- Reaction score
- 19,607
This guy's a wild card, lots of shit he says has merit .Then he starts with reptilian overlords and that whole frog thing, I tried but couldn't invest much time to his theories .I have infowars in my streams but it's always his pee- ons and they try to sell his coffee..
I'm getting he's protagonist to his cause but does he have to be such a sensationalizing stooge about it..
Guys made for the stage
He's a bomb throwing rodeo clown.He admitted in the lawsuit filed against him that it's a show. He puts on a show, doesn't know shit, makes up shit...why anyone would listen to this blowhard is beyond me.
He's a bomb throwing rodeo clown.
He admitted in the lawsuit filed against him that it's a show. He puts on a show, doesn't know shit, makes up shit...why anyone would listen to this blowhard is beyond me.
To be fair he's not alone.
Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow both made similar court arguments that they are "entertainment" and "opinion" rather than strictly peddlers of empirical facts. Someone ought to tell their audiences though... it seems those audiences still consider Tucker, Rachel, and Alex trusted sources of (dis)information.
lulz
Rachel is not even in the same Zip Code as the RW shouters.To be fair he's not alone.
Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow both made similar court arguments that they are "entertainment" and "opinion" rather than strictly peddlers of empirical facts. Someone ought to tell their audiences though... it seems those audiences still consider Tucker, Rachel, and Alex trusted sources of (dis)information.
lulz
Rachel is not even in the same Zip Code as the RW shouters.
She is not anywhere even in the same ballpark as "those people" she is highly educated, studied at Oxford, and owns a Phd in Politics.She's not a leftist and has pretty much said as much about herself. Though, I don't watch her enough to know if she's as egregious as Alex "kids shot in face were 'crisis actors'" Jones
She is not anywhere even in the same ballpark as "those people" she is highly educated, studied at Oxford, and owns a Phd in Politics.
Propaganda must always have some kernels of truth to make it related to the target audience. ie there is no massive election fraud, but paint a picture of mystery ballot deliveries and all that horse shit and people start questioning elections....which opens the door to the extreme right to work on election access minimization tactics.The issue then to me is people like Alex Jones who feed off some legitimate theories but ends up distorting its perception, then its those grains of truth that are still relevant sure it may appear to many to be gaslit but all isn't clear nothing bad is easy so if we apply the fact lies will be made to elude us where are they as 8/10 the powers that be are misguiding the masses to appear transparent and of good merit
Possibly I seriously think anyone that listens to Rachel explain something, and then listen to Tucker, or Hannity or Laura et al.for a couple minutes should be able to see the difference between a critical analysis of a topic, and the monkeys throwing poop.Yeah, I think she herself said she is an "Eisenhower liberal". Back before the GOP moved to the batshit crazy asylum.
Possibly I seriously think any that listens to Rachel explain something, and then listen to Tucker, or Hannity or Laura et al.for a couple minutes should be able to see the difference between a critical analysis of a topic, and the monkeys throwing poop.
"Now that Biden has closed the border like some foreign dictator, aren't closed borders just creeping socialistic trade unionism?" Tucker Hannity. /satirePossibly I seriously think anyone that listens to Rachel explain something, and then listen to Tucker, or Hannity or Laura et al.for a couple minutes should be able to see the difference between a critical analysis of a topic, and the monkeys throwing poop.