'Rogue judges must go!' MAGA panics after Musk DOGE lawsuit handed to Judge Chutkan

Jack

Squeeze the Base
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,897
Location
Upper US
An electronic filing showing that U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Tanya Chutkan
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to the legality of Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) interfering with government operations was met by a wave of outrage and anger by supporters of Donald Trump.

Chutkan, who was to oversee the trial of Trump over his involvement in the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, was forced to dismiss the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith after the president was re-elected last November.

While also dismissing cases brought against the MAGA rioters who showed up at Trump's urging, she wrote, "No pardon can change
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of what happened on January 6, 2021," before adding, "It cannot repair the jagged breach in America's sacred tradition of peacefully transitioning power."

Based on Friday's report, and sensing things may not go well for Musk who some say at times seems to be calling the shots for the president, MAGA supporters melted down at just the mention of her name.

With Chutkan assigned one of the many suits being levied against the Trump administration after only several weeks in power, Nancy Johnson, who
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to Trump on Friday, wrote on X, "
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for taking millions in bribes to ‘get Trump’ and for trying to rig the 2024 Presidential Election. This corrupt and partisan Democrat Judge should immediately recuse herself and should be nowhere near any case that has to do with the Trump Admin"

Bill Kellar, who claims to be "Sharing the uncompromised Truth of the Bible with millions online and TV since 1999," contributed, "
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
"

"America First!" fan Chuck sensed a conspiracy, writing, "Wow…..What is this now? 5 or is it 6 large cases involving Trump over the last few years “randomly” awarded to Chutkan?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(sic)."

Nobert, who boasted "Trump won," bizarrely suggested, "I wonder how much money Chutkan received
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
."

Stohr goes on to explain how Trump didn't defy judges when he was president the first time around, but noted that he appears to be "laying dangerous groundwork."

"Even Trump, for all his bluster, didn’t directly defy the judiciary in his first term. When a federal judge blocked his first travel ban in 2017, Trump blasted the ruling as 'ridiculous' and labeled the jurist a 'so-called judge' — and then complied anyway. His administration went along with Supreme Court rulings that blocked the inclusion of a citizenship question on the census and barred him from ending an Obama-era program shielding hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants from deportation," the reporter wrote Friday. "But danger signs have been growing. Trump kept trying to overturn his 2020 election defeat even after the Supreme Court unanimously turned away a bid he backed to nullify the results in four states. Trump’s recalcitrance created a stark contrast with Vice President Al Gore, who 20 years earlier told the nation he accepted the ruling that ended his presidential bid even as he disagreed with it.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
The Judicial Branch does not have authority over the Executive Branch, jack.

It's called "separation of powers" and you should have learned that in middle school.
 
OP
OP
Jack

Jack

Squeeze the Base
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,897
Location
Upper US
The Judicial Branch does not have authority over the Executive Branch, jack.

It's called "separation of powers" and you should have learned that in middle school.
The Executive Branch does not have authority over the Judicial Branch either.

It's called "separation of powers" and you should have learned that in 5th grade civics.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
The Executive Branch does not have authority over the Judicial Branch either.

It's called "separation of powers" and you should have learned that in 5th grade civics.
Exactly so. Trump can hire whomever he wants for any job he sets them to do under Article 2, Section 2 of our constitution.

There can be no "legal challenge" because there is nothing to be challenged.

"An electronic filing showing that U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Tanya Chutkan
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
bto the legality of Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) interfering with government fraud, waste and corruption ... "

Why do you (Not Democrat) TDS suffers want to protect waste, fraud and corruption?

I can't wait to watch the unhinged batshit craziness that will ensue when people (probably all Democrats) start actually getting prosecuted for looting the Treasury.

"Looting the Treasury" is in the Constitution too. You can look it up.
 
OP
OP
Jack

Jack

Squeeze the Base
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,897
Location
Upper US
Dude deal with the fact that ANY EO can be challenged in court if it's unconstitutional. Just like what's happening here.

This whole idea that "if Trump doesn't like it then he decides" is complete bullshit.

LEARN CIVICS
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
How about this: The ONLY people opposed to DOGE are criminals who are benefitting from the waste, corruption and fraud that is being uncovered every day by DOGE.

So why are YOU opposed to DOGE, jack?

How about Admin? I don't think he bought that beautiful seaside property of his on a Navy Boy's salary.

