Did Lauren Boebert work as a paid escort for Senator Ted Cruz?

[Blurt]

So, @MrNiceGuy and I have a different opinion. Not a big deal. He's free to say whatever he wants.

I'm a little puzzled over his obsession with pronouns, though, and his appeal to the First Amendment (which enshrines the principle that the government--the GOVERNMENT--shall not prevent citizens from expressing themselves freely).

When a political figure popular with an extremist segment of the population expresses to a crowd of supporters that they should march to the seat of government and "fight like hell or [they] won't have a country anymore," his words are deeds, indeed, especially after those very same folks ransack the Capitol on his orders.

But, sure, we can talk about pronouns if you want.

 

[MrNiceGuy]

So, @MrNiceGuy and I have a different opinion. Not a big deal. He's free to say whatever he wants.

I'm a little puzzled over his obsession with pronouns, though, and his appeal to the First Amendment (which enshrines the principle that the government--the GOVERNMENT--shall not prevent citizens from expressing themselves freely).

When a political figure popular with an extremist segment of the population expresses to a crowd of supporters that they should march to the seat of government and "fight like hell or [they] won't have a country anymore," his words are deeds, indeed, especially after those very same folks ransack the Capitol on his orders.

But, sure, we can talk about pronouns if you want.

Political figures popular with extremist segments like progressives support Palestinians over Jews even though Native Americans were first & Jews were first?

Woops. Looks like Palestinians came later. Like those darned imperialistic manifest destiny colonialists.

"I'm a little puzzled over his obsession with pronouns, though, and his appeal to the First Amendment (which enshrines the principle that the government--the GOVERNMENT--shall not prevent citizens from expressing themselves freely)." - Blurt

My obsession is with protecting freedom of expression. I think abstract art sucks and pablo picasso could paint real things so why did he abandon painting real things for abstract bullshit? Because be rebelled against it. Nevertheless I defend his right to abstract bullshit. You have the right to rebel against an opinion. But not the right to claim said opinion is violence. That is folly.

To make an argument that allows any human mind cannot differentiate opinion from fact from deeds is tantamount to diminishing our worth as sapiens.

I defend the right to an opinion of whatever pronoun you desire while defending the rights of those not giving fucks to whatever pronoun you desire and denying in any way shape or form it is violence against ye by their expressions carrying as much weight as yours in a grand scheme of sentience.

We ALL feel. Your "woke" feels carry no more water nor weight than anyone else, born. Period.

As you say, the government - the GOVERNMENT, shall not prevent citizens from expressing themselves freely...

I will go beyond to say the government governs by consent of the governed. The will of the people. Will is as much if not moreso an individual liberty than anything else.

Your will and my will differ. Your will is to deflect my will into pronoun obsession while my will is to vastly appreciate your will and ingrain it into both of our futures together and beyond.

You are looking to winning an argument.

I am looking to appreciate that our differences are our strength.

If diversity is strength, then diverse opinions are the strength of humanity, codified by DIFFERENCES... not by similarities.

How say you?

 

[Admin.]

Political figures popular with extremist segments like progressives support Palestinians over Jews even though Native Americans were first & Jews were first?

Woops. Looks like Palestinians came later. Like those darned imperialistic manifest destiny colonialists.

"I'm a little puzzled over his obsession with pronouns, though, and his appeal to the First Amendment (which enshrines the principle that the government--the GOVERNMENT--shall not prevent citizens from expressing themselves freely)." - Blurt

My obsession is with protecting freedom of expression. I think abstract art sucks and pablo picasso could paint real things so why did he abandon painting real things for abstract bullshit? Because be rebelled against it. Nevertheless I defend his right to abstract bullshit. You have the right to rebel against an opinion. But not the right to claim said opinion is violence. That is folly.

To make an argument that allows any human mind cannot differentiate opinion from fact from deeds is tantamount to diminishing our worth as sapiens.

I defend the right to an opinion of whatever pronoun you desire while defending the rights of those not giving fucks to whatever pronoun you desire and denying in any way shape or form it is violence against ye by their expressions carrying as much weight as yours in a grand scheme of sentience.

We ALL feel. Your "woke" feels carry no more water nor weight than anyone else, born. Period.

