Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Oerdin" data-source="post: 323423" data-attributes="member: 128">The first two pictures show flags with the Prussian Eagle (probably 15th or 16th century).&nbsp; That was in Germany not England; a full 1000 to 800 years after this setting).&nbsp; From Queen Elizabeth I on, yes, there were token black people in England, often slaves, but extremely rare thus why they were only in royal courts or as show pieces in the houses of the very rich, by and large.&nbsp; This story was supposed to be in early mideaval England (500 a.d. to 700 a.d.) so, no, there were not any appreciable non-white people.&nbsp; Yet the King's nephew,&nbsp; the only son of his half sister, is supposed to be an Indian Hindu?&nbsp; Given me a break!In this settings time frame any non-Christian would have been persecuted by the church.&nbsp; As the Roman Empire had collapsed and the funeral societies based their entire conhession and reason de state (namely devine right of kings) upon the religious order.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Oerdin, post: 323423, member: 128"] The first two pictures show flags with the Prussian Eagle (probably 15th or 16th century). That was in Germany not England; a full 1000 to 800 years after this setting). From Queen Elizabeth I on, yes, there were token black people in England, often slaves, but extremely rare thus why they were only in royal courts or as show pieces in the houses of the very rich, by and large. This story was supposed to be in early mideaval England (500 a.d. to 700 a.d.) so, no, there were not any appreciable non-white people. Yet the King's nephew, the only son of his half sister, is supposed to be an Indian Hindu? Given me a break! In this settings time frame any non-Christian would have been persecuted by the church. As the Roman Empire had collapsed and the funeral societies based their entire conhession and reason de state (namely devine right of kings) upon the religious order. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification