Why in hell are there no threads about Ginny Thomas?

I pondered it, but I wasn't sure if the local political scientists could connect the dots, do the math, cut the mustard, much less smell the coffee, see the writing on the wall, or the light in the tunnel.
 
That Coney Barrett one worries me the most, being a religious cultist who by the law of the cult must obey her male cultists in all matters. Including one presumes, when they tell her how to rule from the bench.

Take a close look at her. You can see she is Satan's consort.
 
What about her?

The "integrity" of the Scotus? I mean we just saw a total partisan kook who was light as fuck on child rapists who wouldnt define woman get appointed.

It's hilarious that ever since dems and progs decided anything one of their own does is perfectly fine and can be ignored and defended they always expect the opposition to be better than they are.

Integrity either goes both ways and is an even expectations with even accountability or it's to be trashed entirely.

If dem/prog voters wont hold their own people accountable and if they decide to allow anything, they cannot expect integrity out of their opposition

I also notice everytime those who are not dems/progs step out of line its always "dangerous" and a "threat" to whatever even though that's been shat away when they were cool when it was their side.

What did Ginny do that was so awful? Support the wrong riot? Progressive politicians incite violence in communities and corporate media works hard to distort truth and lie to help democrats. So what integrity is supposed be a concern?
 
That Coney Barrett one worries me the most, being a religious cultist who by the law of the cult must obey her male cultists in all matters. Including one presumes, when they tell her how to rule from the bench.

Take a close look at her. You can see she is Satan's consort.

Yes because you hate the Constitution and think everyone should think like you. Anyone who doesnt align with your views would "concern" you.

Your cult is better than her cult, right?
 
That Coney Barrett one worries me the most, being a religious cultist who by the law of the cult must obey her male cultists in all matters. Including one presumes, when they tell her how to rule from the bench.

Take a close look at her. You can see she is Satan's consort.
Her 'little girl voice' gives me a heckon' concern.
 
That Coney Barrett one worries me the most, being a religious cultist who by the law of the cult must obey her male cultists in all matters. Including one presumes, when they tell her how to rule from the bench.

Take a close look at her. You can see she is Satan's consort.
Her 'little girl voice' gives me a heckon' concern.
You know they are pedos, and want her to stay young.....very young.

...and subservient
 
What about her?

The "integrity" of the Scotus? I mean we just saw a total partisan kook who was light as fuck on child rapists who wouldnt define woman get appointed.

It's hilarious that ever since dems and progs decided anything one of their own does is perfectly fine and can be ignored and defended they always expect the opposition to be better than they are.

Integrity either goes both ways and is an even expectations with even accountability or it's to be trashed entirely.

If dem/prog voters wont hold their own people accountable and if they decide to allow anything, they cannot expect integrity out of their opposition

I also notice everytime those who are not dems/progs step out of line its always "dangerous" and a "threat" to whatever even though that's been shat away when they were cool when it was their side.

What did Ginny do that was so awful? Support the wrong riot? Progressive politicians incite violence in communities and corporate media works hard to distort truth and lie to help democrats. So what integrity is supposed be a concern?
What are your deep dive thoughts about The SCOTUS Oligarchy?
 
What about her?

The "integrity" of the Scotus? I mean we just saw a total partisan kook who was light as fuck on child rapists who wouldnt define woman get appointed.

It's hilarious that ever since dems and progs decided anything one of their own does is perfectly fine and can be ignored and defended they always expect the opposition to be better than they are.

Integrity either goes both ways and is an even expectations with even accountability or it's to be trashed entirely.

If dem/prog voters wont hold their own people accountable and if they decide to allow anything, they cannot expect integrity out of their opposition

I also notice everytime those who are not dems/progs step out of line its always "dangerous" and a "threat" to whatever even though that's been shat away when they were cool when it was their side.

What did Ginny do that was so awful? Support the wrong riot? Progressive politicians incite violence in communities and corporate media works hard to distort truth and lie to help democrats. So what integrity is supposed be a concern?
What are your deep dive thoughts about The SCOTUS Oligarchy?
Who are you talking to?
 
