They all hate us anyhow, So let's drop the big one now

[Dove]

I asked you what a Representative Democracy is. Can you answer that, Duhvtard?

That isnt what you asked me at all.

Now you are just throwing words around and hoping for the best.

 

[Dove]

Can you explain how being a constitutional republic excludes being a democracy, you 16th witted bonobo?

This is what you asked, H.

And i said

I never said that and i have specifically stated we have democratic processes. Like voting.

You 95 year old 0th witted mongo.

And you quoted another post of mine and claimed i never answered you.

I absolutely answered you. Now you are playing semantics like a narcissist.

Quoting Orwell as if you arent saying in this thread that people on the wrong side of your politcal beliefs should be killed as traitors.

 

[The New Holliday]

That isnt what you asked me at all. Not more than 3 times anyway

Now you are just throwing words around and hoping for the best.

I asked you if constitutional republic and democracy are mutually exclusive.
. Do you know what a Representative Democracy is? How about Democratic Republic?

You have not answered. What is a Democratic Republic? Start there.

I asked you what a Representative Democracy is. Can you answer that, Duhvtard?

 

[Dove]

I answered you, twice.

You are intentionally trying to manipulate a certain answer out of me so you can force your preconcieved ideas and fantasies into my posts.

Trying to push me into whatever thought crime is giving you the biggest tyranny boner at the moment. And you are getting ridiculous. I answered you. Nothing changes if you slap "representative" before democracy. My same answer applies. Its just redundant but....you are trying real hard.

I know what youre doing, H. I see right through you. So does Regg. I can tell.

 

[Admin.]

If I am elected all supporters of maga will be deported to some random shit hole country, like Namibia or something.

 

[Dove]

If I am elected all supporters of maga will be deported to some random shit hole country, like Namibia or something.

You wouldnt be able to.

Every country has immigration laws. Js.

 

[The New Holliday]

I answered you, twice.

You may have replied twice but that is not the same as having answered the question asked...which you have not.

 

[The New Holliday]

If I am elected all supporters of maga will be deported to some random shit hole country, like Namibia or something.

Gosh I love democracy.
. Down with authoritarianism !

 

[The New Holliday]

You wouldnt be able to.

Every country has immigration laws. Js.

Laws?...We doan have no laws.
We doan need no stinkin laws.

 

[Admin.]

Gosh I love democracy.
. Down with authoritarianism !

Oh yess, I hate having choices!

 

[Dove]

You may have replied twice but that is not the same as having answered the question asked...which you have not.

No kidding?

Good thing i directly answered you twice. And showed you again where i answered you.

Im a kind and patient soul.

 

[The New Holliday]

No kidding?

Good thing i directly answered you twice.

Link to your definition of Democratic Republic and Representative Democracy.
. I've quoted the 3 separate times I've asked you previously.
You have not answered.

Didn't anyone teach you how to parrot an answer to that question?

 

[The New Holliday]

For anybody:
Is the judicial system a democratic institution?
. What does it mean when the Executive (POTUS) says he/she will abide by court rulings if he agrees with it, but not otherwise?

 

[Dove]

Link to your definition of Democratic Republic and Representative Democracy.
. I've quoted the 3 separate times I've asked you previously.
You have not answered.

Didn't anyone teach you how to parrot an answer to that question?

I blatantly answered you. I told you twice we are a constitutional republic and we have democratic processes and elements. Like voting.

And this has apparently melted your brain. You are desperately trying to grasp at straws for a way to turn "constitutional republic" into an example of "Trumps authoritarianism" and claim i support "Trumps authoritarianism".

Im not answering you in a manner that helps you twist my words easily enough so you are just claiming im not answering at all.

Again i see through you. And also....you openly support killing your politcal opposition. So. Yeah.

 

[The New Holliday]

I blatantly answered you. I told you twice we are a constitutional republic and we have democratic processes and elements. Like voting.

That is not a definition of either.
I also asked you if being a Constitutional Republic (could you define that?) was mutually exclusive from a Democracy. Could you answer that, not by claiming that you have when you clearly have not?

And this has apparently melted your brain. You are desperately trying to grasp at straws for a way to turn "constitutional republic" into an example of "Trumps authoritarianism" and claim i support "Trumps authoritarianism".

I'm not doing any such thing at all. In fact, I think he despises the very idea of the Constitution.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

That is not a definition of either.
I also asked you if being a Constitutional Republic (could you define that?) was mutually exclusive from a Democracy. Could you answer that, not by claiming that you have when you clearly have not?