What does Admin have to hide that he's so worried about DOGE?
 
OP
OP
Jack

Jack

Squeeze the Base
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,897
Location
Upper US
How about this: The ONLY people opposed to DOGE are criminals who are benefitting from the waste, corruption and fraud that is being uncovered every day by DOGE.

So why are YOU opposed to DOGE, jack?

How about Admin? I don't think he bought that beautiful seaside property of his on a Navy Boy's salary.

What does Admin have to hide that he's so worried about DOGE?
The only people opposed to DOGE are the people upset by DOGE inserting itself into government money issues without the advice and consent of Congress. That's where the ability of DOGE to find corruption and waste lies. Not with Trump, or Musk or anybody else.

If you don't play by the rules, the rules will play you. These guardrails are here for a reason. I'm amazed I actually had to say this to you.
 

Admin.

Nobody knows more about Reciprocal Tariffs than me
Site Supporter
Reaction score
19,327
Location
Asylum Earth
How about this: The ONLY people opposed to DOGE are criminals who are benefitting from the waste, corruption and fraud that is being uncovered every day by DOGE.

So why are YOU opposed to DOGE, jack?

How about Admin? I don't think he bought that beautiful seaside property of his on a Navy Boy's salary.

What does Admin have to hide that he's so worried about DOGE?
Stfu you moron, Doge is to date subject to over 40 lawsuits, wake up and smell the Folgers you partisan puppet.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
Stfu you moron, Doge is to date subject to over 40 lawsuits, wake up and smell the Folgers you partisan puppet.
Oh Geesh! You guys are such pussies. All I'm asking is why you're all trying to stop the uncovering of all this waste, corruption and fraud and you start flinging your feces around more than usual.

Fine. Let's have a little levity then. Everyone loves the Babylon Bee:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
The only people opposed to DOGE are the people upset by DOGE inserting itself into government money issues without the advice and consent of Congress. That's where the ability of DOGE to find corruption and waste lies. Not with Trump, or Musk or anybody else.

If you don't play by the rules, the rules will play you. These guardrails are here for a reason. I'm amazed I actually had to say this to you.
So you're saying the Executive of the Executive Branch cannot audit the Executive Branch without the consent of Congress. I see ... Seems to me that USAid is under the purview of the Executive Branch, so is the Department of Education, so is the Pentagon and on down the list.

Where do you get the notion that the President has to get the permission of Congress to audit the Executive Branch?

Oh, never mind. Back to levity. You don't know you just clap like a trained seal.
 

AnnaConda

well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society.......
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,707
Location
In front of You
The Executive Branch does not have authority over the Judicial Branch either.

It's called "separation of powers" and you should have learned that in 5th grade civics.
You’re assuming he passed the 5th grade……thats a BIG assumption right thur…
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
Does no one in this forum share the same cultural literacy?

DOGE is literally where the fox is guarding the chicken coop, for fucking sakes...
Really? So all the waste, corruption and fraud uncovered in just 4 short weeks didn't happen then?

Check this one out and DOGE hasn't even gotten to HHS yet:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Sounds like someone's chicken coop has already been raided.
 
OP
OP
Jack

Jack

Squeeze the Base
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,897
Location
Upper US
Where do you get the notion that the President has to get the permission of Congress to audit the Executive Branch?
If it involves money already approved by Congress, only Congress can authorize such an audit. Not Trump. Not Musk.

Fucks with you? These are funds ALREADY APPROVED BY CONGRESS.

Jesus fucking Christ
 

AnnaConda

well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society.......
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,707
Location
In front of You
64x223uh.jpeg

when will they learn?​


Trump’s mercurial nature and proven impressionability make him the perfect sucker for an insatiably power hungry motherfucker like Musk. Like Iago, Jay Gatsby, or Tom Ripley who hustle their marks, Elon has hitched his ride to the Trump Train because he knows that once in the Oval Office, he’ll have a choice opportunity to mold and manipulate the master.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
If it involves money already approved by Congress, only Congress can authorize such an audit. Not Trump. Not Musk.

Fucks with you? These are funds ALREADY APPROVED BY CONGRESS.

Jesus fucking Christ
Where do you get that? Please cite the relevant Article and Section of the Constitution. Only Congress can appropriate funds for this agency or that, this is true, but I see no language that prevents those agencies being audited as regards those funds already allocated. And the Executive of the Executive Branch certainly does have the authority to audit spending in the agencies and departments under Executive purview.

