Military Oath of Enlistment vs Donald John Trump

[mastersplither]

What logic? Being a Leftist Shitbag, like you, is easy as fuck. All you have to do is parrot what all the other purple-haired, nose-ringed and neck tattooed proggie kids say at their "protests." No logic involved.

Again, since you obviously have suffered a serious brain injury in your lifetime...

If one side says everything negative about Trump is true...

And the other says nothing negative about him is true...

Logic would indicate that the truth is somewhere in the middle....which would mean some of the negative things ARE true..

At least have the warped dignity that comes with being honest about the situation. You just don't CARE if any of the negative things are true. Stand your Minor Attracted Guardian Association ground proudly, soldier..

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Again, since you obviously have suffered a serious brain injury in your lifetime...

If one side says everything negative about Trump is true...

And the other says nothing negative about him is true...

Logic would indicate that the truth is somewhere in the middle....which would mean some of the negative things ARE true..

... and would also, logically, mean some positive things about Trump are then true.

OK. Let's test your theory. Name something positive about Trump and his policies that must be true then?

In my experience since the advent of mass TDS, Ive never seen one single TDS sufferer say one thing positive about Trump ever.

... Do you need permission from your Betters?

 

[mastersplither]

... and would also, logically, mean some positive things about Trump are then true.

OK. Let's test your theory. Name something positive about Trump and his policies that must be true then?

In my experience since the advent of mass TDS, Ive never seen one single TDS sufferer say one thing positive about Trump ever.

... Do you need permission from your Betters?

First Step Act and Project Warp Speed are two positive things but much of his base likely know nothing at all about them. There are other things he could/should deserve more credit for but is his own worst enemy when it comes to being counter productive.

Now, Reginald, what do you suppose is true in regards to anything negative you've seen thrown at Trump? Anything he might actually be guilty of?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

First Step Act and Project Warp Speed are two positive things but much of his base likely know nothing at all about them. There are other things he could/should deserve more credit for but is his own worst enemy when it comes to being counter productive.

Now, Reginald, what do you suppose is true in regards to anything negative you've seen thrown at Trump? Anything he might actually be guilty of?

Well, he is kind of a narcissistic asshole, but so is everyone who seeks high office.

As for "crimes" he may have committed, the thought of which gives snowflake TDS sufferers like you the tinglies, I've seen nothing definitive but rather example after example of manufactured bullshit and hoaxes.

There was the "Russia, Russia Russia" hoax, the Charlottesville "fine people on both sides" hoax, the "losers and suckers" hoax, the Jan 6 "insurrection" hoax, the "he fucked some ugly broad in a department store back in the 70s" hoax, the "34 felonies" hoax. Now there's the "Trump and Epstein fucked little girls together" hoax, but that one seems to be backfiring on the Democrats.

There's probably a few more but that's just off the top of my head.

I think the real reason your Betters hate Trump so much and why they order you Useful Idiots to hate him is because they just ain't got nothing on him.

 

[Seamajor]

Well, he is kind of a narcissistic asshole, but so is everyone who seeks high office.

As for "crimes" he may have committed, the thought of which gives snowflake TDS sufferers like you the tinglies, I've seen nothing definitive but rather example after example of manufactured bullshit and hoaxes.

There was the "Russia, Russia Russia" hoax, the Charlottesville "fine people on both sides" hoax, the "losers and suckers" hoax, the Jan 6 "insurrection" hoax, the "he fucked some ugly broad in a department store back in the 70s" hoax, the "34 felonies" hoax. Now there's the "Trump and Epstein fucked little girls together" hoax, but that one seems to be backfiring on the Democrats.

There's probably a few more but that's just off the top of my head.

I think the real reason your Betters hate Trump so much and why they order you Useful Idiots to hate him is because they just ain't got nothing on him.

Trump is a convicted felon, a rapist, and a child molester. Now think hard about this one. If Obama were clearly guilty of these crimes. Would feel the same? By the way, what has Trump done for you?

 

[mastersplither]

Well, he is kind of a narcissistic asshole, but so is everyone who seeks high office.

As for "crimes" he may have committed, the thought of which gives snowflake TDS sufferers like you the tinglies, I've seen nothing definitive but rather example after example of manufactured bullshit and hoaxes.

There was the "Russia, Russia Russia" hoax, the Charlottesville "fine people on both sides" hoax, the "losers and suckers" hoax, the Jan 6 "insurrection" hoax, the "he fucked some ugly broad in a department store back in the 70s" hoax, the "34 felonies" hoax. Now there's the "Trump and Epstein fucked little girls together" hoax, but that one seems to be backfiring on the Democrats.

There's probably a few more but that's just off the top of my head.

I think the real reason your Betters hate Trump so much and why they order you Useful Idiots to hate him is because they just ain't got nothing on him.

