trump? This is an avenue of assurance I am hoping we can expand upon in greater detail?
All these throwaway alts/duals/whatever ruin forums and should be deleted. Sheriff needs to wrangle up the hundreds of alt accounts on this forum and shoot them.
- Messages
- 50,772
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
DKG, with his subservience to Gojira, cannot deliver a product people actually want. His members post here.
Embarrassing.
- Messages
- 43,543
- Location
- They're just weird as hell.
If they had a moral compass, they wouldn’t be outcasts from paradise.
- Messages
- 50,772
- Location
- De donde me da la gana.
They are cucks. They hate the world because they are the losers in the game.
OP
OP
- Messages
- 3,772
- Location
- The Road to Shambhala
All of us, until duals from BC and elsewhere start visiting. Then the percentage drops quickly.
If DKG really wanted to have a reasonable conversation about politics he would not own a troll board run by Bigly...that place is a daily Trump bukkake party, faces glazed like crispy cream donuts due to friendly fire Maga ejaculations.
Would it not make sense for us to read Judge Cannon's decision for ourselves so that we assure ourselves we have the thoughts straight out of the horses mouth absent of any biased narratives which may be circulating on both sides of the aisle?
This ruling is publicly available.
This ruling is publicly available.
OP
OP
- Messages
- 3,772
- Location
- The Road to Shambhala
She said it's unconsatooshinle to indict Trump on any charge. Why? ...because you just can't do that.
.You knew it was coming.
How long has she had to review the facts and the day after a FAKE assassination attempt...suddenly
. The charges are unconsatooshinle because they suggest that Trump may have done something wrong.
Which, of course he never does.
That's unconscionable! Can you cite the page and paragraph in her ruling which states this? I would like to share this with some Trumplicans I know of who are saying her ruling is rooted in the tenets of the constitution. With your help I can show them just how mislead they truly are.
OP
OP
- Messages
- 3,772
- Location
- The Road to Shambhala
- Messages
- 43,543
- Location
- They're just weird as hell.
Can't you read, you poor thing?
It is so unfortunate that neither of you can quote a reference within the ruling to substantiate your position. I was really becoming excited at the prospect of possibly countering these trumpards with some good ole fashioned facts.
These Trumplicans are like a dog with a bone you know. They seem committed to burdening me with all kinds of inconvenient details such as the appointments clause and the fact that the Attorney general lacks the authority to appoint a special counsel to a matter such as this. They’ve even gone down some disturbing rabbit holes, espousing harebrained and troubling theory that Robert Muller himself had to be appointed by congress due to this pesky little detail more broadly known as the separation of powers.
Sigh, they seem to have read the ruling and the legal principles referenced within. Not only read it, but seem to understand the spirit and context! Tedious but determined little motherfuckers these trumplicans are, aren't they? That said, would it be too much to ask for you assist with any additional information that is rooted in facts and common sense which upends their assertions? I would appreciate it greatly as I would hate for some cousin fuckers in jackboots to gain the high ground above us here.
These Trumplicans are like a dog with a bone you know. They seem committed to burdening me with all kinds of inconvenient details such as the appointments clause and the fact that the Attorney general lacks the authority to appoint a special counsel to a matter such as this. They’ve even gone down some disturbing rabbit holes, espousing harebrained and troubling theory that Robert Muller himself had to be appointed by congress due to this pesky little detail more broadly known as the separation of powers.
Sigh, they seem to have read the ruling and the legal principles referenced within. Not only read it, but seem to understand the spirit and context! Tedious but determined little motherfuckers these trumplicans are, aren't they? That said, would it be too much to ask for you assist with any additional information that is rooted in facts and common sense which upends their assertions? I would appreciate it greatly as I would hate for some cousin fuckers in jackboots to gain the high ground above us here.
