You already know who you can trust your car with; yourself. (I'm giving you a lot of credit on that point, but it's your car, so trust it with whomever you choose.)Hardly. I need to know who I can trust my car with.
You already know who you can trust your car with; yourself. (I'm giving you a lot of credit on that point, but it's your car, so trust it with whomever you choose.)Hardly. I need to know who I can trust my car with.
I've always heard I can trust my car to the man who wears the star, so I'm figuring you're a good bet.You already know who you can trust your car with; yourself. (I'm giving you a lot of credit on that point, but it's your car, so trust it with whomever you choose.)
Yoo obviously cant thinkWhy, you plan to send it back for a refund?
Everything has always existed, just not in its present forms.
And how do yoo know?No one goes to heaven. No one goes to hell. Because both are imaginary.
Again with the irony around here. And I say that not because I believe your ridiculous persona, but because you think anybody does believe your ridiculous persona.Yoo obviously cant think![]()
I'm not Texaco, genius.I've always heard I can trust my car to the man who wears the star, so I'm figuring you're a good bet.
Because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence -- and there is none.And how do yoo know?
Really though, I am not so shocked to find you aren't trustworthy.I'm not Texaco, genius.
Have you been to China, Borneo, The Gobi Desert (maybe you have being a "Desert Ranger" and all)?Because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence -- and there is none.
Are you going all "flat-Earther" now? Because that'd be a true comedy-bonus.Have you been to China, Borneo, The Gobi Desert (maybe you have being a "Desert Ranger" and all)?
In the end, all you really have is other people's word for it and some flimsy evidence easy to fake.
Not at all - I'd think that was your domain as a contard.Are you going all "flat-Earther" now? Because that'd be a true comedy-bonus.
And yet, you called into doubt the existence of places like, "...China, Borneo, The Gobi Desert..."Not at all - I'd think that was your domain as a contard.
Nah, they are on the other side of the globe.And yet, you called into doubt the existence of places like, "...China, Borneo, The Gobi Desert..."
Sounds pretty "flat-Earther" to me.
Nah, they are on the other side of the globe.
Now yer comments...they sound pretty "Flat-Liner" to me.
So it's true, all you are capable of is quoting other people, and inappropriately too.
Reverse image search that. You won't find it. Because I didn't quote it from anywhere.So it's true, all you are capable of is quoting other people,
So you and your special ed teacher made it?Reverse image search that. You won't find it. Because I didn't quote it from anywhere.
You have an uncanny knack for being wrong. If being wrong was an Olympic event, you'd take the Gol... well, no, you'd take the zinc and think yourself a champion.So you and your special ed teacher made it?
... or you copied it (cut and pasted), not quoted.
You have a knack for unfounded claims. You really do think that saying something makes it so in the total absence of evidence, and yet you scoff at those who hold belief in the existence of "other worlds" simple because YOU don't see them. Seems a bit self centered and short sighted. A bit concrete, blockheaded....mundane, unadventuresome....aka conservative.You have an uncanny knack for being wrong. If being wrong was an Olympic event, you'd take the Gol... well, no, you'd take the zinc and think yourself a champion.
Defend religiosity to somebody else. I'm perfectly content to have pointed out that failing in you, and have no interest in pursuing this until you inevitably start quoting scripture at me in its defense.You have a knack for unfounded claims. You really do think that saying something makes it so in the total absence of evidence, and yet you scoff at those who hold belief in the existence of "other worlds" simple because YOU don't see them. Seems a bit self centered and short sighted. A bit concrete, blockheaded....mundane, unadventuresome....aka conservative.
See, how limited you are? I wasn't defending religiosity.Defend religiosity to somebody else. I'm perfectly content to have pointed out that failing in you, and have no interest in pursuing this until you inevitably start quoting scripture at me in its defense.
Think much??? I think notAgain with the irony around here. And I say that not because I believe your ridiculous persona, but because you think anybody does believe your ridiculous persona.