So, to recap: on the issue of TDS.. I'm able to point to a couple policies and cite them as positives....all while calling Trump out for problems I see.

You, on the other hand, immediately fall back on everything other than being a narcissist as a "hoax".

Trump does nothing wrong.

I think you need to reevaluate what Trump Derangement Syndrome truly means.

 

[The Question]

Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio, "Obviously, if that occurred, that would be very serious and I agree that that would be an illegal act."

He noted that leaders in the Armed Services Committee in both the House and Senate have opened investigations.

Funny, your own party says you're the one full of shit, bud. They're very aware lol

You don't read carefully.

"If that occurred... would be very serious..."

You don't actually care whether it even happened or not, you just want to fling an accusation somebody handed you.

Here's a protip for you going forward, little fella:

When you don't know what you're talking about, just don't do any talking.

Honestly, it requires literally zero effort for you to not look like a fucking mongoloid -- all you have to do is not post.

 

[The Question]

 

[Reggie_Essent]

So, to recap: on the issue of TDS.. I'm able to point to a couple policies and cite them as positives....all while calling Trump out for problems I see.

You, on the other hand, immediately fall back on everything other than being a narcissist as a "hoax".

Trump does nothing wrong.

I think you need to reevaluate what Trump Derangement Syndrome truly means.

OK. Let me make you happy, Sphincter. I completely disagree with Trump's policy regarding the Russia-Ukraine war. It's not our fight and we shouldn't be involved in any way. Let the Russians finish their little family squabble (Ukraine is one of the historical Russias) without any American treasure being expended.

There. Does that make you happy? I disagree with Trump on something.

As for any of the criminal allegations you Leftist Shitbags incessantly level at Trump, as I pointed out in my previous post, I've seen nothing but hoax after hoax after hoax.

 

[mastersplither]

You don't read carefully.

"If that occurred... would be very serious..."

You don't actually care whether it even happened or not, you just want to fling an accusation somebody handed you.

Here's a protip for you going forward, little fella:

When you don't know what you're talking about, just don't do any talking.

Honestly, it requires literally zero effort for you to not look like a fucking mongoloid -- all you have to do is not post.

Lol motherfucker if it didn't happen then why are they trying to pass the blame to Admiral Bradley?

You're about as sharp as you are successful.

 

[mastersplither]

OK. Let me make you happy, Sphincter. I completely disagree with Trump's policy regarding the Russia-Ukraine war. It's not our fight and we shouldn't be involved in any way. Let the Russians finish their little family squabble (Ukraine is one of the historical Russias) without any American treasure being expended.

There. Does that make you happy? I disagree with Trump on something.

As for any of the criminal allegations you Leftist Shitbags incessantly level at Trump, as I pointed out in my previous post, I've seen nothing but hoax after hoax after hoax.

Yeah. Nothing but hoax after hoax after hoax. You're too dim to understand why statistically that's not likely the case.

 

[The Question]

Lol motherfucker if it didn't happen then why

Are you insisting that it did?

My guess is because you're an hyper-partisan dipshit who uncritically believes every Democrat talking point you lay eyes on.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Yeah. Nothing but hoax after hoax after hoax.

I know, right? I've been waiting for, like, a real one to come along, but nothing so far. Let me know when the walls start closing in on Trump again.

 

[Seamajor]

I know, right? I've been waiting for, like, a real one to come along, but nothing so far. Let me know when the walls start closing in on Trump again.

It will happen in January Reggie. Then whos Prostrate will your nose want to go?

 

[Seamajor]

Are you insisting that it did?

My guess is because you're an hyper-partisan dipshit who uncritically believes every Democrat talking point you lay eyes on.

Easy on Reggie. It takes him a while to get it

 

[The Question]

I know, right? I've been waiting for, like, a real one to come along, but nothing so far. Let me know when the walls start closing in on Trump again.

That'll be the next news cycle. Masturbator will gobble it up like twink dick, as is his custom, then obediently puke it up here -- and nary a critical thought will cross his mind between the two actions.

 

[The Question]

Just to clarify a couple points for Mastersplither:

1. Critical thinking does not include among its foundations the concept of, "the Burden Of DIS-proof", and

2. "Anonymous" sources are of no lesser or greater evidentiary value than fictitious sources, which is why even the NYT has posited that WaPo's report has all the weight of helium.

 

[The Question]

If one side says everything negative about Trump is true...

And the other says nothing negative about him is true...

Logic would indicate that the truth is somewhere in the middle

No; a Golden Mean Fallacy would indicate that. Logic does not.

Here's an example: If I accuse you of ten crimes, and provide supporting evidence for not a single one of them, logic does not indicate that five of the accusations are true.

