Menu
Home
Forum Rules
Store
Donate
Meltdown Mayhem Hacks ⚔︎
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Political Fray
Daily reminder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dove" data-source="post: 547011" data-attributes="member: 535"><p>"</p><p>The current version of SB 273 would continue to allow a child of <em>any age</em> to marry, and would erect meaningless barriers that are insufficient to protect children from forced marriage or from the harms of early marriage.</p><p></p><p>In addition, the current version of SB 273 would continue to undermine statutory-rape laws and give rapists a “get out of jail free” card. The age of consent to have sex in California is 18, and someone who has sex with a child under 18 can be charged with a felony or misdemeanor, depending on the parties’ age difference. However, those protections disappear as soon as a marriage license is issued, because the <a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN&sectionNum=261.5." target="_blank">statutory-rape law exempts married couples</a>.</p><p></p><p>A full rebuttal of the current version of SB 273 is <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/vf1s0dic0uz5hg1/2018-08%20SB%20273%20Opposition%20Letter.pdf?dl=0" target="_blank">here</a>, in the form of the opposition letter we submitted to the California legislature on August 9.</p><p></p><p>Earlier this year, we got Delaware and New Jersey to end all child marriage – the first two U.S. states to do so. Other states are moving to do the same. Why is California lagging behind?" </p><p></p><p> <a href="https://www.unchainedatlast.org/8-20-2018-why-wont-california-end-child-marriage/" target="_blank">https://www.unchainedatlast.org/8-20-2018-why-wont-california-end-child-marriage/</a></p><p></p><p> Its lagging behind because the leftwing corporate media isnt throwing a fit and CA is a dem/prog state so dealing with this isnt a priority at all. Tribal politics have convinced blue state voters that Republicans are (falsely btw) trying to do everything democrats ALREADY fucking do. </p><p></p><p> And they thinks it's funny and dont care when it's their own "side". We would all be stuck suffering through various human rights violations and tyranny to the max if the dems/progs take over the country.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dove, post: 547011, member: 535"] " The current version of SB 273 would continue to allow a child of [I]any age[/I] to marry, and would erect meaningless barriers that are insufficient to protect children from forced marriage or from the harms of early marriage. In addition, the current version of SB 273 would continue to undermine statutory-rape laws and give rapists a “get out of jail free” card. The age of consent to have sex in California is 18, and someone who has sex with a child under 18 can be charged with a felony or misdemeanor, depending on the parties’ age difference. However, those protections disappear as soon as a marriage license is issued, because the [URL='https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN§ionNum=261.5.']statutory-rape law exempts married couples[/URL]. A full rebuttal of the current version of SB 273 is [URL='https://www.dropbox.com/s/vf1s0dic0uz5hg1/2018-08%20SB%20273%20Opposition%20Letter.pdf?dl=0']here[/URL], in the form of the opposition letter we submitted to the California legislature on August 9. Earlier this year, we got Delaware and New Jersey to end all child marriage – the first two U.S. states to do so. Other states are moving to do the same. Why is California lagging behind?" [URL]https://www.unchainedatlast.org/8-20-2018-why-wont-california-end-child-marriage/[/URL] Its lagging behind because the leftwing corporate media isnt throwing a fit and CA is a dem/prog state so dealing with this isnt a priority at all. Tribal politics have convinced blue state voters that Republicans are (falsely btw) trying to do everything democrats ALREADY fucking do. And they thinks it's funny and dont care when it's their own "side". We would all be stuck suffering through various human rights violations and tyranny to the max if the dems/progs take over the country. [/QUOTE]
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Sweatshop - Pure Drama
Political Fray
Daily reminder
