Trump: He shows us who we are.

[The Prowler]

It's more of the same "everyone who votes for Trump is evil and ugly and sunhuman".

Still with that narrative.

For a week I thought maybe people would start having actual conversations but....nope.

No, they are hateful people.

They want conflict because they are unhappy. Misery loves company. They want everyone to be unhappy.

Even if the vote went their way, they would not be celebrating out of hope and positivity. They would just want to rub it into Republican voters.

 

[The Prowler]

How do you get to define what she is?

Hahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just like gender, leftists think ethnicity can be defined by the individual.

This is hilarious!!!!

 

[The Prowler]

You can keep mischaracterizing it that way all you want. It wasn't true the first time you did it, it won't be true the 100,000th time you do it.

 

[AnnaConda]

 

[Cookie Monster]

Hahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just like gender, leftists think ethnicity can be defined by the individual.

This is hilarious!!!!

I avoided responding in case that level of stupidity was contagious.

 

[Admin.]

I avoided responding in case that level of stupidity was contagious.

Are you a knee-grow, is that how you can tell Kamala isn’t up to your blackness standards?

 

[The New Holliday]

I didn't click on it. Is it some pussy faggot Leftist shitball like you whining because he just found out America hates him and he sucks?

Now, when you say "America", you mean the fewer than 50% who voted for Trump?
. I'm surprised to see you expressing a bias, Raggs.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

Now, when you say "America", you mean the fewer than 50% who voted for Trump?

49.9% Trump. 48.3% Harris.

Neither candidate broke 50%. But you weren't going to include that context, were you, because you're a dishonest bag of ass.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

American Enjoying the spoils in six months.

Do the Powerball numbers next, Miss Cleo.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

Is too.

She's half Jamaican, half Indian... until you put her in front of a microphone; then she's half chameleon and half hyena.

 

[The New Holliday]

49.9% Trump. 48.3% Harris.

Neither candidate broke 50%. But you weren't going to include that context, were you, because you're a dishonest bag of ass.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Well, we know that "info". There is nothing hidden about it.
.Were you deprived of speaking all day? Did you just "HAVE TO" say something?

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

Well, we know that "info".

Now, when you say "America", you mean the fewer than 50% who voted for Trump?

Then who were you counting on to not know that information? Clearly, you hoped @Reggie_Essent didn't know it, or you wouldn't have brought it up in a one-sided fashion like that.

But backpedal harder, I want to see you fall off the bike.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

She's half Jamaican, half Indian... until you put her in front of a microphone; then she's half chameleon and half hyena.

Come to think of it, had they put that inauthentic plastic twat in front of a plumbers' association in Brooklyn, I can readily believe she'd have popped up in coveralls and a glued-on mustache, then yelled, "IT'S-A ME, KAMALIO!"

 

[The New Holliday]

Then who were you counting on to not know that information?

No one. The info you imagined yourself supplying wasn't relevant. What was, was the suggestion that "America" equals less than 50 % of the voting public.

.Just curious, Messenger Bwoi 6. I have commented many a time that no one can troll above their level of intelligence - that is, above that of the poster they are principally known as. My question to you is...:
.. Are you really as stupid as you present yourself?

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

The info you imagined yourself supplying wasn't relevant.

Then neither was the one side of it you presented.

Get more upset about being called out for your dishonesty, though. I want to see you have a big, sloppy meltdown about it.

 

[The New Holliday]

Then neither was the one side of it you presented.

Get more upset about being called out for your dishonesty, though. I want to see you have a big, sloppy meltdown about it.

Good luck. When you attempt to shot, but cleanly miss your target (which is usually) I just laugh at you.
LoLz @ Messenger Bwoi Sux

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

LoLz @ Messenger Bwoi Sux

Cheap little riffs like that are gonna look even dumber when I change my username.

 

[The New Holliday]

Cheap little riffs like that are gonna look even dumber when I change my username.

You're going to look even dumber when you do. I know, peeps are thinking that isn't possible...
...but it is.

 

[Admin.]

She's half Jamaican, half Indian... until you put her in front of a microphone; then she's half chameleon and half hyena.

