Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Garraty_47" data-source="post: 688345" data-attributes="member: 1547">For the sake of less argument (LoL) we'll take that as a given.The &quot;solution&quot; they sold us wasn't what they claimed publicly; their vaccine was never going to stop the pandemic because it didn't prevent people from contracting and transmitting the virus. Their vaccine was a personal prophylactic measure... it only benefited the person getting the vaccine and by &quot;benefited&quot; I mean reduced the severity of an infection that was only scary dangerous for seniors and people with comorbidities.That's how this &quot;global pandemic&quot; should have been handled:Protecting those most at risk and allowing everyone else to decide for themselves what measures to take or not take.Part of their fraudulent &quot;solution&quot; was giving already stupid wealthy pharmaceutical companies blanket immunity from lawsuits for producing and distributing (for truly staggering profits) a new and relatively untested technology under false pretenses.It was a money grab.An upward transfer of wealth that simultaneously crippled the same people it was swindling.If a &quot;solution&quot; to a global pandemic is to run a global scam maybe pick a virus that wasn't created in a lab to begin with?That kinda lends itself to the &quot;plandemic&quot; narrative a bit too easily.It's fucking sloppy.Why the hurry to transfer all that wealth and reorder society RIGHT NOW?I think we may have only seen the beginning of their shenanigans.That's the way this shit is supposed to work:If you make something that hurts people you get fucking sued.It's a fucking deterrent for the next asshole who thinks it'll be a swell idea to make something that fucking hurts people. Except it's not now, is it?Why not?Why is big pharma one of the few industries that can do whatever the fuck it wants to people in 'Murica and get at best a piddling fine; no arrests, no jail time, no admission of guilt. It couldn't be the massive amounts of money it spends on lobbying and other legalized political bribery, could it?Surely not.Or maybe...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Garraty_47, post: 688345, member: 1547"] For the sake of less argument (LoL) we'll take that as a given. The "solution" they sold us wasn't what they claimed publicly; their vaccine was never going to stop the pandemic because it didn't prevent people from contracting and transmitting the virus. Their vaccine was a personal prophylactic measure... it only benefited the person getting the vaccine and by "benefited" I mean reduced the severity of an infection that was only scary dangerous for seniors and people with comorbidities. That's how this "global pandemic" should have been handled: Protecting those most at risk and allowing everyone else to decide for themselves what measures to take or not take. Part of their fraudulent "solution" was giving already stupid wealthy pharmaceutical companies blanket immunity from lawsuits for producing and distributing (for truly staggering profits) a new and relatively untested technology under false pretenses. It was a money grab. An upward transfer of wealth that simultaneously crippled the same people it was swindling. If a "solution" to a global pandemic is to run a global scam maybe pick a virus that wasn't created in a lab to begin with? That kinda lends itself to the "plandemic" narrative a bit too easily. It's fucking sloppy. Why the hurry to transfer all that wealth and reorder society RIGHT NOW? I think we may have only seen the beginning of their shenanigans. That's the way this shit is supposed to work: If you make something that hurts people you get fucking sued. It's a fucking deterrent for the next asshole who thinks it'll be a swell idea to make something that fucking hurts people. Except it's not now, is it? Why not? Why is big pharma one of the few industries that can do whatever the fuck it wants to people in 'Murica and get at best a piddling fine; no arrests, no jail time, no admission of guilt. It couldn't be the massive amounts of money it spends on lobbying and other legalized political bribery, could it? Surely not. Or maybe... [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification