The Arizona in depth audit is a very good thing.

[Oerdin]

it will either confirm that there was no fraud as Democrats claimed or expose fraud. As a voter I do want to make sure elections are clean. This also seems like a very legitimate audit as instead of simply recounting ballotswhich would not detect fraud) they are checking for watermarks on ballots, uv sensitive ink on ballots, they are checking signatures to match with those on file, and they are checking addresses to make sure those addresses are real. All of that does sound responsible and good to me.

Democrats are having an absolute shit fit though trying to smear the audit before it even got started, they have dragged their feet every step of the way repeatedly having to be forced to comply by courts, and even as the audit got started they showed up with 80 lawyers trying every hail Mary and every dirty trick in the book to stop it. It is almost like they have something to hide. What gives?

 

[Admin.]

pity reply, no one cares

 

[Oerdin]

Democrats sure seem to care with all their frivolous lawsuits to try to stop it.

 

[Lokmar]

pity reply, no one cares

Yea they do, faggit. Even you care. In fact, you're scared.

 

[Admin.]

pity reply, no one cares

Yea they do, faggit. Even you care. In fact, you're scared.

This is just one more circle jerk in a long parade of circle jerks, you trumptards are pathetic.

 

[Lokmar]

pity reply, no one cares

Yea they do, faggit. Even you care. In fact, you're scared.

This is just one more circle jerk in a long parade of circle jerks, you trumptards are pathetic.

You're scared. Simple, really.

 

[Oerdin]

If nothing comes of it then good. More proof the election was mostly honest, but, if they do find something then that is also a good thing as stealing elections is a massive danger to Democracy.

 

[LotusBud]

it will either confirm that there was no fraud as Democrats claimed or expose fraud. As a voter I do want to make sure elections are clean. This also seems like a very legitimate audit as instead of simply recounting ballotswhich would not detect fraud) they are checking for watermarks on ballots, uv sensitive ink on ballots, they are checking signatures to match with those on file, and they are checking addresses to make sure those addresses are real. All of that does sound responsible and good to me.

Democrats are having an absolute shit fit though trying to smear the audit before it even got started, they have dragged their feet every step of the way repeatedly having to be forced to comply by courts, and even as the audit got started they showed up with 80 lawyers trying every hail Mary and every dirty trick in the book to stop it. It is almost like they have something to hide. What gives?

It's a good thing if it finds the truth rather than manipulating it.

 

[Oerdin]

It is all on camera, none cameras, and no ballot is ever off camera. The reason this is especially good is previous "audits" were just recounts where as this one looks for water marks and the microscopic dot signature of the printer used. This is good because we will be able to tell if they are official ballots or copies printed else where.

I'd give it a 90% chance no major fraud is discovered but on the off chance it is good to leave no stone unturned. That way you give the conspiracy theorists no where to run. I find it amazing Democrats are always trying to prevent such audits instead of embracing them.

 

[Lokmar]

If nothing comes of it then good. More proof the election was mostly honest, but, if they do find something then that is also a good thing as stealing elections is a massive danger to Democracy.

If nothing comes of it, we'll act like democRATs and just keep looking at the evidence until it says what we want it to. Whats good for the goose after all.

 

[Oerdin]

Courts up hold audit and deny Democrat calls to block the audit.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Joe]

The Courts should also force the Republicans to pay for re-counts in the other 49 states to be conducted simultaneously

Otherwise it seems like cherry-picking.

If a party seeks to overturn or find doubt in the final result of 1 state, it should be forced to request and pay a re-count others, even if the margin of victory was beyond a reasonable doubt since it is a national as opposed to a state election.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

pity reply, no one cares

Yea they do, faggit. Even you care. In fact, you're scared.

This is just one more circle jerk in a long parade of circle jerks, you trumptards are pathetic.

says the cock swallowing faggot who put his faith in a fucking hoax that cost taxpayers nearly 40 million

 

[Lokmar]

Look, the 2020 election was stolen from Trump. I'm disapointed he didnt call for an armed revolution!

 

[Oerdin]

Dems are calling in their brown shirts. Namely, Antifa, hoping to disrupt and prevent any honest audit of election results in Arizona. Gee, why are democrats so scared?

 

[Breakfall]

Let’s gamble...I will bet $500.00 that the democunts are guilty as fuck! Who’s up for it?