I'm astonished at how little of their own history Conservatives possess.



The one-drop rule was a legal principle that defined a person as Black if they had any African ancestry:

• Definition: The rule stated that a single drop of Black blood made a person Black.
  
  
  
  
• Origin: The rule originated in the South and dates back to a 1662 Virginia law.
  
  
  
  
• Purpose: The rule was based on false theories of white superiority and "racial purity". It was a social rule, not a scientific one, and had more to do with discriminatory ideas and political motivations than biological analysis.
  
  
  
  
• Impact: The rule shaped the African-American race and defined a large part of American history. It created the idea that a person was either Black or not Black, and multiracial status did not matter.
  
  
  
  
• Other names: The rule is also known as the "one black ancestor rule" or "hypo-descent". xx

 

[The New Holliday]

I'm astonished at how little of their own history Conservatives possess.



The one-drop rule was a legal principle that defined a person as Black if they had any African ancestry:

• Definition: The rule stated that a single drop of Black blood made a person Black.
  
  
  
  
• Origin: The rule originated in the South and dates back to a 1662 Virginia law.
  
  
  
  
• Purpose: The rule was based on false theories of white superiority and "racial purity". It was a social rule, not a scientific one, and had more to do with discriminatory ideas and political motivations than biological analysis.
  
  
  
  
• Impact: The rule shaped the African-American race and defined a large part of American history. It created the idea that a person was either Black or not Black, and multiracial status did not matter.
  
  
  
  
• Other names: The rule is also known as the "one black ancestor rule" or "hypo-descent". xx

Yes, but does anyone today (2024) have to live by it as more than a matter of convenience?

 

[Admin.]

Yes, but does anyone today (2024) have to live by it as more than a matter of convenience?

No not at all, I am just amused at how important it is for the cons of the forum to deny or decide what Kamala's race is, it's not like being one race or other gives a candidate bonus Electoral College electors.

 

[The New Holliday]

No not at all, I am just amused at how important it is for the cons of the forum to deny or decide what Kamala's race is, it's not like being one race or other gives a candidate bonus Electoral College electors.

Though there is a political calculation to draw support, as well as a liability.

 

[The New Holliday]

Though there is a political calculation to draw support, as well as a liability.

I mean, all I'm really saying here, is that people in the 2024 should be objective and educated enough not to vote for Trump simply because he is old, white and rich, aka..."establishment"...yet they do.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

I'm astonished at how little of their own history Conservatives possess.

I'm not the least bit astonished at how brazenly you lie about it. From Joy Reid to Barack Obama, it was Democrats pushing her race, and decrying as "racist" or "sexist" anybody who didn't vote for her skin color and genital configuration instead of her competence and character.

 

[Admin.]

I'm not the least bit astonished at how brazenly you lie about it. From Joy Reid to Barack Obama, it was Democrats pushing her race, and decrying as "racist" or "sexist" anybody who didn't vote for her skin color and genital configuration instead of her competence and character.

I see.

 

[Mr. Wednesday]

I mean, all I'm really saying here, is that people in the 2024 should be objective and educated enough not to vote for Trump simply because he is old, white and rich, aka..."establishment"...yet they do.

Yeah. He's "establishment" -- never mind that the entire establishment has been howling for his blood (not always metaphorically) since 2015.

 

[Lily]

You can keep mischaracterizing it that way all you want. It wasn't true the first time you did it, it won't be true the 100,000th time you do it.

You can deny it all the live long day. You don't ever seem to be enjoying yourself. Unless dour is your "happy place".

 

[Lily]

No not at all, I am just amused at how important it is for the cons of the forum to deny or decide what Kamala's race is, it's not like being one race or other gives a candidate bonus Electoral College electors.

Who endowed Conservatives with the power to decide what race/ethnicity, etc a stranger is?

I find this very odd.

 

[Admin.]

Yeah. He's "establishment" -- never mind that the entire establishment has been howling for his blood (not always metaphorically) since 2015.

Is the entire establishment in the room now?

 

[Lily]

Is the entire establishment in the room now?

He only hates the "establishment" because he's a low rent short fingered vulgarian who was never accepted into Manhattan society that he so badly craved.