It's funny you keep asking Doves to answer your question when you never answered mine regarding the Leftist definition of their use of the term "our democracy."

We hear it all the time from you TDS tards. What, exactly, do you mean when you say "our democracy?"

 

[The New Holliday]

What, exactly, do you men when you say "our democracy?"

Quote me where I wrote "our democracy?".

 

[Jack]

So in other words, you dont believe that Biden actually got 81 million votes either.

he actually did.

We all know it wasn't Joe.

Really? Got some proof or is this more of your hate speech?

 

[The New Holliday]

I've posted this before for your benefit, but I doubt you've ever read it, or if you have you ever understood how it applies to DJ Trump, but here for your reading pleasure it is again:

I must say I believe, or fear, that taking the world as a whole these things are on the increase. Hitler, no doubt, will soon disappear, but only at the expense of strengthening (a) Stalin, (b) the Anglo-American millionaires and © all sorts of petty fuhrers of the type of de Gaulle. All the national movements everywhere, even those that originate in resistance to German domination, seem to take non-democratic forms, to group themselves round some superhuman fuhrer (Hitler, Stalin, Salazar, Franco, Gandhi, De Valera are all varying examples) and to adopt the theory that the end justifies the means. Everywhere the world movement seems to be in the direction of centralised economies which can be made to ‘work’ in an economic sense but which are not democratically organised and which tend to establish a caste system. With this go the horrors of emotional nationalism and a tendency to disbelieve in the existence of objective truth because all the facts have to fit in with the words and prophecies of some infallible fuhrer. Already history has in a sense ceased to exist, ie. there is no such thing as a history of our own times which could be universally accepted, and the exact sciences are endangered as soon as military necessity ceases to keep people up to the mark. Hitler can say that the Jews started the war, and if he survives that will become official history. He can’t say that two and two are five, because for the purposes of, say, ballistics they have to make four. But if the sort of world that I am afraid of arrives, a world of two or three great superstates which are unable to conquer one another, two and two could become five if the fuhrer wished it. That, so far as I can see, is the direction in which we are actually moving, though, of course, the process is reversible.

As to the comparative immunity of Britain and the USA. Whatever the pacifists etc. may say, we have not gone totalitarian yet and this is a very hopeful symptom. I believe very deeply, as I explained in my book The Lion and the Unicorn, in the English people and in their capacity to centralise their economy without destroying freedom in doing so. But one must remember that Britain and the USA haven’t been really tried, they haven’t known defeat or severe suffering, and there are some bad symptoms to balance the good ones. To begin with there is the general indifference to the decay of democracy. Do you realise, for instance, that no one in England under 26 now has a vote and that so far as one can see the great mass of people of that age don’t give a damn for this? Secondly there is the fact that the intellectuals are more totalitarian in outlook than the common people. On the whole the English intelligentsia have opposed Hitler, but only at the price of accepting Stalin. Most of them are perfectly ready for dictatorial methods, secret police, systematic falsification of history etc. so long as they feel that it is on ‘our’ side. Indeed the statement that we haven’t a Fascist movement in England largely means that the young, at this moment, look for their fuhrer elsewhere. One can’t be sure that that won’t change, nor can one be sure that the common people won’t think ten years hence as the intellectuals do now. I hope they won’t, I even trust they won’t, but if so it will be at the cost of a struggle. If one simply proclaims that all is for the best and doesn’t point to the sinister symptoms, one is merely helping to bring totalitarianism nearer.

You also ask, if I think the world tendency is towards Fascism, why do I support the war. It is a choice of evils—I fancy nearly every war is that. I know enough of British imperialism not to like it, but I would support it against Nazism or Japanese imperialism, as the lesser evil. Similarly I would support the USSR against Germany because I think the USSR cannot altogether escape its past and retains enough of the original ideas of the Revolution to make it a more hopeful phenomenon than Nazi Germany. I think, and have thought ever since the war began, in 1936 or thereabouts, that our cause is the better, but we have to keep on making it the better, which involves constant criticism.

Yours sincerely,
Geo. Orwell (1944)

Yes, both Stalin and Hitler required oaths of fealty from their citizens and military personnel. Hitler's "Hitler Oath" required unconditional obedience to himself, while Stalin enforced loyalty through various methods, including oaths of allegiance to the Soviet state and the Communist Party.

Elaboration:

• Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
  :
  .Opens in new tab
  In Nazi Germany, a mandatory oath of allegiance known as the "Hitler Oath" was introduced in 1935. It required individuals to pledge unconditional obedience to Adolf Hitler, the "Führer," and to be prepared to sacrifice their lives for the oath.
  
