It is so unfortunate that neither of you can quote a reference within the ruling to substantiate your position. I was really becoming excited at the prospect of possibly countering these trumpards with some good ole fashioned facts.
These Trumplicans are like a dog with a bone you know. They seem committed to burdening me with all kinds of inconvenient details such as the appointments clause and the fact that the Attorney general lacks the authority to appoint a special counsel to a matter such as this. They’ve even gone down some disturbing rabbit holes, espousing harebrained and troubling theory that Robert Muller himself had to be appointed by congress due to this pesky little detail more broadly known as the separation of powers.
Sigh, they seem to have read the ruling and the legal principles referenced within. Not only read it, but seem to understand the spirit and context! Tedious but determined little motherfuckers these trumplicans are, aren't they? That said, would it be too much to ask for you assist with any additional information that is rooted in facts and common sense which upends their assertions? I would appreciate it greatly as I would hate for some cousin fuckers in jackboots to gain the high ground above us here.