Why are Conservatives such Primitive Tribalists?

[Frood]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

He is 12 years old. He shouldn't be holding any political signs. He should be riding his bike with his friends or learning a few household skills.

So it's okay for adults to attack him? He isnt allowed to be interested in politics or support a president?

Okay so Caskur is offended that a 12 year old took an interest she doesnt think he should take but not that a grown adult attacked him.

I seriously cannot believe how many fucked up people hang out here who excuse illegal and abusive behaviour simply because they dont personally like what that person was doing.

Reality doesn't work like that. No one is entitled to assault someone.

This bad logic is the same as the "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldnt have been there, so he didn't have a right to defend hinself" which is wrong, and the "Well Secoriea Turners mom shouldnt have driven down that road"

No......there is no excuse for violence, and if someone attacks another person that person has a right to defend themselves. People do not get a pass to attack kids.

It doesnt MATTER that you think he should have been riding his bike. That is an idiotic, lazy way of thinking.

We should be educating and encouraging our kids to participate civilly in democracy. I'm sure that kid also rides his bike and does other things, but in America we do not physically attack people for different political stances least of all children who are taking an interest in their country.

What you just said, discouraging kids from learning and getting to take part in things is probably why we have overgrown spoiled brats who think violence is preferable over civil discourse.

It is the responsibility of adults to manage their own behavior and take responsibility over themselves. A concept I've noticed is beyond you.

He was a minor illegally carrying an assault riffle dimbulb. He should have been home with his family no ifs or buts about it. It is not the job of pizzafaced 17 year olds to self deputize and run around brandishing assault riffles in violent mobs faces..... duh!!!

It wasn't an assault rifle, it isn't illegal for 17 year olds to have rifles, he was a fully trained EMT, lifeguard, and in a police cadet styled program.

He also had finely honed self preservation instincts and was a diligent and measured marksman.

The US isn't Australia.

If he was standing in front of his own family home and gunned down a maurauding mob, I would agree with self defence but I stand by my original comment. See what happens in court. You'll have to wait and see.

He'll get off unless civil rights and justice don't matter anymore...

 

[Breakfall]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

He is 12 years old. He shouldn't be holding any political signs. He should be riding his bike with his friends or learning a few household skills.

So it's okay for adults to attack him? He isnt allowed to be interested in politics or support a president?

Okay so Caskur is offended that a 12 year old took an interest she doesnt think he should take but not that a grown adult attacked him.

I seriously cannot believe how many fucked up people hang out here who excuse illegal and abusive behaviour simply because they dont personally like what that person was doing.

Reality doesn't work like that. No one is entitled to assault someone.

This bad logic is the same as the "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldnt have been there, so he didn't have a right to defend hinself" which is wrong, and the "Well Secoriea Turners mom shouldnt have driven down that road"

No......there is no excuse for violence, and if someone attacks another person that person has a right to defend themselves. People do not get a pass to attack kids.

It doesnt MATTER that you think he should have been riding his bike. That is an idiotic, lazy way of thinking.

We should be educating and encouraging our kids to participate civilly in democracy. I'm sure that kid also rides his bike and does other things, but in America we do not physically attack people for different political stances least of all children who are taking an interest in their country.

What you just said, discouraging kids from learning and getting to take part in things is probably why we have overgrown spoiled brats who think violence is preferable over civil discourse.

It is the responsibility of adults to manage their own behavior and take responsibility over themselves. A concept I've noticed is beyond you.

He was a minor illegally carrying an assault riffle dimbulb. He should have been home with his family no ifs or buts about it. It is not the job of pizzafaced 17 year olds to self deputize and run around brandishing assault riffles in violent mobs faces..... duh!!!

It wasn't an assault rifle, it isn't illegal for 17 year olds to have rifles, he was a fully trained EMT, lifeguard, and in a police cadet styled program.

He also had finely honed self preservation instincts and was a diligent and measured marksman.

The US isn't Australia.

If he was standing in front of his own family home and gunned down a maurauding mob, I would agree with self defence but I stand by my original comment. See what happens in court. You'll have to wait and see.

He'll get off unless civil rights and justice don't matter anymore...

She has no interest in the kid. Read between the lines and you’ll realise what she’s really trying to say and to whom...

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

He is 12 years old. He shouldn't be holding any political signs. He should be riding his bike with his friends or learning a few household skills.

So it's okay for adults to attack him? He isnt allowed to be interested in politics or support a president?

Okay so Caskur is offended that a 12 year old took an interest she doesnt think he should take but not that a grown adult attacked him.

I seriously cannot believe how many fucked up people hang out here who excuse illegal and abusive behaviour simply because they dont personally like what that person was doing.

Reality doesn't work like that. No one is entitled to assault someone.

This bad logic is the same as the "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldnt have been there, so he didn't have a right to defend hinself" which is wrong, and the "Well Secoriea Turners mom shouldnt have driven down that road"

No......there is no excuse for violence, and if someone attacks another person that person has a right to defend themselves. People do not get a pass to attack kids.

It doesnt MATTER that you think he should have been riding his bike. That is an idiotic, lazy way of thinking.

We should be educating and encouraging our kids to participate civilly in democracy. I'm sure that kid also rides his bike and does other things, but in America we do not physically attack people for different political stances least of all children who are taking an interest in their country.

