• Custom User Titles are Back!

The DOJ is suing Raul Castro.

Reaction score
2,697
Location
Chicagoland
Why has @Holliday 3000 ran away from the question?

It's a simple fucking question, pussy.

If you state that the "Jan 6th" insurrectionists should have been executed, why have you never said that the Leftist insurrectionists should have been too?

Is the question too hard for you? Is there some "nuance" that only Leftist America-Hating Scum such as yourself can understand? Help me to grok this apparent hypocrisy.
 
Reaction score
76
Location
Shangri La
If you state that the "Jan 6th" insurrectionists should have been executed, why have you never said that the Leftist insurrectionists should have been too?
Hellooo ooooh....!
. Who attempted to overthrow the federal government, threatening the lives of elected representatives including the VP who was specifically marked, and violently entered the Capitol Building?
Apples and oranges there, Reggie...not even, apples and wing nuts.
 
Reaction score
2,697
Location
Chicagoland
Hellooo ooooh....!
. Who attempted to overthrow the federal government, threatening the lives of elected representatives including the VP who was specifically marked, and violently entered the Capitol Building?
Apples and oranges there, Reggie...not even, apples and wing nuts.
Bwa Hahahahahahahaha! So you think a bunch of pissed off cons breaking a window is " attempted to overthrow the federal government, threatening the lives of elected representatives including the VP who was specifically marked?"

But a three day siege of the White House in late May, 2020, during which over 120 Federal and Capitol Police personnel were injured and during which the perimeter of the White House was so threatened that the SS evacuated the President and his family to the bunker beneath the White House somehow doesn't compare to Jan 6. I see.

(Did I mention that not one single Leftist Vermin piece of garbage scum Registered Democrat spent a single night in jail for any of that?)

Please explain the difference to me Holliday? Please explain how the siege of the White House by hate-filled Democrat filth is an apple, but Jan 6th is an orange.

Chop chop, little boy. I've given you an assignment.
 
Reaction score
2,697
Location
Chicagoland
How many entered the White House or even the grounds, Lil Regg?
I'll help so you needn't hurt yourself looking it up.

...ZERO
Total fail, little fishie boy.

The question was pretty simple: How is the one insurrection an apple and how is the other an orange.

It's clear you don't know because, let's face it friend, you're fucking stupid.

Let me help you: If the hate filled Democrats in the one insurrection had managed to break a window in the White House, would that have raised the apple insurrection to the level of an orange insurrection?

That's kind of what you just said, but I want to be clear that that is your position before I point at you and laugh some more.
 
Reaction score
2,697
Location
Chicagoland
He go arrested for Rape in Compton, sap
You sent Diego to Compton?! WTF is wrong with you?

Much like you. What else could it be?
. Were the protestors intent on overthrowing the federal government?
In the apples case, no. In the wing nut case, yes.
Jan 6, the intent was to overthrow democratic rule.
So you know what was in the minds of all those hate-filled Democrat filth that rioted for three straight days, do you? Tell me, Holliday, what was their "intent" when they set historic St. John's Church on fire? WHat was their "intent" when they tried to pull down the statue of Andrew Jackson in Lafeyette Park across the street from the White House? What was their "intent" when they were trying to push over the fence of the White House grounds?

Do you KNOW what the "intent" was of the violent Democrats during the Apple Insurrection?

Yet you claim the know the "intent" of the Jan 6th rioters, huh?

You keep failing, Holliday.
 
Reaction score
2,697
Location
Chicagoland
Yes, of course I do, Reggie. How many times have you accused me of being one of them, and being one don't you think I would know what they were thinking?
Therefore you can answer the question as to what was in the minds and what was the intent of those paid Antifa agitators and those paid BLM niggers that tried to break into the White House in May of 2020.

Please answer in detail.

Then I will ask you what was in the mind and what was the intent of the granny from Idaho who was waved into the Capitol on Jan 6th by Capitol Police, wandered around and took pictures for a bit, then went back home to Idaho only to be tracked down by the FBI months later, arrested, transported to Washington DC and incarcerated for months before her "Hearing" and them given a lengthy probation sentence.

You can look it up. Do you think the "intent" of the granny from Idaho was to overthrow the government?

Yet again I'll remind you -- not one single Registered Democrat Antifa punk of BLM nigger spent so much as a single night in jail for the Apple Insurrection. You should have looked that up by now.

How disappointing you have been today.
 