 

[mastersplither]

Are you insisting that it did?

My guess is because you're an hyper-partisan dipshit who uncritically believes every Democrat talking point you lay eyes on.

Lol why would they be pointing fingers about who gave the order if it didn't happen? Maaaaan goddamn you motherfuckers would die and go to hell before you'd admit Trump did absolutely anything at all wrong.

And before you predictably fall back on whoever they ultimately assign blame to, what the FUCK do you expect to happen when you appoint a Fox News talking head who was an officer in the National Guard as head of the military.

 

[mastersplither]

No; a Golden Mean Fallacy would indicate that. Logic does not.

Here's an example: If I accuse you of ten crimes, and provide supporting evidence for not a single one of them, logic does not indicate that five of the accusations are true.

That's easy to claim when you dismiss any evidence or anything at all for that matter as a hoax or a witch hunt. You struggle with logic as much as you do panhandling.

 

[mastersplither]

I asked for his cashapp to help him out, but he tried to bullshit me by giving me a nonexistent cashapp handle and tried to play dumb before trying to redirect me to his preferred means of collecting lol

 

[The Question]

That's easy to claim when you dismiss any evidence or anything at all for that matter as a hoax or a witch hunt.

You've presented claims; you haven't presented evidence. If there was any evidence, you would citing documents a good deal more substantive than hit-pieces which rely on "anonymous sources."

 

[The Question]

I asked for his cashapp to help him out, but he tried to bullshit me by giving me a nonexistent cashapp handle and tried to play dumb before trying to redirect me to his preferred means of collecting lol

As I told you; I didn't have cashapp. I set one up, for your convenience. The handle was, and is, absolutely valid.

Now, in the spirit of what we might figuratively call, "truth in advertising," I want you to change your user title to, "Sloppy Thinker." If I were being uncharitable, I might instead suggest, "Tragicomical Protomongoloid."

Note! I didn't write that I expect you to do that. But I want you to do that.

To prove my point: Did you read the above carefully -- word for word? Or are you breezing over it in a furious rush to reply with something as irrelevant as it is vitriolic?

 

[mastersplither]

As I told you; I didn't have cashapp. I set one up, for your convenience. The handle was, and is, absolutely valid.

Now, in the spirit of what we might figuratively call, "truth in advertising," I want you to change your user title to, "Sloppy Thinker." If I were being uncharitable, I might instead suggest, "Tragicomical Protomongoloid."

Note! I didn't write that I expect you to do that. But I want you to do that.

To prove my point: Did you read the above carefully -- word for word? Or are you breezing over it in a furious rush to reply with something as irrelevant as it is vitriolic?

Lol brother the first message was "do you have cashapp"

Your reply was "yes, and I'm not giving it out" before apologizing and giving me a cashapp handle.

Nowhere do you state that you didn't and you were making one for my convenience

You're honesty ranks right up there with your integrity and logic. Of course you wouldn't dare to be honest about Trump. You're a special kind of worm.

 

[The Question]

Lol brother the first message was "do you have cashapp"

Your reply was "yes, and I'm not giving it out" before apologizing and giving me a cashapp handle.

Nowhere do you state that you didn't and you were making one for my convenience

You're honesty ranks right up there with your integrity and logic. Of course you wouldn't dare to be honest about Trump. You're a special kind of worm.

If empty blathering invective is all you've got, best give it up. That stuff fails to impress.

 

[The Question]

Here:

Just in case you thought I was making it up.

 

[mastersplither]

I have the message thread still that shows our exchange went exactly as I stated. No mention from you that you lacked a cashapp and would make one for my convenience.

I also showed you that the handle you gave me didn't show up in a search.

So you either recently created that or had it so it didn't show up when people tried searching.

Very deceptive behavior, Barney Fife. These Trump niggers lie like a rug. I understand why you people admire him like you do.

 

[mastersplither]

You don't read carefully.

"If that occurred... would be very serious..."

You don't actually care whether it even happened or not, you just want to fling an accusation somebody handed you.

Everything was confirmed. Exactly what I said, you melted sack of human waste.

Here's a protip for you going forward, little fella:

When you don't know what you're talking about, just don't do any talking.

Honestly, it requires literally zero effort for you to not look like a fucking mongoloid -- all you have to do is not post.

You should seriously consider taking your own advice.

 

[The Question]

Everything was confirmed.

Confirmed by what? Not by the image you attached; or did you just spew that image in there because you thought it'd give your claim the appearance of validity, even if it added nothing of substance?

Question is... are you so stupid that you failed to notice that? Or are you so stupid that you thought I'd fail to notice that?

 

[The Question]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Now, I fully expect Masturbator to ignore that because it contradicts his prejudicial conclusion. His rejection of facts, however, does not nullify facts.