What you just said, discouraging kids from learning and getting to take part in things is probably why we have overgrown spoiled brats who think violence is preferable over civil discourse.

It is the responsibility of adults to manage their own behavior and take responsibility over themselves. A concept I've noticed is beyond you.

He was a minor illegally carrying an assault riffle dimbulb. He should have been home with his family no ifs or buts about it. It is not the job of pizzafaced 17 year olds to self deputize and run around brandishing assault riffles in violent mobs faces..... duh!!!

Shut the fuck up you gap-toothed fucking mole. Get back to your sandpit!

lol

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

He is 12 years old. He shouldn't be holding any political signs. He should be riding his bike with his friends or learning a few household skills.

So it's okay for adults to attack him? He isnt allowed to be interested in politics or support a president?

Okay so Caskur is offended that a 12 year old took an interest she doesnt think he should take but not that a grown adult attacked him.

I seriously cannot believe how many fucked up people hang out here who excuse illegal and abusive behaviour simply because they dont personally like what that person was doing.

Reality doesn't work like that. No one is entitled to assault someone.

This bad logic is the same as the "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldnt have been there, so he didn't have a right to defend hinself" which is wrong, and the "Well Secoriea Turners mom shouldnt have driven down that road"

No......there is no excuse for violence, and if someone attacks another person that person has a right to defend themselves. People do not get a pass to attack kids.

It doesnt MATTER that you think he should have been riding his bike. That is an idiotic, lazy way of thinking.

We should be educating and encouraging our kids to participate civilly in democracy. I'm sure that kid also rides his bike and does other things, but in America we do not physically attack people for different political stances least of all children who are taking an interest in their country.

What you just said, discouraging kids from learning and getting to take part in things is probably why we have overgrown spoiled brats who think violence is preferable over civil discourse.

It is the responsibility of adults to manage their own behavior and take responsibility over themselves. A concept I've noticed is beyond you.

He was a minor illegally carrying an assault riffle dimbulb. He should have been home with his family no ifs or buts about it. It is not the job of pizzafaced 17 year olds to self deputize and run around brandishing assault riffles in violent mobs faces..... duh!!!

It wasn't an assault rifle, it isn't illegal for 17 year olds to have rifles, he was a fully trained EMT, lifeguard, and in a police cadet styled program.

He also had finely honed self preservation instincts and was a diligent and measured marksman.

The US isn't Australia.

If he was standing in front of his own family home and gunned down a maurauding mob, I would agree with self defence but I stand by my original comment. See what happens in court. You'll have to wait and see.

You do realize that in a free and sane society you still maintain the right to self defense EVEN if you are in a place you are not supposed to be.

Look up the Wisconsin statute you fucking bloat goat

 

[Dove]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

He is 12 years old. He shouldn't be holding any political signs. He should be riding his bike with his friends or learning a few household skills.

So it's okay for adults to attack him? He isnt allowed to be interested in politics or support a president?

Okay so Caskur is offended that a 12 year old took an interest she doesnt think he should take but not that a grown adult attacked him.

I seriously cannot believe how many fucked up people hang out here who excuse illegal and abusive behaviour simply because they dont personally like what that person was doing.

Reality doesn't work like that. No one is entitled to assault someone.

This bad logic is the same as the "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldnt have been there, so he didn't have a right to defend hinself" which is wrong, and the "Well Secoriea Turners mom shouldnt have driven down that road"

No......there is no excuse for violence, and if someone attacks another person that person has a right to defend themselves. People do not get a pass to attack kids.

It doesnt MATTER that you think he should have been riding his bike. That is an idiotic, lazy way of thinking.

We should be educating and encouraging our kids to participate civilly in democracy. I'm sure that kid also rides his bike and does other things, but in America we do not physically attack people for different political stances least of all children who are taking an interest in their country.

What you just said, discouraging kids from learning and getting to take part in things is probably why we have overgrown spoiled brats who think violence is preferable over civil discourse.

It is the responsibility of adults to manage their own behavior and take responsibility over themselves. A concept I've noticed is beyond you.

He was a minor illegally carrying an assault riffle dimbulb. He should have been home with his family no ifs or buts about it. It is not the job of pizzafaced 17 year olds to self deputize and run around brandishing assault riffles in violent mobs faces..... duh!!!

The mobs showed up from other states to destroy that town and commit acts of political violence, but you are not holding savages.....savages who attempted to burn a building occupied by children.....to ANY standards of responsibility for their ACTUAL illegal acts.

Everyone in that community......and Kyle is indeed part of that community.. has a constitutional RIGHT to defend if the state cant or wont. That is constitutional.

If you want to nit pick about illegal behavior? Instead of trying to condemn a kid who was literally attacked for putting out a fire, you should be holding those standards to the fuckwads who were shot.

If those pricks had stayed home instead of descending on a community to destroy it? They wouldnt be dead or injured.

Dont call ME a dumbulb when you cannot even make a proper judgment call. You are a consistent victim blamer. All bitching that this kid was "breaking the law"(he wasnt) and should have been home.....but NOT applying that to the mobs of scum bag criminals who were there to destroy the community.

