Even John Bolton sees it

[Admin.]

No, no one knows damn well what the MAGAverse defines as misconduct.

The GOP has given Trump a blank check for fucktardery

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

Oh, but not raping women

Adjudicated, not proved.

or grabbing their pussies because you're famous

Do you object to the fact that he said it? Or do you object to the fact that it's usually true?

or bankrupting one company after another

How many businesses have you run flawlessly?

or being a blatant racist

It's hilarious that you think that bald tire still has any tread left on it.

or having so much hate in your soul it's all you can talk about

Projection; it ain't just for theaters, eh?

or profiting off of a civil service job

That's an... odd accusation...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

or paying hush money to a porn star

Yeah, extortion is a thing nobody's ever heard of.

or offing Epstein while he was in federal custody

Are you just making shit up now?

or, I could go on...

Please do, your litany of delusions has been comedy gold so far.

Alrighty, then. What's good for the goose is apparently a fireable offense for the gander.

Basic principle:

If it's not okay for Trump, it's not okay for anybody. If it is okay for anybody, it's okay for him, too. No double standards.

 

[Admin.]

Adjudicated, not proved.

Do you object to the fact that he said it? Or do you object to the fact that it's usually true?

How many businesses have you run flawlessly?

It's hilarious that you think that bald tire still has any tread left on it.

Projection; it ain't just for theaters, eh?

That's an... odd accusation...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yeah, extortion is a thing nobody's ever heard of.

Are you just making shit up now?

Please do, your litany of delusions has been comedy gold so far.

Basic principle:

If it's not okay for Trump, it's not okay for anybody. If it is okay for anybody, it's okay for him, too. No double standards.

Too many fallacies did not read

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

Too many fallacies did not read

Yes, yes, I know, you're a lazy, cowardly cunt. Go play.

 

[Admin.]

Yes, yes, I know, you're a lazy, cowardly cunt. Go play.

If I see a dog turd on my walk, I don’t have a taste

 

[Jack]

Sho' 'nuff is. From Wikipedia:



Just like I said: Employees. And employees are liable to being fired if there's good cause to do so.

Don't be obtuse. You know they'll sue if they get "fired" and will keep their jobs while completely disrupting all the right's plans.

So let 'em do it. It'll take longer than four years to accomplish that alone, and they probably won't even accomplish that.

And watch what those bureaucrats do while on appeal. I think it's a fools gambit, but we'll see.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

Don't be obtuse. You know they'll sue if they get "fired" and will keep their jobs while completely disrupting all the right's plans.

So let 'em do it. It'll take longer than four years to accomplish that alone, and they probably won't even accomplish that.

And watch what those bureaucrats do while on appeal. I think it's a fools gambit, but we'll see.

Doesn't that more or less solidify the reason why they should be ejected? If they're that unaccountable, they're a problem that should be resolved by all available (nonviolent) means.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

If I see a dog turd on my walk, I don’t have a taste

And if you see something you don't want to examine, you loudly proclaim -- absent or even despite any evidence -- that it's a 'dog turd' so you have an excuse for your intellectual cowardice.

You're simpler than you think you are.

 

[Jack]

Doesn't that more or less solidify the reason why they should be ejected? If they're that unaccountable, they're a problem that should be resolved by all available (nonviolent) means.

I think you're conflating the difference between firing for cause and firing to replace with a loyalist. Doing the job and refusing illegal orders is not "cause". They'll sue, and win, and tie up all the courts in the process.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

I think you're conflating the difference between firing for cause and firing to replace with a loyalist. Doing the job and refusing illegal orders is not "cause". They'll sue, and win, and tie up all the courts in the process.

I didn't suggest refusing illegal directives as a valid cause. But refusing legal ones certainly is. Also, as mentioned, filming gay porn in a Capitol building.

I know many people are worried about civil servants who will later say, "I vuss chust following ordahss!" And that's a valid worry.

But I think we could all agree that the opposite attitude, "Maaan, fuck what the voters want! Fuck the American people!" is equally problematic in people who are ostensibly supposed to be working for us rather than against us.

My stance with regard to civil servants isn't overcomplicated: Do the job or get fired. They're not royalty, they're employees.

 

[Jack]

Trump doesnt want employees though. He wants yes men/women.

 

[LotusBud]

Adjudicated, not proved.

Do you object to the fact that he said it? Or do you object to the fact that it's usually true?

How many businesses have you run flawlessly?

It's hilarious that you think that bald tire still has any tread left on it.

Projection; it ain't just for theaters, eh?

That's an... odd accusation...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yeah, extortion is a thing nobody's ever heard of.

Are you just making shit up now?

Please do, your litany of delusions has been comedy gold so far.

Basic principle:

If it's not okay for Trump, it's not okay for anybody. If it is okay for anybody, it's okay for him, too. No double standards.

Trump has bankrupted his companies repeatedly. This has ZERO to do with whether or not I have run a business. This has to do with Trump's behaviors. He is a con man, and you wannabe hucksters approve, 100%. You are despicable. Calling it a bald tire because it's "old news"? I'm sorry, he doesn't get to become an admirable person because SOME of his crimes and ethical failures are old. None of the shit he does is okay. You people are rewriting the rules of democracy as you go, and you're just making shit up because you want to be a billionaire huckster like your Daddy. You're a tragic lot, and you will help usher in the death of the American Experiment. Pat yourself on the back, sycophant.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

...you will help usher in the death of the American Experiment.