  
• Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
  
  While Stalin didn't have a specific oath with the same formal name as Hitler's, he utilized similar methods to enforce loyalty. This included loyalty oaths to the Soviet state and to the Communist Party. The Communist Party was the ruling party in the Soviet Union, and individuals who wanted to advance in their careers were expected to demonstrate loyalty.
• 
  
• Guess who elss requires loyalty oaths? (no, not sleepy Joe)

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Quote me where I wrote "our democracy?".

Your Leftist Filth betters are constantly saying Trump is a threat to "our democracy."

What do they mean by "our?"

It's not too hard of a question, is it, Holli?

 

[The New Holliday]

Your Leftist Filth betters are constantly saying Trump is a threat to "our democracy."

What do they mean by "our?"

It's not too hard of a question, is it, Holli?

Quote me where I wrote "our democracy?".

Is this yet another thing you can't do, like provide actual evidence of the stole uhlekshun?

 

[Reggie_Essent]

he actually did.

Really? Got some proof or is this more of your hate speech?

I guess the lying' eyes of the entire world were wrong and you must believe that Biden was in charge.

You are aware of the many "tell all" books that are coming out nowadays where Biden Administration members and Media people are talking about just how incapacitated Joe Biden was for his entire Administration.

I guess you don't find it disturbing that the country was being run by people who were not elected, but I guess since they were all Registered Democrat Vile Filth Leftist Scum, that's OK with you, huh?

 

[The New Holliday]

I guess the lying' eyes of the entire world were wrong and you must believe that Biden was in charge.

You are aware of the many "tell all" books that are coming out nowadays where Biden Administration members and Media people are talking about just how incapacitated Joe Biden was for his entire Administration.

I guess you don't find it disturbing that the country was being run by people who were not elected, but I guess since they were all Registered Democrat Vile Filth Leftist Scum, that's OK with you, huh?

Like that Nancy Reagan...she was never elected.

 

[Reggie_Essent]

Is this yet another thing you can't do, like provide actual evidence of the stole uhlekshun?

Please provide evidence that you are not mentally impaired?

Remember how you guys made up the term "election denier?" Remember how Pennsylvania changed the election rules during the election? Remember how mass mail-in ballots were mailed out to everyone? (I got 5 of them here in Illinois.)

The 2020 election was stolen by Democrat filth. Period. If you think otherwise, you condone the ballot fraud which makes you an unAmerican traitor who sucks at catching fishies.

 

[The New Holliday]

Remember how you guys made up the term "election denier?"

I make up lots of werds and names and stuff, but not that one, Ragtard.

The 2020 election was stolen by Democrat filth. Period.

See, now I said that air claims don't count. See if you can find actual demonstrable proofs.
It's okay if you can't. We already know you can't.

 

[Joe]

Wait! So you hate half of America too. Good to know, cunt.

Yknow the Republicans could have chosen a more appealing leader then the world would hate ya'll only half as much @Reggie_Essent

 

[Reggie_Essent]

I make up lots of werds and names and stuff, but not that one, Ragtard.

See, now I said that air claims don't count. See if you can find actual demonstrable proofs.
It's okay if you can't. We already know you can't.

Not even a creative deflection. Spoon would be disappointed.

Yknow the Republicans could have chosen a more appealing leader then the world would hate ya'll only half as much @Reggie_Essent

Canadians don't get to have opinions, Joe. You're a foreigner, and until the western Canadian Provinces become American States, you don't get a say.

 

[Joe]

Canadians don't get to have opinions, Joe. You're a foreigner, and until the western Canadian Provinces become American States, you don't get a say.

Actually @Reggie_Essent Canada could become part of the EU before that happens. So you'll have European troops, planes & ships sittin on your borders Reggie.

 

[Seamajor]

You're a moronic cult member if you believe any of that crap...

Sorry DD. You missed out. Stuck broke forever. Maybe SA would have a better place for ya.

 

[Seamajor]

But rioters in Portland literally laying siege on the local precinct with police trapped inside for days was just needed for your cause right?

And yes this matters because the Portland precinct and all the anti cop violence went on long before Jan 6th so if you were okay with all that...and you were....no one should take your convenient and fake concern for these cops seriously. At all.

If it had been lefties who did this instead of your opposition youd be defending it.

No one should take it seriously when you pretend this is bad ONLY because "the right" did it.

Hey Dove. I don’t recall these protesters shitting all over the place like J6. Classy