People are not entitled to riot, if those fucks had stayed home and left Kenosha alone, no one would have needed to be out there defending it in the first place.

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

Where does this mentality that it magically becomes legal and acceptable to violently assault someone if you think they should not have been there?

If I see you in the grocery store, can I punch you in the face because I personally think you should have stayed home that day? Or put a bag over your head? Since in Caskur land violence is acceptable if someone thinks you should have stayed home?

 

[Biggie Smiles]

wait.. what's all the talk about the mobs rioting when Kyle walks?

lmao

..... the rodents he exterminated were white and BLM is going to show you white devil cockroach liberals how much they give a fuck about your worthless lives when this trial doesn't even make a ripple in a small puddle

watch.

 

[Dove]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

He is 12 years old. He shouldn't be holding any political signs. He should be riding his bike with his friends or learning a few household skills.

So it's okay for adults to attack him? He isnt allowed to be interested in politics or support a president?

Okay so Caskur is offended that a 12 year old took an interest she doesnt think he should take but not that a grown adult attacked him.

I seriously cannot believe how many fucked up people hang out here who excuse illegal and abusive behaviour simply because they dont personally like what that person was doing.

Reality doesn't work like that. No one is entitled to assault someone.

This bad logic is the same as the "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldnt have been there, so he didn't have a right to defend hinself" which is wrong, and the "Well Secoriea Turners mom shouldnt have driven down that road"

No......there is no excuse for violence, and if someone attacks another person that person has a right to defend themselves. People do not get a pass to attack kids.

It doesnt MATTER that you think he should have been riding his bike. That is an idiotic, lazy way of thinking.

We should be educating and encouraging our kids to participate civilly in democracy. I'm sure that kid also rides his bike and does other things, but in America we do not physically attack people for different political stances least of all children who are taking an interest in their country.

What you just said, discouraging kids from learning and getting to take part in things is probably why we have overgrown spoiled brats who think violence is preferable over civil discourse.

It is the responsibility of adults to manage their own behavior and take responsibility over themselves. A concept I've noticed is beyond you.

He was a minor illegally carrying an assault riffle dimbulb. He should have been home with his family no ifs or buts about it. It is not the job of pizzafaced 17 year olds to self deputize and run around brandishing assault riffles in violent mobs faces..... duh!!!

It wasn't an assault rifle, it isn't illegal for 17 year olds to have rifles, he was a fully trained EMT, lifeguard, and in a police cadet styled program.

He also had finely honed self preservation instincts and was a diligent and measured marksman.

The US isn't Australia.

If he was standing in front of his own family home and gunned down a maurauding mob, I would agree with self defence but I stand by my original comment. See what happens in court. You'll have to wait and see.

You do realize that in a free and sane society you still maintain the right to self defense EVEN if you are in a place you are not supposed to be.

Look up the Wisconsin statute you fucking bloat goat

Caskur has consistently shitty judgement in which abusers get enabled and get free passes while it's the responsibility of the victim to avoid the abuser.

She said the same thing about that 12 year old kid who was assaulted by an adult. That he had no business having a sign and should have been out riding his bike.

Caskur wants a society in which abusers and criminals are not held responsible for their choices and actions because she thinks it's the victim who is responsible for the actions of the abuser.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

If that were my kid, I'd find that cunt, beat the fuck outta her, and carve "TRUMP" on her fukin ass and then curb stomped her in the pussy!

I'm saying.

I'd track her down on the low and fucking murder her in the most painful way I could think of

and I have a very wild imagination

 

[Frood]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

He is 12 years old. He shouldn't be holding any political signs. He should be riding his bike with his friends or learning a few household skills.

So it's okay for adults to attack him? He isnt allowed to be interested in politics or support a president?

Okay so Caskur is offended that a 12 year old took an interest she doesnt think he should take but not that a grown adult attacked him.

I seriously cannot believe how many fucked up people hang out here who excuse illegal and abusive behaviour simply because they dont personally like what that person was doing.

Reality doesn't work like that. No one is entitled to assault someone.

This bad logic is the same as the "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldnt have been there, so he didn't have a right to defend hinself" which is wrong, and the "Well Secoriea Turners mom shouldnt have driven down that road"

No......there is no excuse for violence, and if someone attacks another person that person has a right to defend themselves. People do not get a pass to attack kids.

It doesnt MATTER that you think he should have been riding his bike. That is an idiotic, lazy way of thinking.

We should be educating and encouraging our kids to participate civilly in democracy. I'm sure that kid also rides his bike and does other things, but in America we do not physically attack people for different political stances least of all children who are taking an interest in their country.

What you just said, discouraging kids from learning and getting to take part in things is probably why we have overgrown spoiled brats who think violence is preferable over civil discourse.

It is the responsibility of adults to manage their own behavior and take responsibility over themselves. A concept I've noticed is beyond you.

He was a minor illegally carrying an assault riffle dimbulb. He should have been home with his family no ifs or buts about it. It is not the job of pizzafaced 17 year olds to self deputize and run around brandishing assault riffles in violent mobs faces..... duh!!!

It wasn't an assault rifle, it isn't illegal for 17 year olds to have rifles, he was a fully trained EMT, lifeguard, and in a police cadet styled program.

