- Reaction score
- 14,488
- Location
- Taking a dump in Alticus' yamake
Where is the link to the info you're posting?
I've already posted evidence, go find it...
I've already posted evidence, go find it...
Have a nice day.Where is the link to the info you're posting?
I've already posted evidence, go find it...
How the fuck am I deflecting, you insufferable idiot? Go back and read what you wrote...If you're going to deflect, we're done.
Stay with the discussion, or talk to yourself.
What a coward. Don't start shit that you can't finish.Have a nice day.
It's already finished.What a coward. Don't start shit that you can't finish.
How do you explain this?It's already finished.
Again, have a nice day. We're done.
Unless you read the book and want to discuss it.
Zyklon B was used for delousing. How the fuck do alleged records of mass shootings support the existence of gas chambers?
- Documentary Evidence: Nazi documents, such as blueprints, orders for Zyklon B (the poison gas used), and records of mass shootings, supported the existence of the gas chambers and their purpose.
HAHAHAHa this one is the best... "Oyyyy... no goy, there is no evidence, but its true because we say it is!!!". The fucking chutzpah of these kikes is off the scale.
- Judicial Notice: In the United States, at least one court has taken "judicial notice" of the fact that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz, meaning the court recognized it as common knowledge and did not require additional proof.
Ashktually the exact opposite is the case. There have been numerous forensic tests carried out at various locations to try and locate piles of bones of the alleged victims, gas chambers etc and the results have drawn a blank. Heck, the accusation here is an admission of failure, where they've claimed that evidence has only been found at one concentration camp.
- Forensic Evidence: Forensic analysis conducted in Poland confirmed the presence of Prussian blue, a derivative of hydrogen cyanide, in the gas chambers, consistent with the use of Zyklon B.er.
There's a difference between disproving and denying.Zyklon B was used for delousing. How the fuck do alleged records of mass shootings support the existence of gas chambers?
HAHAHAHa this one is the best... "Oyyyy... no goy, there is no evidence, but its true because we say it is!!!". The fucking chutzpah of these kikes is off the scale.
Ashktually the exact opposite is the case. There have been multiple forensic tests carried out to try and locate piles of bones of the alleged victims, gas chambers etc and the results have drawn a blank. Heck, the accusation here is an admission where they are claiming that evidence has only been found at the one concentration camp.![]()
Bye adam!Bye Jack! Do better next time.![]()
Oh fuck off with your jewish pilpul, JAck.There's a difference between disproving and denying.
When you stop denying without evidence, we'll talk some more.
Otherwise the gas chambers were real and used for mass murder. You haven't disproven a thing.
The court evidence proves otherwise.
Post where the courts decisions were disproven and as a result were retracted and branded as misinformation? I don't see that anywhere. Your opinions about it are worthless. Show where the court's determinations were proven false? There have been no retractions to said evidence that have been proven.
Because there's nothing to address. Someone's opinion means nothing. Where's the facts?Oh fuck off with your jewish pilpul, JAck.
Jews won the war you moron. Why do you think that such nonsense allegations were accepted as truth without evidence in court?
Why do you refuse to address this?
![]()
show the docket then. What "court case"?That was taken from the court case.![]()
It's an exert from one of David Irving's court cases where he made the prosecution admit that there was no physical evidence of murderous gas chambers.show the docket then. What "court case"?
There were many "court cases" Most of which say the exact opposite.
where did the prosecution admit anything of the kind?It's an exert from one of David Irving's court cases where he made the prosecution admit that there was no physical evidence of murderous gas chambers.
How so? It was the prosecution that admitted that they couldn't prove the existence of gas chambers in court.Next? Your "proof" is bullshit.
I have yet to read any of that.How so? It was the prosecution that admitted that they couldn't prove the existence of gas chambers in court.![]()
so then...no transcripts of the prosecution admitting they didn't exist?Then you're blind.... if you stubbornly refuse to see what's there in front of you, that's your problem.
Nope, as usual you lose the argument.That's an exert from the transcripts, if you want to read the rest, go find them yourself.