Okay, now do the Powerball numbers.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

Trump doesnt want employees though. He wants yes men/women.

I don't know what his motives are. Realistically, nobody else does, either, other than him. But, yes, he's a disruptor. He wants to kick the rot out of the system, and the system has swaths of people defending it from that. Nothing surprising about that, is there?

 

[LotusBud]

Okay, now do the Powerball numbers.

Good comeback. Go suck your daddy's little dick. You love the taste of cum laced with prescription drugs, I'm sure.

 

[LotusBud]

I don't know what his motives are. Realistically, nobody else does, either, other than him. But, yes, he's a disruptor. He wants to kick the rot out of the system, and the system has swaths of people defending it from that. Nothing surprising about that, is there?

The very fact that you think he's kicking the rot out of the system rather than speeding its complete collapse is pretty fucking funny.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

Good comeback. Go suck your daddy's little dick. You love the taste of cum laced with prescription drugs, I'm sure.

Awww, look who's big mad.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

The very fact that you think he's kicking the rot out of the system rather than speeding its complete collapse is pretty fucking funny.

That's essentially the stated intention. And the system, collectively, believes it, which is why it's been throwing an 8 year (and counting) tantrum.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

Trump doesnt want employees though. He wants yes men/women.

Let's engage in a thought experiment -- put the shoe on the other foot:

Suppose the Democrats hadn't thought to kneecap Sanders, and he'd won. What do you imagine the Republicans (along with the as-yet-unrevealed warhawk/corporate-sponsored wing of the Democrats) would've spent his whole term doing?

Likely the same thing that was done in Trump's first term: constant undermining, backroom backstabbing, and other forms of "resistance."

Following that, were he to win a second term, do you think he'd be foolish enough not to do all he could to prevent or mitigate that kind of thing happening again?

Wouldn't you? Wouldn't anybody?

 

[LotusBud]

That's essentially the stated intention. And the system, collectively, believes it, which is why it's been throwing an 8 year (and counting) tantrum.

And your point? You agree that Trump is destroying democracy?

I, as I have said time and time again, am not pro status quo. The system has severe issues and needs to be corrected. But not by giving a sociopathic megalomaniac the keys to the kingdom. All that does is give you a front row seat to the End Times.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

And your point? You agree that Trump is destroying democracy?

I, as I have said time and time again, am not pro status quo. The system has severe issues and needs to be corrected. But not by giving a sociopathic megalomaniac the keys to the kingdom. All that does is give you a front row seat to the End Times.

Sister, can you TESTIFY to the Coming of the LORD-ah!

I suppose you don't get the meaning of that; it's simple: You approach this topic, and related topics, with all the level-headed impartiality of the most zealous of evangelical Southern Baptists. In summation: However rational you may be about anything else, you yeet your brain over a fucking cliff on this subject.

 

[LotusBud]

Awww, look who's big mad.

You gonna suck Trump's little dick with that?

 

[LotusBud]

Sister, can you TESTIFY to the Coming of the LORD-ah!

I suppose you don't get the meaning of that; it's simple: You approach this topic, and related topics, with all the level-headed impartiality of the most zealous of evangelical Southern Baptists. In summation: However rational you may be about anything else, you yeet your brain over a fucking cliff on this subject.

Again, accusing others of what you yourself are guilty of.

Go suck Daddy's dick while the both of you are going over the cliff, sweetie.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

Again, accusing others of what you yourself are guilty of.

I'd say 'nice try', except it was actually quite mediocre. Try harder. Really strain until you dislocate something.

 

[X]

Adjudicated, not proved.

Do you object to the fact that he said it? Or do you object to the fact that it's usually true?

How many businesses have you run flawlessly?

It's hilarious that you think that bald tire still has any tread left on it.

Projection; it ain't just for theaters, eh?

That's an... odd accusation...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Yeah, extortion is a thing nobody's ever heard of.

Are you just making shit up now?

Please do, your litany of delusions has been comedy gold so far.

Basic principle:

If it's not okay for Trump, it's not okay for anybody. If it is okay for anybody, it's okay for him, too. No double standards.

Holy fuck, imagine if you actually had any kind of a life, you wouldn’t have to do stupid shit like mega quoting trying to prove you dah man BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

Holy fuck, imagine if you actually had any kind of a life, you wouldn’t have to do stupid shit like mega quoting trying to prove you dah man BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[X]

Hahahahahahaa
You fucking multi quoting dimwit
Ffs man, I don’t think I’ve ever seen someone with quite so much time on their hands to quote like that AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Take your meds, psycho.

 

[X]

Take your meds, psycho.

Dun git mad bro, just stop being ghay

 

[LotusBud]

Hahahahahahaa
You fucking multi quoting dimwit
Ffs man, I don’t think I’ve ever seen someone with quite so much time on their hands to quote like that AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

He goes to a great deal of effort with that surface-level BS to make his arguments look like they might have even a kernel of truth or logic. The multi-quote scheme is a time-intensive level of BS that is really not worth all the trouble if you are trying to snow someone who has their wits about them. But he tries anyway.