He also had finely honed self preservation instincts and was a diligent and measured marksman.

The US isn't Australia.

If he was standing in front of his own family home and gunned down a maurauding mob, I would agree with self defence but I stand by my original comment. See what happens in court. You'll have to wait and see.

You do realize that in a free and sane society you still maintain the right to self defense EVEN if you are in a place you are not supposed to be.

Look up the Wisconsin statute you fucking bloat goat

Caskur has consistently shitty judgement in which abusers get enabled and get free passes while it's the responsibility of the victim to avoid the abuser.

She said the same thing about that 12 year old kid who was assaulted by an adult. That he had no business having a sign and should have been out riding his bike.

Caskur wants a society in which abusers and criminals are not held responsible for their choices and actions because she thinks it's the victim who is responsible for the actions of the abuser.

It's the Australian condition... not her fault totally... they were raised this way.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

My kids have access to the tools to blow these fuckers to smithereens. They best never pull that shit around my Hero Kyles.

Just like I taught my Kyles how to swim immediately after learning to walk I taught them how to shoot and armed them adequately when they became adults.

No one ever comes near my part of town pulling this shit. I'd happily murder a liberal JUST for being a liberal but someone puts their hands on my child? Oh, Imma have lots of fun with their trip to the next life. Believe that.

 

[Lokmar]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

If that were my kid, I'd find that cunt, beat the fuck outta her, and carve "TRUMP" on her fukin ass and then curb stomped her in the pussy!

I'm saying.

I'd track her down on the low and fucking murder her in the most painful way I could think of

and I have a very wild imagination

Then you just scrawl "BLM" on the body and drop it off in a democRAT controlled area and viola! No investigation!

 

[Dove]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

He is 12 years old. He shouldn't be holding any political signs. He should be riding his bike with his friends or learning a few household skills.

So it's okay for adults to attack him? He isnt allowed to be interested in politics or support a president?

Okay so Caskur is offended that a 12 year old took an interest she doesnt think he should take but not that a grown adult attacked him.

I seriously cannot believe how many fucked up people hang out here who excuse illegal and abusive behaviour simply because they dont personally like what that person was doing.

Reality doesn't work like that. No one is entitled to assault someone.

This bad logic is the same as the "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldnt have been there, so he didn't have a right to defend hinself" which is wrong, and the "Well Secoriea Turners mom shouldnt have driven down that road"

No......there is no excuse for violence, and if someone attacks another person that person has a right to defend themselves. People do not get a pass to attack kids.

It doesnt MATTER that you think he should have been riding his bike. That is an idiotic, lazy way of thinking.

We should be educating and encouraging our kids to participate civilly in democracy. I'm sure that kid also rides his bike and does other things, but in America we do not physically attack people for different political stances least of all children who are taking an interest in their country.

What you just said, discouraging kids from learning and getting to take part in things is probably why we have overgrown spoiled brats who think violence is preferable over civil discourse.

It is the responsibility of adults to manage their own behavior and take responsibility over themselves. A concept I've noticed is beyond you.

He was a minor illegally carrying an assault riffle dimbulb. He should have been home with his family no ifs or buts about it. It is not the job of pizzafaced 17 year olds to self deputize and run around brandishing assault riffles in violent mobs faces..... duh!!!

It wasn't an assault rifle, it isn't illegal for 17 year olds to have rifles, he was a fully trained EMT, lifeguard, and in a police cadet styled program.

He also had finely honed self preservation instincts and was a diligent and measured marksman.

The US isn't Australia.

If he was standing in front of his own family home and gunned down a maurauding mob, I would agree with self defence but I stand by my original comment. See what happens in court. You'll have to wait and see.

He'll get off unless civil rights and justice don't matter anymore...

She has no interest in the kid. Read between the lines and you’ll realise what she’s really trying to say and to whom...

She legit thinks that we forfeit our rights to self defense if we are in a place she doesn't think we belong.

She thinks the judge is gonna be like "Well Kyle, if you were not going to let this mob beat and murder you, you should have stayed home. But here in America, if you were dumb enough to leave your home you are not legally allowed to defend your life"

How do people even get this stupid? How do people even get fucked up and hateful enough to even think like this?

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

He is 12 years old. He shouldn't be holding any political signs. He should be riding his bike with his friends or learning a few household skills.

So it's okay for adults to attack him? He isnt allowed to be interested in politics or support a president?

Okay so Caskur is offended that a 12 year old took an interest she doesnt think he should take but not that a grown adult attacked him.

I seriously cannot believe how many fucked up people hang out here who excuse illegal and abusive behaviour simply because they dont personally like what that person was doing.

Reality doesn't work like that. No one is entitled to assault someone.

This bad logic is the same as the "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldnt have been there, so he didn't have a right to defend hinself" which is wrong, and the "Well Secoriea Turners mom shouldnt have driven down that road"

No......there is no excuse for violence, and if someone attacks another person that person has a right to defend themselves. People do not get a pass to attack kids.

It doesnt MATTER that you think he should have been riding his bike. That is an idiotic, lazy way of thinking.

We should be educating and encouraging our kids to participate civilly in democracy. I'm sure that kid also rides his bike and does other things, but in America we do not physically attack people for different political stances least of all children who are taking an interest in their country.