As you say, the government - the GOVERNMENT, shall not prevent citizens from expressing themselves freely...

I will go beyond to say the government governs by consent of the governed. The will of the people. Will is as much if not moreso an individual liberty than anything else.

Your will and my will differ. Your will is to deflect my will into pronoun obsession while my will is to vastly appreciate your will and ingrain it into both of our futures together and beyond.

You are looking to winning an argument.

I am looking to appreciate that our differences are our strength.

If diversity is strength, then diverse opinions are the strength of humanity, codified by DIFFERENCES... not by similarities.

How say you?

TLDR

 

[Lily]

^^King of the non-sequitur
@MrNiceGuy

 

[MrNiceGuy]

Bots gonna bot.

 

[Admin.]

Bots gonna bot.

Yes we noticed, hence the commentary.

 

[MrNiceGuy]

People who don't say much aren't worth much.

Engage or disengage.

Enrage or disenrage.

Against the dying of the light, your worth is your might.
In a battle of words your silence is turds,
The world needs to be rapt,
But you choose a nap...


Be a cog with biting teeth or an aimless wheel spinning without bite.

Show me yours as I show you mine.

Hell hath no fury as those with a spine...


Your TLDR is a bridge too far,
A summation of subjugation by process of your own elimination,
You forgo your own statement in lieu of your own derangement.

 

[LotusBud]

People who don't say much aren't worth much.

Engage or disengage.

Enrage or disenrage.

Against the dying of the light, your worth is your might.
In a battle of words your silence is turds,
The world needs to be rapt,
But you choose a nap...


Be a cog with biting teeth or an aimless wheel spinning without bite.

Show me yours as I show you mine.

Hell hath no fury as those with a spine...


Your TLDR is a bridge too far,
A summation of subjugation by process of your own elimination,
You forgo your own statement in lieu of your own derangement.

IMO, people who say too much aren't worth much. I love the non-verbal-communication-is-worth-a-thousand-words type.

 

[Admin.]

People who don't say much aren't worth much.

Engage or disengage.

Enrage or disenrage.

Against the dying of the light, your worth is your might.
In a battle of words your silence is turds,
The world needs to be rapt,
But you choose a nap...


Be a cog with biting teeth or an aimless wheel spinning without bite.

Show me yours as I show you mine.

Hell hath no fury as those with a spine...


Your TLDR is a bridge too far,
A summation of subjugation by process of your own elimination,
You forgo your own statement in lieu of your own derangement.

Oh, so you get paid by the word, I gotcha well you just type away to your little heart's content!

@MrNiceGuy Show me werdz!

 

[Blurt]

You are looking to winning an argument.

I am looking to appreciate that our differences are our strength.

I'm "looking to winning an argument"? Mmm'kay.

Except, what I actually said is, "so, @MrNiceGuy and I have a different opinion. Not a big deal. He's free to say whatever he wants."

If you put half as much effort into listening to what others are saying as you do into swooning over the sound of your own words. maybe your "How say you?" wouldn't sound like the rhetorical question it actually is.

 

[MrNiceGuy]

I'm "looking to winning an argument"? Mmm'kay.

Except, what I actually said is, "so, @MrNiceGuy and I have a different opinion. Not a big deal. He's free to say whatever he wants."

If you put half as much effort into listening to what others are saying as you do into swooning over the sound of your own words. maybe your "How say you?" wouldn't sound like the rhetorical question it actually is.

Oh, I listened.

So anytime anyone does something bad, but in your name, you are to blame rather than them because your words are deeds and they did bad shit so you should suffer.

Freedom of speech is meaningless when bad things are done and those who did bad things blame the bad things they did on WORDS.

Hope this cuts through & clarifies.

The eyes see. The mouth states. The ears hear. But the brain we all have clarifies.

*Sorry Lily... movie reference upcoming...

Do you think Anakin should be absolved of killing younglings i.e. kids, because he was told they are part of an effort to destroy the republic through a Jedi insurrection?

Trump is not a reason to do dumb shit. He is an excuse by dumb people to do dumb shit.

Hope we are closer to a same page now.

 

[Admin.]

Lauren's sex tape now has audio!