Fuck Your "J6 Insurrection" Narrative

[Lily]

He says things that contradict your preconceptions, and -- of course -- anything which contradicts your preconceptions is "stupid". Right?

Go ahead. Deny it.

He's a stupid, screechy and ignorant man who is ill informed and Luke Beasley proved it.

 

[The Prowler]

It doesn't matter who says it; it matters what's being said.

Large @Lily makes that Logical Error so often, it is not funny.

At what point are you going to realize that she does it because she does not understand "things" on her own? That is why she said something like "I will believe it if it was written by a peer-reviewed expert." a day or two ago.

People like Lardo @Lily do not think for themselves. The are told what to "think".

 

[Lily]

Large @Lily makes that Logical Error so often, it is not funny.

At what point are you going to realize that she does it because she does not understand "things" on her own? That is why she said something like "I will believe it if it was written by a peer-reviewed expert." a day or two ago.

People like Lardo @Lily do not think for themselves. The are told what to "think".

translation: I'm desperate for an ally! Please be my friend. Pretty please.

 

[250910]

He's...ill informed

But you can't show how, because -- not having evaluated his claims -- not knowing what his claims actually are -- all you know is that he's a disaffected leftist who now contradicts...

The Narrative.

And that's really all you need to know, isn't it. Sure it is.

 

[The Prowler]

translation: I'm desperate for an ally! Please be my friend. Pretty please.

Nice argument.

Lardo @Lily is The Queen of Logical Fallacies.

 

[250910]

That is why she said something like "I will believe it if it was written by a peer-reviewed expert."

She says that because it's a form of cherry-picking.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Peer review is based on consensus, and consensus is the last refuge of ideologues.

Claims are valid or invalid irrespective of source or consensus. That position is ad principium (to the principle). But Lily deals in ad hominem, exclusively.

 

[Lily]

She says that because it's a form of cherry-picking.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Peer review is based on consensus, and consensus is the last refuge of ideologues.

Claims are valid or invalid irrespective of source or consensus. That position is ad principium (to the principle). But Lily deals in ad hominem, exclusively.

Peer reviewed is not, in fact, based on consensus. You don't know what you're talking about.

 

[The Prowler]

She says that because it's a form of cherry-picking.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Peer review is based on consensus, and consensus is the last refuge of ideologues.

She does not even understand that it is not impartial. She gets told what to "think", then she finds something that supports that "thought".

In the past she has posted peer-reviewed studies and I have scrutinized the methodology and revealed flaws in the methodology. And I am talking serious flaws. Game stoppers.

Her response has always been childish "Oh, I am sure you know more than the experts!!!"

She can never figure out that some people have an agenda and that she is being led around like a blind sheep.

 

[Lily]

So much for how the left was going to rebel and stop the certification of this election.

"Four years ago, a mob of Donald Trump supporters attacked the U.S. Capitol, sending lawmakers scrambling for safety and throwing what was traditionally a routine ceremonial process -- certifying the electoral vote -- into chaos.

Trump later was charged criminally in an unprecedented case with an alleged scheme to overturn the results 2020 election, a case only recently dropped following his presidential election victory on Nov. 5.

On Monday, Trump's win was officially certified by lawmakers in a joint session of Congress.

Vice President Kamala Harris, who was defeated by Trump, presided over the ceremony as president of the Senate."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Weeg]

Bigger than that was when Pelosi and schummer mounted the insurrection against Joe Biden and tossed him out of running for another term and replacing him with Kamala!!

 

[250910]

Peer reviewed is not, in fact, based on consensus.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

Now shut up. Just shut the fuck up until you can engage your brain. I don't want to see one more fucking word out of you until you stop being a stupid partisan cunt.

 

[The Prowler]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

Now shut up. Just shut the fuck up until you can engage your brain. I don't want to see one more fucking word out of you until you stop being a stupid partisan cunt.

Hahahahahaha!!!!

You really do not know The Leaker!!!!!


Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Lily]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

.

Now shut up. Just shut the fuck up until you can engage your brain. I don't want to see one more fucking word out of you until you stop being a stupid partisan cunt.

Why so mad, bro?

You don't like dealing with anything that contradicts your narrative, hmm?

 

[250910]

Why so mad, bro?

You don't like dealing with anything that contradicts your narrative, hmm?

I just wanted to see if you'd take the bait, and like any lab mouse, you did not disappoint. ;)

 

[Lily]

I just wanted to see if you'd take the bait, and like any lab mouse, you did not fail to disappoint. ;)

What bait? We've been exchanging posts all morning.

What did you do to "bait me" into a conversation I was already involved in?

Do you logic at all?

 

[250910]

What bait? We've been exchanging posts all morning.

What did you do to "bait me" into a conversation I was already involved in?

Do you logic at all?

You don't. Are you even sentient? Self-awareness is a requisite quality for sentience, and it's one you evidently lack.

 

[Lily]

You don't. Are you even sentient? Self-awareness is a requisite quality for sentience, and it's one you evidently lack.

I don't? You just finished posting that you baited me by one post after many posts have been exchanged between us.

Explain your logic, Kimosabe.

 

[250910]

I don't? You just finished posting that you baited me by one post after many posts have been exchanged between us.

Explain your logic, Kimosabe.

"I know everything <source> said! I'm proudly uninformed and ignorant regarding everything <source> said!"

You don't even think about what you post, do you?

 

[Lily]

"I know everything <source> said! I'm proudly uninformed and ignorant regarding everything <source> said!"

You don't even think about what you post, do you?

Answer the question I asked or are you afraid?

 

[250910]

Answer the question I asked or are you afraid?

State it in the form of a question as if this was Jeopardy.

 

[Lily]

State it in the form of a question as if this was Jeopardy.

Keep running. I like watching you squirm.

 

[250910]

Keep running. I like watching you squirm.

You don't think your question was important. In that case, I agree.

 

[Lily]

You don't think your question was important. In that case, I agree.

Your theme song:

 

[250910]

Your theme song:

You seem to think you're clever. How precious.

 

[Lily]

You seem to think you're clever. How precious.

Is that the best you have? Evading, insulting and making air claims?

 

[TheBlueCashew Enigma]

you two are acting like children.

 

[Lily]

you two are acting like children.

Thanks, Pa.

 

[TheBlueCashew Enigma]

Thanks, Pa.

welcome oakster

 

[Lily]

welcome oakster

I haven't gone by Oak for many moons now. But, hey, whatever floats your boat.

 

[The Atomic Punk]

Trump later was charged criminally in an unprecedented case with an alleged scheme to overturn the results 2020 election

Can you provide detais of the scheme?.......things like the names of the co-schemers and others? What was the step-by-step process for the scheme to be carried out?

Certainly if he was charged......there is a recird of the scheme

Thanks in advance

TAP