The fuck is wrong with you? Why are you defending this corruption?

Can you show me where Congress approved Transgender Operas in Peru or DEI initiatives in Serbia?

No, of course not. Congress appropriates the monies for agencies and departments, then those agencies and departments allocate those monies ... apparently with no oversight as to where those tax dollars are going.

Apparently you don't think that we taxpayers have a right to complete transparency as to where our tax dollars are being spent.

But, your betters tell you what to think so you jump up on the colorfully painted barrel and start clapping at their command.
 
OP
OP
Jack

Jack

Squeeze the Base
Site Supporter
Reaction score
3,897
Location
Upper US
Where do you get that? Please cite the relevant Article and Section of the Constitution. Only Congress can appropriate funds for this agency or that, this is true, but I see no language that prevents those agencies being audited as regards those funds already allocated. And the Executive of the Executive Branch certainly does have the authority to audit spending in the agencies and departments under Executive purview.

The fuck is wrong with you? Why are you defending this corruption?

Can you show me where Congress approved Transgender Operas in Peru or DEI initiatives in Serbia?

No, of course not. Congress appropriates the monies for agencies and departments, then those agencies and departments allocate those monies ... apparently with no oversight as to where those tax dollars are going.

Apparently you don't think that we taxpayers have a right to complete transparency as to where our tax dollars are being spent.

But, your betters tell you what to think so you jump up on the colorfully painted barrel and start clapping at their command.
Shut up already reggie. Once Congress approves the funding it's done.

We're done....rather I'm done talking to you about this.
 

X

Human being, irreparable heart ......
Meltdown in Progress
Reaction score
-1,218
Location
here
So
MUCH TDS!
 

AnnaConda

well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society.......
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,707
Location
In front of You
Shut up already reggie. Once Congress approves the funding it's done.

We're done....rather I'm done talking to you about this.
Seriously…..don’t waste your energy on the obviously uneducated among us…..

TDS……that’s the best ya got Xy :LOL3: speaks volumes
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
Shut up already reggie. Once Congress approves the funding it's done.

We're done....rather I'm done talking to you about this.
I didn't think you were such a pussy, jack.

Yes Congress approved the funding, but you can't tell me why the executive cannot audit how those already-Congress-approved funds were spent because your betters haven't told you what to think about that yet.

Fine. Run away. Makes no nevermind to me, jack. We can crack jokes about XSplurt in the SB when we run across one another. ;)
 

Lily

Goderator ☠️
Reaction score
22,922
Location
De donde me da la gana.
Really? So all the waste, corruption and fraud uncovered in just 4 short weeks didn't happen then?

Check this one out and DOGE hasn't even gotten to HHS yet:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Sounds like someone's chicken coop has already been raided.

I don't know who this organization is that is "revealing" this fraud and I sure as hell know I don't trust the NY Post.

I know for a fact the NY Post spins their news to service the "outrage junkie" in each MAGAtard.
 

Lily

Goderator ☠️
Reaction score
22,922
Location
De donde me da la gana.
I didn't think you were such a pussy, jack.

Yes Congress approved the funding, but you can't tell me why the executive cannot audit how those already-Congress-approved funds were spent because your betters haven't told you what to think about that yet.

Fine. Run away. Makes no nevermind to me, jack. We can crack jokes about XSplurt in the SB when we run across one another. ;)

Which branch of government is granted the powers of Oversight over spending?
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
I don't know who this organization is that is "revealing" this fraud and I sure as hell know I don't trust the NY Post.

I know for a fact the NY Post spins their news to service the "outrage junkie" in each MAGAtard.
If you were a Queen and a messenger brought you bad news, you'd have the messenger executed. I see.
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
Which branch of government is granted the powers of Oversight over spending?
So you're saying that once Congress has approved funds to agencies and departments, those agencies and departments cannot be audited as to how they spent those already-allocated funds unless Congress gives permission for such an audit?

Really, Lily?
 

Reggie_Essent

An Claidheam Anam
Site Supporter
Reaction score
2,437
Location
Chicagoland
So you're saying you don't believe that HHS gave away $22 billion of our tax money to illegal alien criminals because you first read about it in the NY Post.

OK.