What you just said, discouraging kids from learning and getting to take part in things is probably why we have overgrown spoiled brats who think violence is preferable over civil discourse.

It is the responsibility of adults to manage their own behavior and take responsibility over themselves. A concept I've noticed is beyond you.

He was a minor illegally carrying an assault riffle dimbulb. He should have been home with his family no ifs or buts about it. It is not the job of pizzafaced 17 year olds to self deputize and run around brandishing assault riffles in violent mobs faces..... duh!!!

The mobs showed up from other states to destroy that town and commit acts of political violence, but you are not holding savages.....savages who attempted to burn a building occupied by children.....to ANY standards of responsibility for their ACTUAL illegal acts.

Everyone in that community......and Kyle is indeed part of that community.. has a constitutional RIGHT to defend if the state cant or wont. That is constitutional.

If you want to nit pick about illegal behavior? Instead of trying to condemn a kid who was literally attacked for putting out a fire, you should be holding those standards to the fuckwads who were shot.

If those pricks had stayed home instead of descending on a community to destroy it? They wouldnt be dead or injured.

Dont call ME a dumbulb when you cannot even make a proper judgment call. You are a consistent victim blamer. All bitching that this kid was "breaking the law"(he wasnt) and should have been home.....but NOT applying that to the mobs of scum bag criminals who were there to destroy the community.

People are not entitled to riot, if those fucks had stayed home and left Kenosha alone, no one would have needed to be out there defending it in the first place.

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

Where does this mentality that it magically becomes legal and acceptable to violently assault someone if you think they should not have been there?

If I see you in the grocery store, can I punch you in the face because I personally think you should have stayed home that day? Or put a bag over your head? Since in Caskur land violence is acceptable if someone thinks you should have stayed home?

Did you realize that Righteous Kyle exterminated those rodents on my birthday?

What a birthday gift to me from my son in spirit.

I gotta find another kyle defense fund to donate to

 

[Dove]

My kids have access to the tools to blow these fuckers to smithereens. They best never pull that shit around my Hero Kyles.

Just like I taught my Kyles how to swim immediately after learning to walk I taught them how to shoot and armed them adequately when they became adults.

No one ever comes near my part of town pulling this shit. I'd happily murder a liberal JUST for being a liberal but someone puts their hands on my child? Oh, Imma have lots of fun with their trip to the next life. Believe that.

Now Big dont be such a dumbulb.

If you didn't want adults to beat or kill your kids? You shouldnt let them go out in public.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

He is 12 years old. He shouldn't be holding any political signs. He should be riding his bike with his friends or learning a few household skills.

So it's okay for adults to attack him? He isnt allowed to be interested in politics or support a president?

Okay so Caskur is offended that a 12 year old took an interest she doesnt think he should take but not that a grown adult attacked him.

I seriously cannot believe how many fucked up people hang out here who excuse illegal and abusive behaviour simply because they dont personally like what that person was doing.

Reality doesn't work like that. No one is entitled to assault someone.

This bad logic is the same as the "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldnt have been there, so he didn't have a right to defend hinself" which is wrong, and the "Well Secoriea Turners mom shouldnt have driven down that road"

No......there is no excuse for violence, and if someone attacks another person that person has a right to defend themselves. People do not get a pass to attack kids.

It doesnt MATTER that you think he should have been riding his bike. That is an idiotic, lazy way of thinking.

We should be educating and encouraging our kids to participate civilly in democracy. I'm sure that kid also rides his bike and does other things, but in America we do not physically attack people for different political stances least of all children who are taking an interest in their country.

What you just said, discouraging kids from learning and getting to take part in things is probably why we have overgrown spoiled brats who think violence is preferable over civil discourse.

It is the responsibility of adults to manage their own behavior and take responsibility over themselves. A concept I've noticed is beyond you.

He was a minor illegally carrying an assault riffle dimbulb. He should have been home with his family no ifs or buts about it. It is not the job of pizzafaced 17 year olds to self deputize and run around brandishing assault riffles in violent mobs faces..... duh!!!

It wasn't an assault rifle, it isn't illegal for 17 year olds to have rifles, he was a fully trained EMT, lifeguard, and in a police cadet styled program.

He also had finely honed self preservation instincts and was a diligent and measured marksman.

The US isn't Australia.

If he was standing in front of his own family home and gunned down a maurauding mob, I would agree with self defence but I stand by my original comment. See what happens in court. You'll have to wait and see.

You do realize that in a free and sane society you still maintain the right to self defense EVEN if you are in a place you are not supposed to be.

Look up the Wisconsin statute you fucking bloat goat

Caskur has consistently shitty judgement in which abusers get enabled and get free passes while it's the responsibility of the victim to avoid the abuser.

She said the same thing about that 12 year old kid who was assaulted by an adult. That he had no business having a sign and should have been out riding his bike.

Caskur wants a society in which abusers and criminals are not held responsible for their choices and actions because she thinks it's the victim who is responsible for the actions of the abuser.

Caskur has the IQ of a fucking amoeba ... you expected different?

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Because this shits normal

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But we are all cons and all tribal

He is 12 years old. He shouldn't be holding any political signs. He should be riding his bike with his friends or learning a few household skills.