What about her?

The "integrity" of the Scotus? I mean we just saw a total partisan kook who was light as fuck on child rapists who wouldnt define woman get appointed.

It's hilarious that ever since dems and progs decided anything one of their own does is perfectly fine and can be ignored and defended they always expect the opposition to be better than they are.

Integrity either goes both ways and is an even expectations with even accountability or it's to be trashed entirely.

If dem/prog voters wont hold their own people accountable and if they decide to allow anything, they cannot expect integrity out of their opposition

I also notice everytime those who are not dems/progs step out of line its always "dangerous" and a "threat" to whatever even though that's been shat away when they were cool when it was their side.

What did Ginny do that was so awful? Support the wrong riot? Progressive politicians incite violence in communities and corporate media works hard to distort truth and lie to help democrats. So what integrity is supposed be a concern?
What are your deep dive thoughts about The SCOTUS Oligarchy?
Who are you talking to?
Madam Do-vary.
 
What about her?

The "integrity" of the Scotus? I mean we just saw a total partisan kook who was light as fuck on child rapists who wouldnt define woman get appointed.

It's hilarious that ever since dems and progs decided anything one of their own does is perfectly fine and can be ignored and defended they always expect the opposition to be better than they are.

Integrity either goes both ways and is an even expectations with even accountability or it's to be trashed entirely.

If dem/prog voters wont hold their own people accountable and if they decide to allow anything, they cannot expect integrity out of their opposition

I also notice everytime those who are not dems/progs step out of line its always "dangerous" and a "threat" to whatever even though that's been shat away when they were cool when it was their side.

What did Ginny do that was so awful? Support the wrong riot? Progressive politicians incite violence in communities and corporate media works hard to distort truth and lie to help democrats. So what integrity is supposed be a concern?
What are your deep dive thoughts about The SCOTUS Oligarchy?
Who are you talking to?
Madam Do-vary.
Never herd of her.
 
What about her?

The "integrity" of the Scotus? I mean we just saw a total partisan kook who was light as fuck on child rapists who wouldnt define woman get appointed.

It's hilarious that ever since dems and progs decided anything one of their own does is perfectly fine and can be ignored and defended they always expect the opposition to be better than they are.

Integrity either goes both ways and is an even expectations with even accountability or it's to be trashed entirely.

If dem/prog voters wont hold their own people accountable and if they decide to allow anything, they cannot expect integrity out of their opposition

I also notice everytime those who are not dems/progs step out of line its always "dangerous" and a "threat" to whatever even though that's been shat away when they were cool when it was their side.

What did Ginny do that was so awful? Support the wrong riot? Progressive politicians incite violence in communities and corporate media works hard to distort truth and lie to help democrats. So what integrity is supposed be a concern?
What are your deep dive thoughts about The SCOTUS Oligarchy?

I understand that you think this was a good attempt at some sort of sarcasm but it's really not. It doesnt even make sense.

So what are you trying to say here?
 
xjzABNs.png
 
That Coney Barrett one worries me the most, being a religious cultist who by the law of the cult must obey her male cultists in all matters. Including one presumes, when they tell her how to rule from the bench.

Take a close look at her. You can see she is Satan's consort.
Her 'little girl voice' gives me a heckon' concern.
You know they are pedos, and want her to stay young.....very young.

...and subservient

So they can take them to CA and marry them.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

After lots of grooming in pre school and kinder

 
That Coney Barrett one worries me the most, being a religious cultist who by the law of the cult must obey her male cultists in all matters. Including one presumes, when they tell her how to rule from the bench.

Take a close look at her. You can see she is Satan's consort.

A fucking handmaiden. An even more destructive nomination than Kavanaugh's. And Mitch's Senate confirmed them both, 100% party over country, not even to mention the slam dunkage of the Barrett nomination four years after denying Garland a hearing.
 
Come the fuck on, people... it's only the integrity of the SCOTUS that's at stake here.

...so perhaps Ginny Thomas only married Clarence Thomas as a means of advancing her political agenda?

He was just a useful tool/fool for. her?