The Question

What can one man do?
Reaction score
-406
Location
Concealed Within Each Of You
8EGHTJz.jpeg

This photograph is an indictment of historical amnesia.
A kneeling man awaits execution. A priest bends down to offer the final rites of the Catholic faith. Behind them stand armed revolutionaries — men celebrated by generations of Western intellectuals, activists, celebrities, and college students as symbols of justice and liberation. The image is disturbing not simply because of the death about to occur, but because history chose to romanticize many of the men holding the rifles while forgetting the man on his knees.
For decades, Fidel Castro and Che Guevara were packaged for the world as heroic rebels fighting oppression. Che’s face became a global fashion logo — stamped onto T-shirts, dorm room posters, coffee mugs, and protest banners. Entire generations wore the image without ever confronting what happened in the aftermath of the Cuban Revolution: firing squads, prison camps, censorship, disappearances, political executions, religious persecution, and the destruction of dissent.
At La Cabaña fortress, Che Guevara personally supervised revolutionary tribunals and executions. Many of those trials lasted minutes. The accused were often condemned before they even entered the room. To the revolution, mercy became weakness and opposition became treason. The machinery of ideological purity always requires enemies.
And yet modern culture still treats these figures with a reverence that would never be extended to authoritarian figures from the political right. That double standard matters. We condemn tyranny selectively depending on whether the slogans sound fashionable enough.
The most haunting part of this image is not the rifles. It is the priest.
In the middle of political fanaticism, propaganda, and revolutionary rage, one man still kneels beside another human being and acknowledges his dignity before death. That act stands in direct contrast to every ideology that reduces people to obstacles, statistics, or enemies of the state. The priest saw a soul. The regime saw a problem to eliminate.
That is the lesson history keeps trying to teach us: once politics becomes a substitute for morality, cruelty becomes easy to justify. Every authoritarian movement eventually convinces itself that its victims somehow deserve what is coming to them. The language changes. The flags change. The slogans change. Human nature does not.
This image survives because it exposes the lie that violence becomes noble simply because it is wrapped in revolutionary language. It reminds us that some of history’s most celebrated “liberators” built systems that depended on fear, silence, and death. And it forces an uncomfortable question upon modern society:
Why are some executioners remembered as murderers — while others become fashion icons?
 

Admin.

Choosy Moms Choose Me
Reaction score
17,862
Location
Tralfamadore
8EGHTJz.jpeg

This photograph is an indictment of historical amnesia.
A kneeling man awaits execution. A priest bends down to offer the final rites of the Catholic faith. Behind them stand armed revolutionaries — men celebrated by generations of Western intellectuals, activists, celebrities, and college students as symbols of justice and liberation. The image is disturbing not simply because of the death about to occur, but because history chose to romanticize many of the men holding the rifles while forgetting the man on his knees.
For decades, Fidel Castro and Che Guevara were packaged for the world as heroic rebels fighting oppression. Che’s face became a global fashion logo — stamped onto T-shirts, dorm room posters, coffee mugs, and protest banners. Entire generations wore the image without ever confronting what happened in the aftermath of the Cuban Revolution: firing squads, prison camps, censorship, disappearances, political executions, religious persecution, and the destruction of dissent.
At La Cabaña fortress, Che Guevara personally supervised revolutionary tribunals and executions. Many of those trials lasted minutes. The accused were often condemned before they even entered the room. To the revolution, mercy became weakness and opposition became treason. The machinery of ideological purity always requires enemies.
And yet modern culture still treats these figures with a reverence that would never be extended to authoritarian figures from the political right. That double standard matters. We condemn tyranny selectively depending on whether the slogans sound fashionable enough.
The most haunting part of this image is not the rifles. It is the priest.
In the middle of political fanaticism, propaganda, and revolutionary rage, one man still kneels beside another human being and acknowledges his dignity before death. That act stands in direct contrast to every ideology that reduces people to obstacles, statistics, or enemies of the state. The priest saw a soul. The regime saw a problem to eliminate.
That is the lesson history keeps trying to teach us: once politics becomes a substitute for morality, cruelty becomes easy to justify. Every authoritarian movement eventually convinces itself that its victims somehow deserve what is coming to them. The language changes. The flags change. The slogans change. Human nature does not.
This image survives because it exposes the lie that violence becomes noble simply because it is wrapped in revolutionary language. It reminds us that some of history’s most celebrated “liberators” built systems that depended on fear, silence, and death. And it forces an uncomfortable question upon modern society:
Why are some executioners remembered as murderers — while others become fashion icons?
Cool story Pedro, too bad it’s just more right wing bullshit, it’s a Cuban Soldier from the Batista regime, not an innocent peasant farmer. Cowards who never put on a uniform seem to overlook the risks involved of being in the military.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Reaction score
3,434
Location
Milwaukee
Cool story Pedro, too bad it’s just more right wing bullshit, it’s a Cuban Soldier from the Batista regime, not an innocent peasant farmer. Cowards who never put on a uniform seem to overlook the risks involved of being in the military.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
An army corporal? That still makes the Castros look bad because it seems that there wasn't any legitimate cut off on ranks that are guilty of war crimes. Just unfair, IMO