So it's okay for adults to attack him? He isnt allowed to be interested in politics or support a president?

Okay so Caskur is offended that a 12 year old took an interest she doesnt think he should take but not that a grown adult attacked him.

I seriously cannot believe how many fucked up people hang out here who excuse illegal and abusive behaviour simply because they dont personally like what that person was doing.

Reality doesn't work like that. No one is entitled to assault someone.

This bad logic is the same as the "Kyle Rittenhouse shouldnt have been there, so he didn't have a right to defend hinself" which is wrong, and the "Well Secoriea Turners mom shouldnt have driven down that road"

No......there is no excuse for violence, and if someone attacks another person that person has a right to defend themselves. People do not get a pass to attack kids.

It doesnt MATTER that you think he should have been riding his bike. That is an idiotic, lazy way of thinking.

We should be educating and encouraging our kids to participate civilly in democracy. I'm sure that kid also rides his bike and does other things, but in America we do not physically attack people for different political stances least of all children who are taking an interest in their country.

What you just said, discouraging kids from learning and getting to take part in things is probably why we have overgrown spoiled brats who think violence is preferable over civil discourse.

It is the responsibility of adults to manage their own behavior and take responsibility over themselves. A concept I've noticed is beyond you.

He was a minor illegally carrying an assault riffle dimbulb. He should have been home with his family no ifs or buts about it. It is not the job of pizzafaced 17 year olds to self deputize and run around brandishing assault riffles in violent mobs faces..... duh!!!

It wasn't an assault rifle, it isn't illegal for 17 year olds to have rifles, he was a fully trained EMT, lifeguard, and in a police cadet styled program.

He also had finely honed self preservation instincts and was a diligent and measured marksman.

The US isn't Australia.

If he was standing in front of his own family home and gunned down a maurauding mob, I would agree with self defence but I stand by my original comment. See what happens in court. You'll have to wait and see.

He'll get off unless civil rights and justice don't matter anymore...

She has no interest in the kid. Read between the lines and you’ll realise what she’s really trying to say and to whom...

She legit thinks that we forfeit our rights to self defense if we are in a place she doesn't think we belong.

She thinks the judge is gonna be like "Well Kyle, if you were not going to let this mob beat and murder you, you should have stayed home. But here in America, if you were dumb enough to leave your home you are not legally allowed to defend your life"

How do people even get this stupid? How do people even get fucked up and hateful enough to even think like this?

If, on the slim chance kyle does get convicted then America isn't America anymore and the civil war needs to begin.

Period

 

[Omnipotent]

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

I know your intelligence is that of a 4th grader trailor trash but there is NO law on the planet that allows 17 yr old minors to illegally carry arms downtown resulting in murder... NONE.

You digress with long winded spiel hoping to validate your stand dimbulb but in court digressing doesn't count. Stick to facts.

That Latino prick that murdered 16-17 yr old Trayvon years ago should have got life. Vigilantes get it wrong. If vigilanteism is so fucking right how come you and your self righteous cronnies here aren't sending your precious baked potato-heads to the front lines?

 

[Dove]

I don't know about you guys.....but everytime I leave my house I bring my civil rights with me.

It looks like a disturbing amount of epidemic narcissism. People who think if criminals attack you in public, you are obligated to allow it. That we have no rights if we are in public. We are public property. And we should accept this upon leaving our homes.

These kinds of people think abusers and rapists and murders are not responsible for their actions, its the people they target who are responsible.

This particular pig thinks shes entitled to give my address and info to an actual criminal with a history of documented abuse and if anything happened.....well it MY fault entirely because I met him in the first place. I'm the only adult in this who has any responsibility. He has absolutely zero. Because I should not have met him. But since I did meet him, I'm never allowed to cut contact and he is forever entitled to do whatever he wants.

Because when you go in public or meet someone you no longer have any autonomy and you are obligated to allow crimes to be committed against you.

This is how people like this think. This is what we are up against. An entitled 3rd world mentality devoid of proper judgement that caters to the worst of society. The dredges. These people dont honor civil rights. They have no proper moral standards. They are narcissistic advocates for violent scum and tyranny.

I highly doubt Caskur would hold her OWN self to these standards if SHE was attacked outside her home or harassed by someone she ended contact with. But she thinks everyone else's rights are a negotiation here and a joke. The entitlement.

 

[Dove]

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

I know your intelligence is that of a 4th grader trailor trash but there is NO law on the planet that allows 17 yr old minors to illegally carry arms downtown resulting in murder... NONE.

You digress with long winded spiel hoping to validate your stand dimbulb but in court digressing doesn't count. Stick to facts.

That Latino prick that murdered 16-17 yr old Trayvon years ago should have got life. Vigilantes get it wrong. If vigilanteism is so fucking right how come you and your self righteous cronnies here aren't sending your precious baked potato-heads to the front lines?

That kid still has a right to self defense.

If its found that his possession of a fire arm was illegal that will be handled. But he will NOT be charged with murder. Because he still has a right to defend himself.

Pick up those knuckles and wipe the drool off your hairy chin before you insult someone else's intelligence... ...you dirt bag defending fucking moron.

The fact you've deluded yourself into thinking you are some righteous judge of all who could settle all the worlds issues from your ivory tower of stupid doesnt make it true. You are absolutely clueless, and a bias fucking narc who thinks your feelings and opinions are valuable.

