Climate Change and Nepal
- Thread starter LotusBud
- Start date
You obviously aren't a student of what it was like 10,500 plus years ago for humankind.... I suggest you keep your gob shut.
- Reaction score
- 864
- Location
- Shangri La
Mercy Corps is a good organization to donate through if you wish to do so.
Dodgy org....
- Reaction score
- 864
- Location
- Shangri La
Not at all, very transparent. Highest percent of donations received by targeted recipients.
Mercy Corps is a highly rated, reputable global humanitarian organization that major charity watchdogs recognize for strong financial accountability and efficiency. [, ]
Financial Efficiency & Ratings
- Program Spending: Mercy Corps allocates roughly 82% to 86% of its expenses directly to programmatic relief and long-term development services. [, , ]
- Watchdog Scores: It earns high marks from evaluators like and for financial transparency, governance, and low administrative overhead. [, , ]
- Public Consensus: Users on platforms like generally agree that the organization is a leading non-governmental entity for international crisis and development work. []
- Reaction score
- 1,536
Something a loser like you could use
- Reaction score
- 2,269
- Location
- Chicagoland
Wow! I'm sorry. I didn't realize you were a hydrocephalic retard.
- Reaction score
- 1,141
- Location
- Alaska
I'm smart enough to know we were not doing the industrial shit we do now, dumb fuck. So comparing the impact then and now is something idiots like you and Reginald_Incestual do. Intelligent people understand the difference.
- Reaction score
- 2,269
- Location
- Chicagoland
I'm gonna start calling you Marty the Waterhead. When I was a kid there was a waterhead retard named Marty that lived in my grandma's town. He wandered around the town making a nuisance of himself and we kids were instructed to never let him into the house.
Anyway, Marty, here's a simple question for you: 15,000 years ago where I'm sitting right now was the southern edge of a massive glacier that stretched from here all the way into Canaduh. I live in a place called "Boulder Hill." It's a glacial moraine - a heap of dirt and rocks that the glacier pushed along in front of it.
But the glacier melted, Marty, and there was no "industrial pollution" 15,000 years ago. How did that happen, Marty?
Wow. You really are stupid, aren't you?
He really is.
- Reaction score
- 1,141
- Location
- Alaska
Yes, yes, brain damage. Those cooling and heating cycles occur. What intelligent people understand is that when human industrial pollution is added onto those natural cycles, they will not function the same way. There's actually science behind it although I know your brick head will fail to grasp what I'm saying.
- Reaction score
- 2,269
- Location
- Chicagoland
How did the glacier melt 15,000 years ago, Lotus, when there was no "anthropogenic" industrial influences on the climate?
It's a simple question, dear.
Really!? Oh wow! So cooling and heating cycles have always occurred, but it's all worse now because of humans, even though there's no baseline or control to prove this theory and we're all gonna die because Trump and other rich people. I see.
Do you masturbate to pictures of Greta Thunberg?
- Reaction score
- 1,141
- Location
- Alaska
Yeah, brain damage, our emissions are just fictional pixie dust made up by gay liberals lol
And the learndededed super duper smart people that know how that pixie dust works are just on Obama's payroll to piss you off.
- Reaction score
- 2,269
- Location
- Chicagoland
OK, Marty.
I don't know why you even bother with these progtarded zombies....
Trying to explain the rapid onslaught of retreating glaciers and unimaginable flooding that occurred to these morons is like attempting to teach a jackarse how to play Badminton....
I'm guessing Marty was considerably smarter than you are.OK, Marty.
- Reaction score
- 864
- Location
- Shangri La
...and you are a glacial morone.
- Reaction score
- 2,269
- Location
- Chicagoland
Actually, Marty was a sweet kid. Wasn't his fault he was a retard. Kinda like Reptile Raper.
You can give it a shot, Hollidunce. How did the glacier that was once right here where I'm sitting just 15,000 years ago - a literal eye blink in geological time - melt when there was no "anthropogenic" warming?
- Reaction score
- 864
- Location
- Shangri La
Eccentricity, obliquity, precession. You could look them up.
. Milankovitch cycles - which are not operating to continue that warming which lead to the end of the last ice age.
I know how you distrust the AI, so here you can distrust NASA:
Earth is currently in an interglacial period (a period of milder climate between Ice Ages). If there were no human influences on climate, scientists say Earth’s current orbital positions within the Milankovitch cycles predict our planet should be cooling, not warming, continuing a long-term cooling trend that began 6,000 years ago.
. Milankovitch cycles - which are not operating to continue that warming which lead to the end of the last ice age.
I know how you distrust the AI, so here you can distrust NASA:
Earth is currently in an interglacial period (a period of milder climate between Ice Ages). If there were no human influences on climate, scientists say Earth’s current orbital positions within the Milankovitch cycles predict our planet should be cooling, not warming, continuing a long-term cooling trend that began 6,000 years ago.
- Reaction score
- 2,269
- Location
- Chicagoland
So you got nothing but your AI crutch. I see.
So, do you masturbate to images of Greta Thunberg like Marty Reptile Reaper does?
- Reaction score
- 864
- Location
- Shangri La
Care to refutiate what NASA has to say about things, Reggie?
I mean, maybe Alex Jones knows better and being your better, you can parrotphrase what he says on the subject.
"refutiate" as you know, Reggie, is a Sarah Palinism.
Oh many pardons...it's "refudiate".
Last edited:
Does that mean something?
- Reaction score
- 2,269
- Location
- Chicagoland
I don't need to refute the science of Geology which posits that the climate of the earth has been in a constant state of flux and change for billions of years. What has not been definitively proven is the theory of "anthropogenic global climate change." There's simply not enough data to prove the theorem.
AND, since Leftist Vermin Scum have been proven to have manipulated climate data to suit Left Wing Ideological agendas, I'm inclined to point and laugh at lemming drone dumbfucks who stool push the Leftist Green agenda.
- Reaction score
- 864
- Location
- Shangri La
LoLz.
/ Right, Reggie. Please learn to read. The predictable shift in the absence of human activity would be to a cooling climate.
I find it interesting that you believe the science in one moment but not the other when it's the same science speaking.
"refudiate" - I'm not well versed in contard moron speak, but give me credit for trying to speak your language.
/ Right, Reggie. Please learn to read. The predictable shift in the absence of human activity would be to a cooling climate.
I find it interesting that you believe the science in one moment but not the other when it's the same science speaking.
"refudiate" - I'm not well versed in contard moron speak, but give me credit for trying to speak your language.
- Reaction score
- 2,269
- Location
- Chicagoland
No. We're right where we should be for this interglacial period.
No one can prove that statement incorrect.
You clearly do not understand Science.
No, it's not the "same science." Michael Mann and his Leftist cohorts were not doing "science," they were and still are doing "ideology." When every single proposed solution to "combat" anthropogenic climate change involve the expansion of government power and authority and the diminution of human liberty, you can kinda tell it's about politics and not Science.
Similar threads