You are not informed or smart enough to grasp what went wrong in the Martin case. Blame overzealous prosecutors and politics. At least you'll SOUND smarter.

 

[Biggie Smiles]

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

I know your intelligence is that of a 4th grader trailor trash but there is NO law on the planet that allows 17 yr old minors to illegally carry arms downtown resulting in murder... NONE.

You digress with long winded spiel hoping to validate your stand dimbulb but in court digressing doesn't count. Stick to facts.

That Latino prick that murdered 16-17 yr old Trayvon years ago should have got life. Vigilantes get it wrong. If vigilanteism is so fucking right how come you and your self righteous cronnies here aren't sending your precious baked potato-heads to the front lines?

It all boils down to intent, dickweasle.

Did he intend to go to the riots and kill others or did he intend to go to the riots to help others carrying a weapon to defend himself since the threat of violence was very real?

Video footage taken before he justly exterminated those two cockroaches clearly shows his intent was to provide medical aid and protect a friend's business. THAT's reasonable doubt to your whole idea of vigilantism, dummy.

 

[Frood]

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

I know your intelligence is that of a 4th grader trailor trash but there is NO law on the planet that allows 17 yr old minors to illegally carry arms downtown resulting in murder... NONE.

You digress with long winded spiel hoping to validate your stand dimbulb but in court digressing doesn't count. Stick to facts.

That Latino prick that murdered 16-17 yr old Trayvon years ago should have got life. Vigilantes get it wrong. If vigilanteism is so fucking right how come you and your self righteous cronnies here aren't sending your precious baked potato-heads to the front lines?

17 year olds are not minors in the US when it comes to car ownership, full drivers licences, and the right to hunt and protect themselves against assaults.

The fact that he was a qualified EMT and lifesaver wouldn't even happen here in Oz. We mollycoddle and infantize our youth till they hit 30 years old.

Different cultures, Caskur.

 

[Dove]

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

I know your intelligence is that of a 4th grader trailor trash but there is NO law on the planet that allows 17 yr old minors to illegally carry arms downtown resulting in murder... NONE.

You digress with long winded spiel hoping to validate your stand dimbulb but in court digressing doesn't count. Stick to facts.

That Latino prick that murdered 16-17 yr old Trayvon years ago should have got life. Vigilantes get it wrong. If vigilanteism is so fucking right how come you and your self righteous cronnies here aren't sending your precious baked potato-heads to the front lines?

It all boils down to intent, dickweasle.

Did he intend to go to the riots and kill others or did he intend to go to the riots to help others carrying a weapon to defend himself since the threat of violence was very real?

Video footage taken before he justly exterminated those two cockroaches clearly shows his intent was to provide medical aid and protect a friend's business. THAT's reasonable doubt to your whole idea of vigilantism, dummy.

Really she belongs in meltdown subforum pits back stroking through all the drool, screaming about interpersonal dramas of other people and looking up strangers.

 

[Dove]

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

I know your intelligence is that of a 4th grader trailor trash but there is NO law on the planet that allows 17 yr old minors to illegally carry arms downtown resulting in murder... NONE.

You digress with long winded spiel hoping to validate your stand dimbulb but in court digressing doesn't count. Stick to facts.

That Latino prick that murdered 16-17 yr old Trayvon years ago should have got life. Vigilantes get it wrong. If vigilanteism is so fucking right how come you and your self righteous cronnies here aren't sending your precious baked potato-heads to the front lines?

17 year olds are not minors in the US when it comes to car ownership, full drivers licences, and the right to hunt and protect themselves against assaults.

The fact that he was a qualified EMT and lifesaver wouldn't even happen here in Oz. We mollycoddle and infantize our youth till they hit 30 years old.

Different cultures, Caskur.

Minors are ALWAYS allowed to defend themselves.

Only a monster would argue that people under 18 are not permitted to defend themselves against attacks.

 

[Omnipotent]

I have said my lawful piece...nothing needs to be added other than all children should go school and then stay home and behave their pointy headed selves.

Go fight the law if you have issues with it and good luck with that.

 

[Dove]

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

I know your intelligence is that of a 4th grader trailor trash but there is NO law on the planet that allows 17 yr old minors to illegally carry arms downtown resulting in murder... NONE.

You digress with long winded spiel hoping to validate your stand dimbulb but in court digressing doesn't count. Stick to facts.

That Latino prick that murdered 16-17 yr old Trayvon years ago should have got life. Vigilantes get it wrong. If vigilanteism is so fucking right how come you and your self righteous cronnies here aren't sending your precious baked potato-heads to the front lines?

It all boils down to intent, dickweasle.

Did he intend to go to the riots and kill others or did he intend to go to the riots to help others carrying a weapon to defend himself since the threat of violence was very real?

Video footage taken before he justly exterminated those two cockroaches clearly shows his intent was to provide medical aid and protect a friend's business. THAT's reasonable doubt to your whole idea of vigilantism, dummy.

Yet the rioters who went with intent to break the law dont get a shred of responsibility in the minds of these people.

And jack ass segregation Joe bails them out cuz......fuck the workers and the poor.

 

[Frood]

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

I know your intelligence is that of a 4th grader trailor trash but there is NO law on the planet that allows 17 yr old minors to illegally carry arms downtown resulting in murder... NONE.

You digress with long winded spiel hoping to validate your stand dimbulb but in court digressing doesn't count. Stick to facts.

That Latino prick that murdered 16-17 yr old Trayvon years ago should have got life. Vigilantes get it wrong. If vigilanteism is so fucking right how come you and your self righteous cronnies here aren't sending your precious baked potato-heads to the front lines?

17 year olds are not minors in the US when it comes to car ownership, full drivers licences, and the right to hunt and protect themselves against assaults.

The fact that he was a qualified EMT and lifesaver wouldn't even happen here in Oz. We mollycoddle and infantize our youth till they hit 30 years old.

Different cultures, Caskur.

Minors are ALWAYS allowed to defend themselves.

Only a monster would argue that people under 18 are not permitted to defend themselves against attacks.

Nobody is allowed to defend themselves here if they are pre-armed.

Ie. You will be charged if you remove your firearm from the gunlocker before you are assaulted and stop the assault.

It's a bizarre system...

 

[Dove]

I have said my lawful piece...nothing needs to be added other than all children should go school and then stay home and behave their pointy headed selves.

Go fight the law if you have issues with it and good luck with that.

No your idiotic opinion is NOT lawful. You are so wrong its revolting.

There is that narcissism again thinking more of your opinion than you should.

You go on and cite the law you think this kid broke, and explain why you think that law forfeits his right to self defense and let's the rioters who attacked him off the hook.

Go on. Back your claim.

 

[Dove]

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

I know your intelligence is that of a 4th grader trailor trash but there is NO law on the planet that allows 17 yr old minors to illegally carry arms downtown resulting in murder... NONE.

You digress with long winded spiel hoping to validate your stand dimbulb but in court digressing doesn't count. Stick to facts.

That Latino prick that murdered 16-17 yr old Trayvon years ago should have got life. Vigilantes get it wrong. If vigilanteism is so fucking right how come you and your self righteous cronnies here aren't sending your precious baked potato-heads to the front lines?

17 year olds are not minors in the US when it comes to car ownership, full drivers licences, and the right to hunt and protect themselves against assaults.

The fact that he was a qualified EMT and lifesaver wouldn't even happen here in Oz. We mollycoddle and infantize our youth till they hit 30 years old.

Different cultures, Caskur.

Minors are ALWAYS allowed to defend themselves.

Only a monster would argue that people under 18 are not permitted to defend themselves against attacks.

Nobody is allowed to defend themselves here if they are pre-armed.

Ie. You will be charged if you remove your firearm from the gunlocker before you are assaulted and stop the assault.

It's a bizarre system...

So basically you have no rights.

That's fucked.

It makes her stance make sense though. Australia has paper trained citizens to enable criminals and hold victims responsible. That's.....sad.

No proper personal responsibility is understood.

 

[Frood]

I have said my lawful piece...nothing needs to be added other than all children should go school and then stay home and behave their pointy headed selves.

Go fight the law if you have issues with it and good luck with that.

No your idiotic opinion is NOT lawful. You are so wrong its revolting.

There is that narcissism again thinking more of your opinion than you should.

You go on and cite the law you think this kid broke, and explain why you think that law forfeits his right to self defense and let's the rioters who attacked him off the hook.

Go on. Back your claim.

I kind of explained where Caskur is culturally coming from, whether I agree with it or not.

I won't attack her for it. I'm of both cultures. She's only of this one.

 

[Frood]

Good thing we have laws that protect people rights to self defense regardless of what someone's random lazy opinion is. Laws still apply whether you think that person should have been at home or not.

I know your intelligence is that of a 4th grader trailor trash but there is NO law on the planet that allows 17 yr old minors to illegally carry arms downtown resulting in murder... NONE.

You digress with long winded spiel hoping to validate your stand dimbulb but in court digressing doesn't count. Stick to facts.

That Latino prick that murdered 16-17 yr old Trayvon years ago should have got life. Vigilantes get it wrong. If vigilanteism is so fucking right how come you and your self righteous cronnies here aren't sending your precious baked potato-heads to the front lines?

17 year olds are not minors in the US when it comes to car ownership, full drivers licences, and the right to hunt and protect themselves against assaults.

The fact that he was a qualified EMT and lifesaver wouldn't even happen here in Oz. We mollycoddle and infantize our youth till they hit 30 years old.

Different cultures, Caskur.

Minors are ALWAYS allowed to defend themselves.

Only a monster would argue that people under 18 are not permitted to defend themselves against attacks.

Nobody is allowed to defend themselves here if they are pre-armed.

Ie. You will be charged if you remove your firearm from the gunlocker before you are assaulted and stop the assault.

It's a bizarre system...

So basically you have no rights.

That's fucked.

It makes her stance make sense though. Australia has paper trained citizens to enable criminals and hold victims responsible. That's.....sad.

No proper personal responsibility is understood.

It's reverse logic. If using a weapon, even to repel an armed attacker, is on dicey legal standing.... it doesn't matter that we still have the right to self defence.

It's a catch 22 they use to manage the herd.

So the population have come up with interesting ways to deal with such things...